Skip to main content Skip to footer

Evolution In The Repair And Restoration of Aged EPDM Roof Systems

May 15, 2007

Good roofing practice has
always been to tear off an
existing roof to the deck
and replace it with new
material, but that is beginning
to change. The time
has come in which tearing off an older roof
may not be the best choice for either the
building owner or the environment.
Sustainability, the latest buzzword in
the commercial roofing industry, is fueling
the desire of building owners to minimize
resource consumption and reduce
landfill usage. The advent of several
forensic diagnostic tools available to
roof consultants is consistent with
the trend of minimizing waste and
extending the life of existing materials.
Now more than ever, consultants
can provide their customers
with multiple options when their
roof systems are in need of repair.
Consultants are increasingly
turning to technologies such as
infrared and nuclear moisture
scans, moisture meters, fastener
pull-out equipment, insulation density
tests, and GPS tools to help
them determine the best option for
aged roofs. When these tools are
used in conjunction with thorough
energy analyses and lifecycle costing,
the best solution becomes clear.
With these technologies, consultants
have the upper hand in providing
their clients with the most logical
and economical roofing solutions for
their aging roof systems.
All of these testing methods and
technologies could not have come at
a better time. Over the past 45 years, EPDM
single-ply roof systems have grown considerably
in market share compared with their
modified bitumen and built-up competition.
As a result, there are many aging EPDM
roofs, and consultants will be faced with the
task of providing cost-effective, durable
solutions to keep the roofs in proper working
order without tearing them off entirely.
Several factors come into play and
impact consultants’ decisions regarding the
end of a roof system’s useful life. Thermal
bridging, proper drainage, R-value, surface
color, wind uplift, and hail resistance are all
important factors to consider. When everything
is taken into account, consultants are
faced with two primary choices when
addressing an aged EPDM roof besides a
complete tear off and replacement: restoration
and re-cover.
1. EPDM roof restoration usually
encompasses reworking the flashings,
seams, and terminations,
Finished view of Martinson Elementary School in Marshfield, Massachusetts. FleeceBACK applied
directly over EPDM using FAST Adhesive made this roof as good as new.
4 • IN T E R FA C E NO V E M B E R 2007
while leaving the field
membrane in place.
EPDM is well known
for its long-term weatherability,
so in most
cases the field membrane
has life remaining.
This option is used
primarily when the
owner wants to extend
the life of the existing
roof or warranty coverage
for an additional
five to ten years.
2. EPDM roof re-covers
provide the ability to
address more issues
than typical restorations.
Proper drainage,
thermal bridging, enhanced
R-value, altered
surface color, as
well as enhanced wind
uplift and hail resistance,
are all issues
that are better addressed
with a roof recover.
In order to meet building
owner needs, professional roof
consultants are becoming fully
educated on energy spending,
environmental issues, and
restoration choices. Each facility
should be analyzed for a myriad of
material choices and should be considered
with regard to structure type and use.
Geographic location of the building relative
to cooling and heating degree days, surrounding
buildings, wind, fire, the existing
maintenance program, maintenance budget
available for washing the roof, and insurance
are just a few of the basic considerations
that must be considered when determining
how to address an aging roof.
The remainder of this article is focused
on accepted practices when considering an
EPDM roof restoration or re-cover. Both
options require a thorough investigation
and that all wet insulation be removed and
replaced.
EPDM Restoration
Because of today’s environmental concerns,
consultants may justifiably choose to
restore an existing roof instead of going
through replacement or full re-cover.
Restoring single-ply systems can be the
most prudent thing for a building owner to
do. The life cycle should not be counted
until the usable life of the roof is really over,
and many single-ply systems are providing
serviceable life well beyond 20 years of age.
When considering restoration options,
one must take into account the type of
membrane. If a building owner originally
selected an economical membrane such as
a 45-mil sheet, then the restoration process
may require a roof coating to extend the life
of the sheet in addition to stripping in the
seams and redoing the flashings.
Over the past several years, coating
technology has advanced significantly.
Today’s coatings are considered viable solutions
to aged, but not failing, systems. Many
roof coatings feature additives that have
NO V E M B E R 2007 I N T E R FA C E • 5
Cover an existing built-up roof and add thermal value by applying additional insulation under the EPDM
membrane. The sheeting shown has factory-applied (seam) tape for faster installation with greater peel
and shear strength.
“After large roof areas are re-covered or
replaced, the ballast can be reloaded onto the
roof by reversing the vacuum and pumping it
back to the rooftop.”
improved the coatings’ weatherability, reflectivity,
and long-term capabilities. These
coatings often come with warranties that
cover the products’ reflectivity and performance,
providing buildings with years of
protection and extended service life.
For buildings that feature a thicker,
more premium membrane such as a 60-,
75-, or 90-mil sheet, restoration procedures
may only have to address the seams and
flashings. Coatings can still be used to
enhance reflectivity, but in many instances,
they are not necessary to enhance the field
membrane’s performance. The old adage of
“pay me now or pay me later” holds true
when it comes to the thickness of some
roofing materials, and it is encouraging that
building owners are increasingly recognizing
the benefits of thicker membranes.
When redoing seams and flashings,
nothing is more important than proper
membrane preparation, regardless of its
thickness. The accepted method of membrane
prep for the area to be stripped in is
to scrub the area using warm water and a
low-sudsing soap such as Spic and Span®,
Tide®, or Lestoil®. After the membrane has
been washed, it must be rinsed with clean
water and given time to dry. Next, a weathered
membrane cleaner and primer coat of
splicing cement must be applied prior to
installing a cured EPDM cover strip that will
ultimately waterproof the seam.
For fully adhered systems with large
areas of delamination, the primary restoration
procedure involves adhering a reinforced
universal securement strip (RUSS) to
the existing membrane and then mechanically
fastening it at 12 inches on center.
RUSS is available in standard and selfadhering
options. It is utilized in perimeter
securement on mechanically fastened, fully
adhered, ballasted, and metal retrofit systems
and can also be installed horizontally
and vertically with seam-fastening plates
below the EPDM deck membrane for additional
securement or in conjunction with
gravel stops and edging details. Many contractors
favor this option over installing
narrow-width perimeter sheets to meet
wind-uplift requirements.
After installing the fasteners and plates,
the upgraded attachment is stripped in with
cured cover strip. For an area with a small
amount of delamination, fasteners can be
installed directly through the existing sheet
and then stripped in with cured cover strip.
6 • IN T E R FA C E NO V E M B E R 2007
Acrylic coatings such as the one being sprayed on here can help extend the life of an old EPDM roof system (Photo courtesy of United Coatings.)
For mechanically fastened systems,
any loose or tented fasteners
should be replaced or resecured
prior to completing the
strip-in process outlined above.
The restoration procedure for
ballasted systems is similar to the
fully adhered and mechanically
attached method; however, the
stone must first be removed from
the areas in need of repair. It
should be noted that rakes or
shovels should not be used, as
they can damage the field membrane.
A gravel pusher or push
broom should be used to clear
approximately 12 inches of area
on each side of the splice. After
the splice has been exposed, the
same strip-in procedures outlined
above can be followed.
For large restoration or full recover
projects, many contractors
utilize a vacuum method to efficiently
remove ballast from the
roofing system. This method utilizes
a Hydro-Vac (industrial vacuum)
that sucks the ballast from
the roof and into a truck or tank
on the ground. After large roof
areas are re-covered or replaced,
the ballast can be reloaded onto
the roof by reversing the vacuum
and pumping it back to the
rooftop. This method creates less
dust and debris within the building
and the surrounding environment,
while allowing the ballast to
be easily reused.
EPDM Roof Re-cover
This option is primarily employed on
adhered and mechanically fastened systems
and is an exciting development in the
roof-repair industry, providing the opportunity
to address more building issues than a
typical restoration. Through today’s innovative
energy-analysis software, it has been
noted that most buildings in the United
States are under-insulated. This is important
in that the cost of energy has gone up
dramatically in the past 10 to 15 years.
Re-cover options afford the opportunity
to add more insulation to the rooftop without
having to tear off the original material.
The insulation can be fastened in place or,
in some cases, adhered directly to the existing
material with a two-component urethane
adhesive. With the recent advancements
in insulation product offerings,
drainage issues can also be addressed with
tapered insulation or crickets prior to the
installation of the new membrane.
Altering the color of a building’s rooftop
is also easier in a re-cover than a restoration.
If a building has a black roof in the south
(where there are more cooling degree-days
than heating degree-days), it makes sense to
consider re-covering the system with a white
membrane. Conversely, if one has a white
roof in the north (where there are more heating
degree-days than cooling degree-days), a
black roof re-cover could be the answer.
The emergence of fleece-backed technology
(a single-ply membrane matted to a
fleece material) has advanced the roof recover
industry. These membranes are an
excellent choice for a roof re-cover, as the
fleece acts as a separator between the new
membrane and the old membrane, while
providing increased puncture- and haildamage
resistance.
This method has been popular for several
years when re-covering asphalt-based
roofing systems, and the technology has
recently been extended to single-ply sys-
NO V E M B E R 2007 I N T E R FA C E • 7
tems. In many cases, the existing EPDM
membrane can be power washed, and then
a fleece-backed membrane can be adhered
directly to the old roof. One can think of this
as a two-ply system that provides dual protection
yet is still much lighter in weight
than many of the alternative multi-ply roofing
systems. Fleece-backed membranes are
typically available in both EPDM and TPO
options of varying thicknesses.
Another option gaining popularity is a
roof-garden re-cover. This allows a new
membrane to be loose-laid on top of the
existing system and then covered with a traditional
or modular garden system. Roof
gardens not only provide an aesthetically
appealing option, but also help reduce a
building’s stormwater runoff and lower its
overall energy cost. Roof gardens can add
significant weight to the structure, so a
structural analysis should be performed
before they are implemented.
As the market for single-ply has grown
over the years, there is an expanding body
of knowledge, techniques, and design
options available to building owners who
are looking to protect their assets, maximize
their return on investment, and be in sync
with the sustainability movement. Restoring
or re-covering an existing roof system
makes sense because the owner and the
environment receive numerous benefits. In
addition to the obvious advantage of a
watertight roof, other benefits of a re-cover
or restoration include extended service life,
less waste generation, less ozone depletion,
little disturbance to building operations,
and the financial advantage of incurring
minimal maintenance costs versus largescale
capital expenses for full replacement.
Investigative tools have improved dramatically
over the past decade, and investigation
techniques are beginning to follow
suit. In the future, system and material
choices will be based on how the roof space
will be used. As consultants continue to
become familiar with the latest technologies,
the process of tearing off an existing roof
may become less and less appealing.
8 • IN T E R FA C E NO V E M B E R 2007
Ron Goodman started with Carlisle SynTec Incorporated in
1982 and has 25 years of experience in the commercial roofing
industry. He earned a bachelor’s degree at Pennsylvania
State University and a master’s degree in business from
Shippensburg University. Ron has been involved in product
development for over 20 years and currently serves as a product
manager for Carlisle.
Ron Goodman
Whether it’s EPDM or TPO, re-cover projects require most of the same
procedures as standard roof installations.