Skip to main content Skip to footer

Metal Roof and Wall Panel Components In Contact With Preservative-Treated Lumber

May 15, 2009

Copper-containing, preservative-
treated lumber is corrosive
toward certain types of
metal roof or wall panels and
most of the recommended
fasteners. With the exception
of copper or copper alloys, where metal roof
or wall panels and accessory materials
must be installed in contact with coppercontaining,
preservative-treated lumber, the
Metal Construction Association (MCA) suggests
the use of a polymeric membrane
material as a barrier between the metal
panel and the wood. In those types of installations,
the choice of compatible metal fasteners
is also critical to the integrity of the
metal roof or wall assembly.
BACKGROUND
Wood preservatives and treatments have
been used for decades to prevent damage by
termites and other insects, decay from
fungi, and damage from fire. One of the
more popular treatments was chromated
copper arsenate (CCA), which was invented
in 1933. It was not widely used until the
late 1960s. At that time, the other preservatives
in use were creosote, made from coaltar;
and pentachlorophenol (penta), which
was an oil-based preservative containing
dioxin.
CCA gained popularity over creosote
and penta because it penetrated wood products
better. However, in 2003, the EPA
announced it would phase out the use of
CCA for residential and consumer applications
because of arsenic in the preservative.
In response, the American Wood Preservers
Association (AWPA) announced a voluntary
change to the formulations of wood preservatives.
Lumber treated with CCA is still
used for guardrail posts and posts in saltwater.
However, it is no longer used for
decking and most applications involving
2 x 4s, 2 x 6s, and other common-dimension
lumber.
The wood preservative industry re –
sponded by offering a new assortment of
treatments that included alkaline copper
quaternary (ACQ), copper azole (CA), and
ammoniacal copper zinc arsenate (ACZA).
These chemicals contain biocides that do
not include arsenic or chromium and are
currently acceptable to the EPA.
The newer products had a similar
appearance and performance compared to
CCA-treated wood. However, it was soon
discovered that they could be twice as corrosive
toward metal, other than copper or
copper alloys, in situations where the lumber
will be exposed to moisture.
CORROSIVITY OF PRESERVATIVE-TREATED LUMBER
Corrosion of metals in an aqueous environment
is an electrochemical process
involving two steps:
1. Water and oxygen must diffuse to
the metal surface, and
2. The reactants must have enough
energy to complete the reaction.
Some of the preservative chemicals
bond to the wood, and a small percentage of
them remain in ionic form in the wood. The
ionic components increase the corrosiveness
of the wood product toward metal. At
higher moisture contents, wood conducts
electricity and ions better; therefore, the
corrosion reaction occurs at a faster rate. It
is believed that corrosion activity within
wood requires a moisture content of 20% or
greater.1
Many of the new preservative formulations
contain twice as much copper as CCA.
Copper ions can accelerate the corrosion of
steel and aluminum.
The potential for corrosion of hardware
in contact with treated wood occurs when
metals in the preservative (such as copper)
are different from the metals in the hardware
(aluminum or the iron in steel). In a
wet environment, these dissimilar metals
create a small electrical current that triggers
a chemical reaction resulting in galvanic
corrosion. This is the challenge in
selecting proper fasteners and connectors
to be used with pressure-treated wood. The
MCA’s Technical Bulletin on Compatibility of
Fasteners with Metal Roof and Wall Panels
addresses this issue for metal panels as follows:
ACQ, Penta, CA, or CBA preservative-
treated lumber can be incompatible
with certain types of fasteners.
In those cases where any
type of metal roof or wall cladding
materials are being attached to
preservative-treated lumber, the
following fasteners are not compatible:
zinc-plated screws, zinc-
30 • I N T E R FA C E F E B R U A RY 2009
alloy-headed screws, stainlesscapped
screws, aluminum, copper,
and copper alloy. Metal panel
fasteners that are compatible with
preservative-treated lumber are
stainless steel fasteners or hotdip
galvanized nails manufactured
to ASTM A 153 class D or
heavier. Other types of fasteners
coated with proprietary anticorrosive
technologies are also available
for use with preservativetreated
lumber.2
INDUSTRY POSITIONS
The manufacturers of the new woodpreservative
chemicals are specific in their
recommendations regarding unpainted galvanized
or Galvalume sheet panels; generally,
they advise that it should not be in
direct, long-term contact with wood that
contains ACQ or other new water-based
preservatives. The preservative manufacturers
recommend stainless steel fasteners or
hot-dipped galvanized fasteners that meet
ASTM International A 153, Standard
Specification for Zinc Coating (Hot-Dip) on
Iron and Steel Hardware. Connectors
should be ASTM A 653, Standard
Specification for Steel Sheet, Zinc-Coated
(Galvanized) or Zinc-Iron Alloy-Coated
(Galvannealed) by the Hot-Dip Process,
Class G185 sheet or better for protection
against the effects of moisture often present
where treated wood is used.
Manufacturers also recommend that
aluminum should not be used in direct contact
with this type of wood. Instead, they
suggest that metal, other than copper or
copper alloys, should be separated from the
treated wood with a physical barrier such
as rubber, vinyl, plastic sheeting, asphalt
roofing paper, or a maintained industrial
coating.3
Wheeling Corrugating
A study by Wheeling Corrugating was
done to determine which kind of barrier
may be effective in preventing the corrosive
attack on metal wall panels.4 The research
was conducted by H.L. Stauver of Touch –
stone Research Laboratory, Ltd., in
Triadelphia, WV. The conclusion from that
study was:
Water and ice shield material was
most effective in preventing a corrosive
reaction between any of the
steel products tested and either
type (ACQ and copper azole) of
pressure-treated lumber. Effec –
tively, there was no surface damage
where the water/ice shield
contacted the metal or painted
surfaces. The use of 30-pound
roofing felt was somewhat effective
in minimizing the corrosion of
the various steel products but
does not appear to offer substantial
improvement over direct
metal-to-wood contact. Direct
con tact with the pressure-treated
lumber grades had the anticipated
effect of corrosion on both the
galvanized products and two of
the painted steel materials, in
that the paint and the base steel
were damaged by direct contact
with the treated lumber… It is
recommended that all galvanized
be protected with water/ice shield
membrane or with a similar product
in any construction.
WWW.PHPSD.COM 800.797.6585
PHP Systems/Design is America’s leading source
for rooftop pipe and equipment support systems.
For over a decade we’ve been strong supporters of
architects, engineers and building managers who
understand what it means to build it right.
We pioneered the original Zero Penetrations
support system – allowing our customers
limitless support options without jeopardizing their existing
roof warranties.
With professional, high-integrity, code-compliant
designs and engineering, PHP is changing the way
people view their rooftop supports. Let us help you
with your next challenge. PSE-Custom
> Pipe Supports
> Duct Supports
> Cable Tray Supports
> Equipment Supports
JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN,
DOESN’T MEAN YOU SHOULD.
> Platforms & Walkways
> Crossovers & Ramps
> Telecommunication Supports
> Seismic & High Wind Applications
F E B R U A RY 2009 I N T E R FA C E • 3 1
U.S. Steel
U.S. Steel has also tested preservativetreated
lumber in contact with architectural
sheet steel products commonly used for
metal roofing and siding applications. Those
products included G90, Galvalume, acryliccoated
Galvalume, prepainted HDG, and
prepainted Galvalume. The preservativetreated
lumber included CCA and ACQ
chemicals. The results showed that ACQ
was generally more corrosive to most coated
steel products.
They concluded that isolating the steel
from preservative-treated wood by using
water-resistant barrier materials is an
effective way to minimize corrosion. Those
types of materials would include peel-andstick
polymeric membranes, polymer tapes,
and masking and lining materials. They
also concluded that isolating materials with
a paper or felt component should be avoided
since these products can retain moisture,
which can increase corrosion.5
National Frame Builders Association
Most metal component manufacturers
recommend that panels or flashing should
not come into contact with preservativetreated
wood. Many manufacturers recommend
installing a barrier material that will
stop all electrical current between the treated
lumber and metal. Furthermore, NFBA
suggests that water should not drain from
treated wood onto panels or flashing.6
National Roofing Contractors
Association
The NRCA recognizes the lack of longterm
corrosion performance of newer preservative-
treated lumber in contact with metal
fasteners, panels, and flashing. The association’s
guidelines include the following:
Aluminum fasteners, flashings,
and accessory products should
not be used in direct contact with
any treated wood. ACQ-treated
wood is not compatible with aluminum.
Uncoated metal and painted
metal flashings and accessories,
except for 300-series stainless
steel, should not be used in direct
contact with treated wood. Metal
products, except stainless steel,
may be used if separated from
treated wood by a spacer or barrier,
such as single-ply membrane
or self-adhered, polymer-modified
bitumen membrane material.7
NRCA also states, “In many instances,
the use of nontreated, construction-grade
wood is suitable for use in roof assemblies
as blocking or nailers, provided reasonable
measures are taken to ensure the nontreated
wood remains reasonably dry when in
service. Where a specific construction detail
provides for a secondary means of waterproofing,
NRCA now considers the use of
nontreated, construction-grade wood to be
an acceptable substitute for treated wood.”
Steel Deck Institute
The SDI conducted tests of G60, G90,
and primed steel deck in contact with ACQ
and copper azole preservative-treated lumber.
SDI also evaluated the performance
with a barrier between the pressure-treated
lumber and the steel specimens. The barriers
were 30-pound felt paper and water/ice
shield. Using the AWPA procedure E12,
“Standard Method for Determining Corro –
sion of Metal in Contact with Treated
Wood,” the SDI found the following:
The use of water- and-ice-shield
material was most effective in
preventing a corrosive reaction
between any of the steel products
tested and either type of pressure-
treated lumber. Effectively,
there was no surface damage
where the water/ice shield contacted
the metal or painted surfaces.
The use of 30-pound roofing
felt was somewhat effective in
minimizing the corrosion of the
various steel products but does
not appear to offer substantial
improvement over direct metalto-
wood contact. Direct contact
with the pressure-treated lumber
grades had the anticipated effect
of corrosion on both the galvanized
products and the painted
steel materials, in that the zinc
coating and/or the paint and the
base steel were damaged by direct
contact with the treated lumber.8
As a result, the Steel Deck Institute recommends
a barrier of water-and-ice shield
or equivalent be used between pressuretreated
lumber and steel deck products or
accessories.
MCA COMMENTS
Based on the contents of this position
paper, it is clear that the use of copper-containing,
preservative-treated wood would be
corrosive to certain types of metal and affect
the long-term integrity and performance of
a metal roof or wall system. Generally, ACQ
and other copper-containing, preservativetreated
lumber should not be used in direct
contact with metal components (other than
copper or copper alloys) where moisture will
be present. The only way to avoid corrosion
in those circumstances would be to install a
special and costly barrier between the metal
roof or wall panel and the pressure-treated
wood.
With the exception of copper or copper
alloys, where metal roof or wall panels and
accessory materials must be installed in
contact with copper-containing, preservative-
treated lumber, the Metal Construction
Association suggests the use of a polymeric
membrane material as a barrier between
the metal panel and the wood. Until longterm
performance data are available, the
MCA cannot recommend the use of copperfree
wood preservatives (e.g., borates) in
direct contact with metal roofing or wall
panels.
The Metal Construction Association will
continue to monitor the recommendations
from the wood preservative industry before
completing its investigation and making any
final recommendations.
REFERENCES
1 K. Flynn, S. Quarles, and J. Shelly,
Non-Biological Deterioration of Wood,
Forest Products Laboratory, Univer –
sity of California, 1995.
2 Fastener Selection Guideline, Metal
Construction Association Technical
Bulletin, May 2008.
3 H. DeVenzio, “Treated Wood,” The
Construction Specifier, May 2005.
4 “Tests Shed Light on Corrosion,”
Rural Builder, May 2005.
5 “ACQ Pressure-Treated Lumber
Effect on Sheet Steel,” United States
Steel Corporation Technical Bulle –
tin, TBP 2005.19.
6 Pressure-Treated Wood for Post-
Frame Construction, National Frame
Building Association.
7 Use of Treated Wood in Roof Assem –
blies, National Roofing Contractors
Association, February, 2005.
8 Steel Deck Products in Contact with
Pressure-Treated Lumber, Steel Deck
Institute Position Statement, August
2006.
32 • I N T E R FA C E F E B R U A RY 2009