Skip to main content Skip to footer

Innovative Waterproofing Solutions for Blind-Side Applications Using Prefabricated Modified-Bituminous Sheet Membranes

March 17, 2015

Innovative Waterproofing Solutions for
Blind-Side Applications Using Prefabricated
Modified-Bituminous Sheet Membranes
Jean-François Côté; Rémi Saucier, TP;
and Henry Staresina
Soprema Inc.
1688 J-b. Michaud st., Drummondville, QC, Canada J2C 8e9
Phone : 819-478-8166 • fax : 819-478-8044 • e-mail: soprema@soprema.ca
3 0 t h RC I I n t e R n a t I o n a l C o n v e n t I o n a n d t R a d e S h ow • M a R C h 5 – 1 0 , 2 0 1 5 C ô t é e t a l . • 1 7 3
Abstract
Blindside waterproofing provides challenges that can be addressed using prefabricated
polymer-modified-bitumen sheet membranes. Benefits of a fully adhered system—such as
preventing lateral water migration on the interior side of the membrane—will be presented,
along with ways of taking advantage of the concrete curing process for an intimate bond
between the concrete and membrane.
Blindside waterproofing systems based on modified-bituminous sheets and accessories
meet the expectations of designers for soil conditions and contaminants, as well as gas
permeability of membranes, while providing contractors with an ease in installation and
detailing. They allow a cost-effective solution to accomplish watertight structures.
Speakers
Jean-François Côté — Soprema Inc.
JEan-FrançOiS CôTÉ joined Soprema in 1999 as a research chemist and has been the
company’s director of strategic development since 2009, coordinating the activities related
to product and systems development. He is cochair of the aSTm D08-04 subcommittee and
is an active member of various technical committees, including those of the asphalt roofing
manufacturers association (arma), the Single Ply roofing industry (SPri), the Canadian
Standards association (CSa), and Underwriters laboratories of Canada (UlC).
Henry Staresina — Soprema Inc.
HEnrY STarESina is Soprema’s technical specialist for building envelope solutions. He
has been a part of the Canadian construction industry since 1980. Hank has been involved
with a number of high-level manufacturers, providing him with a vast knowledge of industry
practices. He serves on the board of directors of the Building and Concrete restoration
association and is past president of the Sealant Waterproofing association of Ontario.
1 7 4 • C ô t é e t a l . 3 0 t h R C I I n t e R n a t I o n a l C o n v e n t I o n a n d t R a d e S h ow • M a R C h 5 – 1 0 , 2 0 1 5
3 0 t h RC I I n t e R n a t I o n a l C o n v e n t I o n a n d t R a d e S h ow • M a R C h 5 – 1 0 , 2 0 1 5 C ô t é e t a l . • 1 7 5
INTRODUCTION
Blindside (or preapplied) waterproofing
is the practice of installing waterproofing
prior to the installation of concrete structure.
Construction in dense urban areas
(see Figure 1) requires more and more use
of this type of waterproofing. Waterproofing
zero-clearance property line construction
projects can provide challenging scenarios
but also have significant advantages.
Blindside work remains less dangerous
than working in a confined trench area and
allows the installer quicker application due
to freedom of movement and accessibility.
The use of modified-bitumen prefabricated
sheet membranes in blindside applications
is relatively new. Previous attempts
with spray-applied bituminous products
or hot-rubberized asphalts were not very
successful. But by
extending cutting-edge,
proven technologies in
prefabricated polymermodified-
bitumen sheet
membranes to waterproofing
needs, trained
installers can efficiently
accomplish watertight
structures in scenarios
previously thought difficult
or impossible.
impermeability of modified-
bitumen sheets to
gases such as methane
has contributed to
the renewed interest of
this type of material for
below-grade waterproofing.
Experience accumulated
in application and
forensic examination
over the last 10-plus
years has allowed the
refining of waterproofing
sheet configuration,
system installation, and
proper detailing.
CONCRETE ADHESION
When performing traditional, postapplied
waterproofing, great care is usually
taken to ensure sufficient adhesion of the
waterproofing membrane to the foundation
walls. The same applies to preapplied
(blindside) installation, but in such
cases, the installation of the waterproofing
membrane occurs long before concrete is
poured. The first contact between membrane
and structural concrete happens
when the concrete is still fluid. The right
conditions must be met so that, once cured,
the concrete will remain tightly bound to
the membrane-exposed surface.
Over the life of the building, degradation
of the materials surrounding the building
(rotting of wood used for lagging being only
one example) can lead to differential settlement
or even soil collapse next to the building
foundation. Under such circumstances,
the waterproofing membrane must remain
adhered to the structural concrete to continue
offering its expected performance.
if adhesion of the membrane to the surrounding
materials is greater than between
membrane and concrete, major failures
may occur.
The chemical reaction of hydration that
happens during concrete curing is exothermic
(it generates heat that increases
concrete temperature). The amount of heat
generated is dependent on many factors,
including the quantity of concrete, which
can be related to slab or wall thickness.
Typical wall thicknesses and depths of
concrete pours will use large volumes of
concrete and generate significant tempera-
Innovative Waterproofing Solutions for
Blind-Side Applications Using Prefabricated
Modified-Bituminous Sheet Membranes
Figure 1 – Blindside waterproofing project in an urban setting.
ture increase at the point of contact with
the membrane. This will soften the sheet’s
exposed surface and enhance adhesion
between concrete and the membrane.
These large quantities of concrete will
also put significant pressure on the interface
with the membrane and allow the
sheet’s rough exposed surface to build a
mechanical bond with the concrete.
if water is able to find its way through a
breach in the membrane, proper adhesion
of the membrane will greatly facilitate remedial
work. On the exterior side of the membrane,
water may be permanently present
and may even generate hydrostatic pressure
from the outside in. if the membrane
is not well adhered to the concrete, water
will be pushed between the membrane and
the concrete to large distances from the
point of entry. This may allow water to enter
the building and will make it more difficult
to investigate the source and location of
the breach. a well-adhered membrane will
block water from traveling in any direction
between membrane and concrete.
PRODUCT DESIGN AND
INSTALLATION
SBS-modified-bitumen prefabricated
sheets are delivered to job sites in rolls.
They are typically manufactured by saturating
and coating a reinforcing mat with
an asphaltic waterproofing compound. The
reinforcing mat provides the sheet with its
mechanical resistance. it must be robust
and allow the membrane to bridge cracks
and resist puncture, among other things.
The asphaltic compound is typically highly
flexible within a large temperature range and
is hydrophobic in nature, which is expected
from a durable waterproofing material.
The surface of the modified-bitumen
sheets that will be in contact with poured
concrete (referred to as “exposed surface”)
is designed to grab firmly to the fluid concrete
and remain adhered to it long after its
cure. in order to allow better compatibility
between the hydrophobic asphaltic compound
and the water-filled concrete slurry,
the asphaltic compound of the exposed
surface may be formulated with adhesiveenhancement
additives. a rough exposed
surface, providing a larger effective contact
area, also contributes to increased adhesion
to concrete through mechanical grab. The
surface materials must also allow the sheet
to be exposed up to several weeks without
degradation due to ultraviolet radiation.
Depending on the area where they will
be used (horizontally under the slab or
vertically around the foundation walls), the
sheets will exhibit slight differences. For
example, both sides of the reinforcing mat
may be coated with the same asphaltic compound
or with two different compounds.
This allows versatility in sheet installation
and lap seaming techniques. a schematic
view of a typical SBS-modified-bitumen
prefabricated sheet is presented in Figure 2.
Horizontal Sheets
The sheets must simply be laid (but
not adhered) on the prepared subgrade.
Adhesion of the sheets to any of the underlying
materials (especially the nonstructural
ones) is generally avoided so that the
best adhesion of the system is achieved
between the exposed surface of the sheets
and the poured concrete, as mentioned
in the Concrete adhesion section above.
Therefore, the bottom face of the sheet is
covered with a nonadhering material or
even a bond breaker.
in areas where the membrane will be
exposed to pedestrian and light mechanical
equipment traffic, it may be required to protect
its exposed surface from constructionrelated
abuse. areas intended to be used
as storage of steel re-bars will also call for
some extra protection. When site conditions
require the use of two plies of waterproofing,
a monolithic membrane will be formed
by heat-welding the plies together.
Vertical Sheets
Sheets intended for vertical installation
have their bottom face compounded with a
self-adhesive bitumen formulation (covered
with a release film). Their exposed surface
will, however, be identical to that of the
horizontal sheets to ensure proper concrete
adhesion. installation of the waterproofing
membrane on the vertical portions is also
quite straightforward. They are very conveniently
self-adhered on the vertical surfaces
surrounding the building footprint. Soldier
piles and wood lagging that were installed at
the time of excavation are actual examples
of these surfaces. The self-adhesive performance
should be sufficient to ensure the
sheets will remain in place until the concrete
has cured.
if a drainage board or other material is
intended to be used on the interior face of
the wall-retaining system, the sheets simply
have to be adhered to this drainage board.
The essential point here is to ensure that
the exposed surface of the waterproofing
sheets will be in contact with poured concrete.
The sheets installed on vertical surfaces
may not be exposed to as much abuse as
those on the horizontal. But they must be
manufactured with a reinforcing mat that
will allow them to withstand the continued
action of gravity before and during concrete
pouring, without stretching and deforming
over time.
1 7 6 • C ô t é e t a l . 3 0 t h R C I I n t e R n a t I o n a l C o n v e n t I o n a n d t R a d e S h ow • M a R C h 5 – 1 0 , 2 0 1 5
Figure 2 – Schematic layered view of an SBS-modified-bitumen prefabricated
sheet. Numbers represent the following: 1 – exposed surface, 2 – top-side asphaltic
compound, 3 – reinforcing mat, 4 – bottom-side asphaltic compound, 5 – sheet
underside (nonadhering material or release film).
LAP SEAMING
To ensure a successful end result, the
waterproofing must be installed so the
membrane is continuous and watertight.
laps must be properly sealed, which is an
easy task with modified-bitumen sheets
since they offer various lap-sealing options.
Heat Welding
laps can be sealed by melting the selvedges
of two adjacent sheets together,
with either a propane burner or a heat gun.
This seaming technique has been used for
decades in the roofing industry.
if both sides of the reinforcing mat are
coated with heat-fusible modified bitumen,
which is usually the case with horizontally
installed sheets, a trained applicator can
perform lap seaming so that only the faces
forming the lap are melted by the heat
source. This ensures that the exposed surface
of the sheet, which will adhere to concrete,
is not altered during lap seaming and
remains receptive to the concrete bonding.
Upon cooling down to ambient temperature,
the lap area becomes monolithic and is
immediately watertight. Furthermore, lap
seams are generally stronger than the rest
of the sheet.
Adhesion
laps can also be adhered with lap
cement or be self-adhered, with the option
of heat-sealing a portion of the lap. Such
an option requires the edge of the sheet to
be equipped with a 1-in.-wide burn-off film.
When assembling the lap, the section of the
lap with the burn-off film needs extra attention.
it is left hanging until the installer lifts
it and heats it to melt/burn the plastic film
and activate the adhesive compound. This
ensures greater
quality for the
lap because of
the reheating
of the adhesive
compound,
which is beneficial—
especially
when installation
occurs in
colder weather.
All lapseaming
techniques
above
allow a small
quantity of
molten asphalt
compound to bleed out from the seam area.
This facilitates inspection of the seams
by the work crew and quality assurance
and control representative. An experienced
installer and/or inspector will recognize (by
the amount of asphalt compound bleeding
out) whether the adequate amount of heat
was provided to the lap during the seaming
operation. See Figure 3.
DETAILING
Pile caps, tiebacks, and other details
must be treated appropriately. in most
cases where modified-bitumen sheets are
used, details can be made using the same
sheet material as the rest of the work.
The detailing will be finished using a
complementary sealing liquid compound,
which can take the form of a bitumen-ure-
3 0 t h RC I I n t e R n a t I o n a l C o n v e n t I o n a n d t R a d e S h ow • M a R C h 5 – 1 0 , 2 0 1 5 C ô t é e t a l . • 1 7 7
Figure 3 – Lap seaming on a vertical portion using a heat gun.
bitumen-urethane liquid membrane
Prefabricated sheet membrane
Figure 4 – Pile caps before and after installation of waterproofing.
thane liquid membrane. This type of material
has the advantage of being formulated
with asphalt and other ingredients that
will ensure there will be no worries about
compatibility between the materials used
around these sensitive areas.
Figure 4 shows typical pile caps requiring
waterproofing and one method of realizing
this task. in this case, the prefabricated
modified-bitumen sheet has been used on
the flat portions, then complemented with
the bitumen-urethane liquid membrane on
the elevation surrounding the steel bars.
The drawing and photograph in Figure
5 show a detail used to allow water capture
from the vertical drainage boards onto
which the waterproofing membrane has
been installed. Such a water-management
method can be inexpensive and uses readily
available accessories. Drained water will
be captured in the pipes (shown in Figure 5)
and connected under the slab to the sump
pit. Water will accumulate in the pit and be
pumped out as needed.
REPAIRS
Despite all precautions taken to protect
the membrane from damage until concrete
is poured, slits, tears, or other defects that
require repairs may be discovered. Damage
to modified-bitumen sheets may be easily
repaired by cutting a piece from an unused
roll (the dimensions of which should be 6
in. greater in all directions from the damaged
section) and applying said piece over
the affected area. The preferred method of
application is by heat welding the entire
piece to the existing sheet. Upon cooling,
the repair will be immediately watertight,
and the installer can quickly allow the continuation
of work.
Monolithic and continuous repairs
ensure watertightness and impermeability
to gases that could be present in the soil,
such as methane.
MEASURING ADHESION
There are several ways to quantify adhesion
between the poured concrete and the
surface of the waterproofing membrane.
laboratory tests can be useful to report this
quantitative property. Peel adhesion tests,
such as those presented in the aSTm D903
standard, are one example of such tests.
But the D903 standard limits its scope to
the conditions of the peel test itself. It does
not specify the preparation of the test specimen;
this would be especially useful for a
system in which uncured concrete is to be
poured on the exposed surface of a waterproofing
sheet.
Specimen preparation during a laboratory
test is critical to ensure that the conditions
for assembly of the concrete-membrane
interface are as close as possible to
those encountered in the field. Pouring only
an inch of concrete at room temperature
on top of a sheet may not be representative
of any real-life condition and could lead to
unrealistic and unsatisfactory peel results.
Proper wetting of the membrane surface by
the concrete, whether obtained by vibration
or other means, also has a significant
impact on adhesion performance. Failure to
replicate adequate wetting conditions when
preparing laboratory specimens can also
lead to abnormal peel-adhesion values.
Concrete should be allowed to cure at
least 14 days for any type of comparative
peel testing, but performing peels as a function
of cure time, starting as early as three
days after pouring, can give information
on adhesion build-up with time, as illustrated
in Figure 6, where two sets of curing
conditions are compared. in both cases,
temperature was controlled inside the room
where the concrete specimens were curing
(15°C and 23°C), but relative humidity was
controlled (at 50%) only in one set.
When specimens are cured and condi-
1 7 8 • C ô t é e t a l . 3 0 t h R C I I n t e R n a t I o n a l C o n v e n t I o n a n d t R a d e S h ow • M a R C h 5 – 1 0 , 2 0 1 5
Figure 5 – Drawing of below-slab water management detail and actual view.
Figure 6 – Comparative evolution of peel adhesion over time under two cure
conditions.
tioned in controlled laboratory settings, peel tests can be performed
as per the D903 standard guidelines. The waterproof
sheet is partially peeled back at a 180º angle from its position.
The end of the piece is then clamped in a constant-rate-ofelongation
recording device that will peel the sheet at a constant
speed of 50 mm per minute, as shown in Figures 7 and 8.
Peel tests between modified-bitumen sheets and poured
concrete performed using D903 will typically generate numbers
in the 3,000 to 4,500 n/m range. These values are sufficiently
high when compared to those obtained when testing the bond
of self-adhesive vertical sheets to a clean and smooth surface.
They ensure that the sheet will remain preferentially adhered
to the poured concrete under all circumstances.
CONCLUSION
Costs incurred for blindside installations have typically
been much higher than conventional (post-applied) waterproofing.
However, using new techniques and low-cost accessories,
incremental costs can be significantly reduced.
modified-bitumen sheet waterproofing membranes have
proven to be effective in blindside applications and provide
tangible benefits due to their ease of detailing and repair and
compatibility with accessory materials; but, more importantly,
they will bond to the poured concrete and remain firmly
adhered.
3 0 t h RC I I n t e R n a t I o n a l C o n v e n t I o n a n d t R a d e S h ow • M a R C h 5 – 1 0 , 2 0 1 5 C ô t é e t a l . • 1 7 9
Figure 7 – Modified-bitumen sheet being
peeled from concrete.
Figure 8 – Modified-bitumen
sheet after six D903 peel tests.