Skip to main content Skip to footer

Masonry Movement Joint Failures

July 5, 2016

Masonry movement joints
are one of the most misunderstood
and underappreciated
technical issues
in the masonry industry.
The lack of properly
located, detailed, specified, and installed
masonry movement joints can result in
“masonry failures.” However, most masonry
deficiencies due to movement issues are
not performance issues with masonry units
or systems, but rather can be attributed to
“design failures.”
WHO IS RESPONSIBLE?
According to the national masonry model
code mandatory requirements checklist for
designers, in the specification section, TMS
602, of “Building Code Requirements and
Specification for Masonry Structures,” (TMS
402/ACI 530/ASCE 5 and TMS 602/ACI
530.1/ASCE 6), Page S-31, Part 3.3 F.7,
designers are required to “indicate type and
location of movement joints on the project
drawings.” Furthermore, TMS 402, Section
6.1.6.3, states it is the responsibility of the
building designer to “design and detail the
veneer to accommodate differential movement.”
CONTROL JOINTS VS. EXPANSION
JOINTS
There are many types of masonry movement
joints and movement control strategies,
but the two most common are control
joints in the concrete masonry unit (CMU)
walls and expansion joints in clay brick
veneers. In the past, when CMU and brick
walls were constructed as bonded composite
walls, control joints and expansion
joints needed to be coordinated and aligned
through both the block and the brick.
In modern masonry cavity walls, these
two different masonry wythes are connected
with flexible connections so control joints
in the CMU backup wall can be located
independently of the expansion joints in
the brick veneer. It is recommended that
structural engineers locate control joints in
structural masonry walls for structural reasons,
while the architects are free to locate
movement joints in the veneer to address
both functional and aesthetic priorities.
COMMON MISTAKES
When masonry structural walls, partitions,
or veneers crack due to a scarcity of
masonry movement joints or their improper
placement, this is a design failure. When
8 • I n t e r f a c e J u l y 2 0 1 6
Figure 1 – Control joints properly located between openings.
masonry cracks occur due to poor workmanship,
then the failure can be attributed
to the mason—but this is not as common.
The main errors designers make when
locating masonry movement joints are:
1. Relying on generic specification language
to locate movement joints
instead of showing them on the
building plans and elevations
2. Locating control joints at the ends
of masonry lintels in vertically reinforced
masonry walls
3. Not understanding movement control
strategies for CMU veneers
4. Not understanding industry recommendations
for locating veneer
movement joints in relation to outside
corners
5. Not locating movement joints at
inside corners
6. Not understanding the use of isolation
joints
7. Not understanding how veneer lintel
type influences placement of vertical
movement joints at or near window
openings
8. Not detailing proper expansion joint
width in clay brick veneers
9. Not having movement joints between
different veneer material types
10. Not having movement joints at window
and door frames
MOVEMENT JOINT MISTAKES
Following are some examples of common
mistakes building designers make when
developing movement control strategies for
masonry walls.
Failure #1: Specifications Approach to
Locating Movement Joints
“Locating” masonry movement joints
with generic specification language does not
give masons enough information to make
decisions about where to locate movement
joints. For example, common specification
language typically does not address different
industry guidelines for movement joints
to be spaced closer in clay brick veneer
with multiple openings as opposed to walls
without any openings. In addition, a general
specifications approach to movement control
may erroneously negate the structural
capacity of masonry if a mason unknowingly
segments a CMU shear wall. Therefore,
it makes sense for the structural engineer
to locate movement joints in structural
masonry walls and the architect to locate
movement joints strategically in the veneer
for both functional and aesthetic reasons.
Failure #2: Vertical Control Joints at
Ends of Masonry Lintels
When masonry lintels are used to span
openings in vertically reinforced masonry
walls, vertical control joints should not be
located at the end of the masonry lintel
when vertical reinforcement is located at
jambs of openings. In this scenario, the
vertical reinforcement at opening jambs
is bonded integrally with the horizontal
reinforcement bar and grout of the masonry
lintel; therefore, a control joint in this
location cannot move properly. In vertically
reinforced masonry walls with masonry lintels,
vertical control joints should be located
between openings, or at least 24 inches
away from the opening, not to exceed 25 feet
on-center (Figure 1).
Failure #3: Not Understanding Concrete
Masonry Veneers
When masonry veneer is comprised of
J u l y 2 0 1 6 I n t e r f a c e • 9
I’M SMALL …
BUT HAVE A
BIG APPETITE
ARE ELECTRICITY PEAK DEMAND CHARGES
TAKING A BITE OUT OF YOUR BUDGET?
With 1,440 minutes in a day, how can usage from just 15 peak-use
minutes account for a third of your energy bill? Utilities charge a much
higher rate for that interval than for the other 99% of the day. Find
out how peak demand charges are computed. Then spend 15 minutes
checking out roof refl ectivity’s role in reducing your energy bill.
PUT DEMAND CHARGES ON A DIET.
LEARN MORE AT VINYLROOFS.ORG/PEAK-ENERGY-DEMAND
CMUs, there are special movement control
guidelines to be considered as outlined in
the National Concrete Masonry Association
(NCMA) TEK 10-4 (2001), “Crack Control for
Concrete Brick and Other Concrete Masonry
Veneers.” These guidelines can be very different
than movement control strategies for
clay brick veneers in some environments
(Figure 2). For example, CMU veneers are
required to have horizontal joint reinforcement
that is not required in clay brick
veneers in certain seismic design categories
and in those with non-stack bond jointing
patterns. Also, vertical movement joints in
CMU veneers are typically spaced closer
than those in clay brick veneers—especially
wall panels less than 14 ft. tall. These additional
and extra veneer movement control
components should be considered when
evaluating the real cost and performance of
a clay versus concrete brick veneer.
Failure #4: Movement Joints at Outside
Corners
Vertical masonry movement joints
should be located on both sides of outside wall corners so that the distance
between them does not exceed the appropriate spacing between
movement joints for that specific project (Figure 3A). Also, when locating a
movement joint near a door or window that is near to the corner, the movement
joint should be located on the corner side of the opening (Figure 3B).
1 0 • I n t e r f a c e J u l y 2 0 1 6
Figure 3B – Crack developed at the corner
because veneer movement joints were spaced
too far away from the corner on both sides.
Figure 3A – This veneer expansion joint should have been
located on the corner side of the opening. The next closest
veneer movement joint to the left of the one shown is 18 ft.
around the corner. This makes the expansion joints 42 ft. apart,
which is too far, resulting in a crack at the corner of the veneer.
24’-0”
Figure 2 – Control joints in this 4-in. CMU veneer were placed 24 ft. off center to
accommodate the clay brick expansion above. CMU control joints, however, should have
been placed no more than 12 ft. off center, with horizontal joint reinforcement in the CMU
spaced appropriately.
Movement joints do not need to be located
at the outside corner of masonry walls. In
fact, doing so will make the masonry wall
look panelized; that will impact the aesthetics
of the building (Figure 4).
Failure #5: Not Locating Movement
Joint at Inside Corners
Unless there are special circumstances,
a good general rule-of-thumb is to put vertical
movement joints at the inside corner
of masonry walls (Figure 5). This is a good
place to start when locating movement
joints on either building plans or elevations.
Then, the distance between them can be
calculated and decisions can be made to
segment the remaining wall length.
Failure #6: Isolation joints
An isolation joint is a movement joint
in masonry walls that separates portions of
walls that have different heights, volume,
loads, and bearing conditions (Figure 6). It
is necessary to install these types of move-
Figure 5 – Corner movement joint with sealant color selected to make it less noticeable.
Figure 4 – A veneer movement joint placed 4 in. from the corner will make masonry look
panelized. A more functional and aesthetically pleasing solution would be to locate the
movement joint at the end of the window lintel, omit the corner movement joint, and then
locate a movement joint further away from the corner, not to exceed 20 ft.
800-771-1711
www.roofhugger.com
Wind Load
Tested
Retrofit by
Celebrating 25 Years with
70 Million Square Feet!
ROOF HUGGER®
• Specified by RCI members nationwide
• Fully-engineered to meet new codes
• Strengthens existing purlins
• CAD details & editable specifications
• Free design and budget estimates
J u l y 2 0 1 6 I n t e r f a c e • 1 1
ment joints to allow differential movement of
adjacent wall or veneer panels.
Failure #7: Veneer Lintels
There are two types of masonry lintels: loose
and fixed. Fixed lintels are those that are connected
to the lintel in the backup wall, as is
typical for larger spans. When masonry veneer
is supported with fixed lintels, a portion of the
veneer will bear on the structural steel, and the
nearby portion of wall will bear on the foundation
or some other bearing point. Therefore, when
portions of the veneer have different bearing
points, they are often separated with a vertical
1 2 • I n t e r f a c e J u l y 2 0 1 6
Figure 6 – The red line denotes location of a crack
due to lack of isolation joint between elevation
segments A and B, which have different bearing
conditions. Segment A bears on steel, and
segment B bears on the foundation below.
Figure 7 – Vertical movement joint properly located at the end of the beam bottom plate that supports the clay brick veneer at the door
opening. Sealant properly installed under drip edge to prevent wind-driven rain penetration.
A
B
movement joint (Figure 7).
There can be exceptions to
this recommendation when
there are stacked openings
with fixed lintels in multistory
elevations.
Failure #8: Expansion
Joint Width
Expansion joints are
movement joints that pass
through materials that
have properties of expansion,
such as clay brick.
With expansive clay bricks
on both sides of an expansion
joint, these joints
should be installed a minimum
of ½ inch wide to
let them reduce down to
3/8 inch to match a typical
mortar joint’s width. In
conditions where oversized
or dark-colored clay brick is specified, in
certain climate zones, when vertical movement
joints are spaced farther apart than
industry recommendations, or when the
brick is less than one year old, expansion
joints may need to be installed even wider
than ½ inch.
Failure #9: Movement Joints at
Different Materials
When bands of differentially moving
materials are used in the same veneer wall
J u l y 2 0 1 6 I n t e r f a c e • 1 3
Masonry Wall Systems
This 1.5-day course is the first specific exterior wall course that builds upon the fundamentals presented
in Exterior Walls Technology and Science. The purpose of this course is to provide an indepth
understanding of masonry wall systems as they are designed as part of the building envelope
system. Highlights of this program include: materials and their properties, masonry accessories,
applicable design codes and standards, design and construction requirements, evaluating and repairing
masonry wall problems, and maintaining masonry walls.
This in-depth course is recommended for those that have taken Exterior Walls Technology and Science
and want to further expand on their knowledge of exterior wall systems. Masonry Wall Systems
will also serve as a good review course for those interested in taking the Registered Exterior
Wall Consultant exam.
An RCI, Inc. Educational Program August 23-24 | Phoenix, AZ
Also offered at the same location: Stucco and Exterior Finish Cladding Systems | August 25-26
12 CEHs | RCI Member Rate: $375
To register, visit: www.rci-online.org/education.html RCI, Inc. 800-828-1902
Figure 8 – Approximately 80% of all CMU units are cracked in the accent bands on this large hospital project
because of differential movement of the shrinking CMU band bonded to large expanses of clay brick veneer.
plane, provisions should be made to accommodate
the differential movement with bond
breaks, back rod, and sealant (Figure 8).
With single-course bands of masonry, care
should be taken to attach masonry bands to
the building either by connecting the band
to the support wall with veneer connectors
in the head joints of the band, or only
breaking the bond at the top joint of the
band. Another strategy for this condition is
to achieve the banding aesthetic with similarly
moving masonry materials of different
size, color, or texture so that there is no
differential movement to address.
Failure #10: Gaps at Windows and Doors
Designers should illustrate and create
dimension gaps at the interface of masonry
veneers with window and doorframes.
Without this dimensioned gap, masons may
build too tightly up against frames, resulting
in inadequate space to install appropriate
backer rod and sealant joint for a properly
proportioned sealant joint (Figure 9).
CONCLUSION
Most cracks in masonry walls are not
“masonry failures,” but rather a failure of
the building designer to adequately specify,
detail, and locate masonry movement
joints in the construction documents. The
code clearly states that it is the responsibility
of the designer—not the mason—to
locate movement joints. Masons do not have
enough information about building loads,
environmental conditions, product specifications,
and aesthetic intent of the designer
to locate movement joints.
Pat Conway is a
registered architect
in Wisconsin and
a member of the
American Institute
of Architects. He
is codirector of
the International
Masonry Institute’s
(IMI’s)
national masonry
technical team,
IMI’s Director of
Architectural Education, a faculty member
of IMI’s Contractor College, and a provider
of Craftworker upgrade courses. Conway is
a frequent lecturer and author on numerous
masonry subjects.
Pat Conway
1 4 • I n t e r f a c e J u l y 2 0 1 6
*Make sure RCI has your current e-mail address. From the RCI home page (rci-online.org),
click on the “Member Login” link on the right. To log onto your member account for the first
time, click “Create Account” in order to create a user name and password. Do not create a new
account, as members already have existing membership records. Under “Personal,” make sure
you have not marked “exclude e-mail.” Now relax…it’s coming soon.
Check your e-mail inbox* around the 20th of each month.
Have you read tems lately?
Missing Something?
Figure 9 – This sealant
joint prematurely failed
because there was no
room to install a backer
rod for a properly
formed sealant joint.
Designers should draw
and dimension a gap
on all four sides of
windows.