Skip to main content Skip to footer

Rooftop Equipment Supports

May 15, 2009

Rooftops have commonly been
used as a haven for the
installation of various pieces
of equipment with the mentality,
“We have nowhere else
to put them,” or “Let’s just
put it up on the roof,” with very little
thought or concern with the overall possible
impact they could have on the service
life or performance of the
roof. A variety of items installed
on roofs commonly include but
are not limited to the following:
HVAC equipment, communication
equipment, packaged units, compressors,
ducting, antennae,
satellite dishes, security cameras,
lighting assemblies, and a variety
of associated piping and cabling.
These items, how they are supported,
and the improper installation
of said items can have a significant
effect on the performance
of a roof system. See Figure 1.
There are generally three different
methods for supporting the
various items, including: 1)
flashed curbs, 2) flashed steel
supports, and 3) nonpenetrating
supports. The NRCA-recommended
details for supporting rooftop
items involve two basic concepts.
One consists of rooftop curbs
flashed into the roof membrane
with a sheet metal cap (NRCA
Detail Sheets “N: Curb Detail,” “L-2:
Equipment of Sign Support,” “S: Pipe Roller
Support”). The second concept consists of
structural steel vertical posts supporting a
structural steel framework (NRCA Detail
Sheets “M-1/M-2: Mechanical Equipment
Stand,” “Q: Structural Member”). See
Figures 2 and 3.
CURBS
A flashed curb is typically constructed
in two fashions: 1) individual curbs, sometimes
referred to as “runners,” and
2) square/rectangular- or box-shaped
curbs. The individual curbs are typically
positioned at each end or along the sides of
the item or piece of equipment to be sup-
Figure 1 – Overview of rooftop equipment.
16 • I N T E R FA C E OC T O B E R 2009
ported (Figure 4). An additional
individual curb can
also be positioned at midspan
of the item, depending
on its actual size or weight.
For rooftop piping, the individual
curbs are typically
positioned approximately 5
to 10 ft on-center. The pipes
are either placed directly on
top of the curbs or on some
type of steel support structure
such as a roller or saddle
that is anchored to the
top of the curb.
When installed by a
roofing contractor, the
curbs can be constructed in
the field using 2x dimensional
lumber or shop-fabricated
sheet metal. Pre man –
ufactured curbs constructed
from sheet metal (commonly
16 gauge) are also
readily available from various
suppliers. These types
of curbs are commonly
made from galvanized sheet
Figure 2 – NRCA Detail M-2. Figure 3 – NRCA Detail Q.
Figure 4 – Equipment installed on curbs/runners.
OC T O B E R 2009 I N T E R FA C E • 1 7
metal of various heights, 12 to 18 in, with
canted or straight vertical legs. A wood nailer
and metal cap are also often provided on
top of these curbs. See Figure 5.
A box-shaped curb or frame can also be
constructed using 2x dimensional lumber
or purchased as a premanufactured unit to
function as a support for various equipment.
The curb can be left open to provide
projections through the deck, or it can be
provided with a cover (either plywood or
metal cap). Equipment is then positioned on
top of the cover/cap and
either relies on dead
weight of the item or is
anchored directly to the
curb. These types of
curbs are commercially
available from several
manufacturers such as
ThyCurb, Portals Plus,
etc.
STEEL SUPPORTS
Structural steel
framework is typically
utilized to support relatively
large or heavy
equipment and items
such as cooling towers,
storage tanks, generators,
satellite dishes,
etc., but also could be
used to support other
rooftop items. A variety of steel shapes are
used for constructing the vertical supports,
including round shapes (pipes or posts),
square-shaped tubes, wide flange shapes (Ibeams),
channels (“C” shapes), and angles.
Light-gauge steel struts, such as “Unistrut,”
are also used to support items more commonly
associated with electrical related
components such as disconnect boxes.
For ease of constructing proper flashings,
the preferred
support
shape is the cylindrical version or a pipe or
post. A shop-fabricated sheet metal base or
flashing pan can be installed around the
post and then sealed with a pourable elastomeric
sealant applied over a nonshrink,
grout-based material. A sheet metal
umbrella/bonnet is then attached to the
post with a steel draw band (Figure 6). The
bonnet functions as the initial line of
defense against water infiltration and also
provides protection to the pourable sealant
from exposure to weathering elements
and/or contaminants.
A square-shaped post is the next preferred
support type with the utilization of a
steel base. The sheet metal umbrella
/bonnet can be secured to the square tube
with self-drilling or tapping fasteners,
preferably with a continuous termination
bar. A steel bonnet could also be welded to
the outer sides of the tube. The welded type
of bonnet is less desirable (unless made as
a two-piece assembly) than the screwattached
style for ease of removal for performing
rooftop maintenance or for future
roof replacement activities.
The various structural steel shapes,
such as I-beams, channels, and angles,
provide more difficult flashing conditions.
Similar to the other penetrating supports, a
steel base/pan can be installed around the
support to provide the integral flashing sys-
Figure 5 – Premanufactured equipment curb detail.
Figure 6 – Sheet metal pan and bonnet installed at round post.
18 • I N T E R FA C E OC T O B E R 2009
Figure 7 – Sheet metal bonnet installed at I-beam.
tem into the roof membrane, and a steel
bonnet can be welded to the support (Figure
7). Several manufacturers, such as Portals
Plus, SBS Industries, etc., offer specialty
products that are produced to provide premanufactured
flashing assemblies around
these difficult shapes. The two-piece sheet
metal flashing assembly is recommended
regardless of the shape of the penetrating
support.
Other products have been developed
and promoted to provide options for constructing
flashings around various penetrating
supports. One of these products
consists of premolded,
rubber/polymercomposite,
two-piece
interlocking curbs or
“doughnuts.” The
doughnut is placed
in sealant directly on
top of the roof membrane
surface and
encircles the penetrating
element. An
elastomeric filler or
pourable sealer is
then installed within
the doughnut in a
fashion similar to
that of a pitch pan
(Figure 8). Since the
sealer within the
assembly remains exposed, achieving a
proper bond of the sealant to the penetrating
element is critical for long-term, watertight
performance. Manufacturers of this
type of system include Chem-Link’s “Chem-
Curb” and Millenium’s “Lockin Pocket.”
Another available flashing system consists
of a liquid-applied coating, together
with a reinforcing fabric. This system
involves applying the coating system (liquid
coating and embedded fabric) to the penetrating
element and onto the roof membrane
surface around the penetration to
form a monolithic seal (Figure 9). Commonly
Roofing contractors &
specifiers choose Durapax
coal tar roofing systems.
Coal Tar:
First Choice for Flat Roofs
Durapax:
First Choice in Coal Tar
610.579.9075 Durapax.com
• Coal tar roofing provides low cost and
long life (25+ years)
• Many coal tar roofs last more than
50 years
• Coal tar’s cold flow properties provide
self-healing
• Superior technical & customer support
• Delivery you can depend on
• Comprehensive warranties
• UL & FM approved systems
Specify your next flat roof with a
Durapax coal tar roofing system.
Figure 8 – Pre-manufactured penetration seal (“doughnut”) installed at steel support.
Figure 9 – Liquid flashing membrane installed at steel support.
OC T O B E R 2009 I N T E R FA C E • 1 9
available systems include “TeraPro” by
Siplast, “Kemperol” by Kemper, and “Alsan”
by Soprema. It may be possible that the
coating flashing systems and the penetration
pockets can be included in the coverage
of the roof system warranty that would be
provided by the roofing material manufacturer.
NONPENETRATING SUPPORTS
Another option for supporting various
rooftop items is assemblies that do not penetrate
the roof membrane, commonly
referred to as nonpenetrating supports.
These supports range from basic wood
blocking to engineered, pre-manufactured,
steel strut assemblies. These nonpenetrating
elements are placed on top of the
roof surface with some type of protection/
separation pad typically placed
between the bottom of the support
and the actual surface of the roof
membrane/covering. Four-by-four di –
mensional treated or redwood lumber
blocking is typically used and cut to a
specific length to suit the application.
Two-by-four dimensional treated lumber,
stacked or individually, can also
be utilized. When utilized as a
pipe support, the pipes are placed
directly on top of the blocking and
then sometimes secured in place
with a sheet metal strap (i.e. conduit
clamp or shop-fabricated
metal straps). Wood blocking is
commonly used to support rooftop
piping such as electrical conduits,
condensate drain pipes, gas pipes,
and equipment. Wood blocking is
also used to support other rooftop
equipment, such as condensers,
packaged units, etc. (Figure 10).
Some obvious issues associated
with wood blocking include deterioration
and warping of the wood.
Additionally, wood blocking will
typically not allow for adequate
movement and/or load distribution,
which can result in damage
to the roof, even with the installation
of protection pads (Figure 11).
A wide variety of pre-manufactured,
nonpenetrating assemblies
is also available, ranging in style
and materials. Some common
available products include ABS plastic saddles,
sheet metal discs, and steel strut
assemblies. These supports can be provided
Figure 10 – Equipment installed on top of 4×4 wood sleeper.
Figure 11 – Damage to roof from
movement of piping and support.
20 • I N T E R FA C E OC T O B E R 2009
Figure 12 – Typical premanufactured
pipe
support detail.
with either a bar or roller component to
support the respective piping (Figure 12).
For larger types of pipes, such as insulated
hot-water pipes, assemblies can be
constructed in a standlike fashion with clevis,
rollers, or saddle hangers suspended
with threaded rods. The stands are commonly
constructed with C-shaped steel
struts (UniStrut) assembled with horizontal
cross members and vertical support posts
that are adjoined with brackets, angles,
and/or gusset plates and installed with
some type of prefabricated base to support
the equipment and distribute the loads on
the roof.
Assemblies are also available to support
the various types of equipment that are
often encountered on rooftops (Figure 13).
Walkways, stair assemblies, crossovers,
and assorted types of stands are available
or can be customized to suit the application.
These assemblies can be viewed as
similar to erector sets for the roofing industry.
A unique feature of the strut assemblies
is the ability to customize each individual
support to suit the existing size, number,
direction, and/or configuration of the piping/
equipment and rooftop conditions.
These assemblies can also be engineered in
order to provide suitable support for the
respective item while minimizing the impact
on the roof (Figure 14).
SUMMARY
The decision to use curbs, penetrating
steel supports, or nonpenetrating supports
depends on several variables, including but
Figure 13 – Mechanical equipment installed on pre-manufactured support.
Roof Drainage Design
NEW e-LEARNING PROGRAM:
[This is Not a Proper Exit] RCI, Inc. 800-828-1902 Enroll today
@ rci-e-learning.org
Topics include:
􀂇􀀃􀀃􀀵􀁒􀁒􀁉􀀃􀀶􀁏􀁒􀁓􀁈􀀃􀁗􀁒􀀃􀀧􀁕􀁄􀁌􀁑􀁖
􀂇􀀃􀀃􀀶􀁌􀁝􀁌􀁑􀁊􀀃􀀨􀁛􀁗􀁈􀁕􀁌􀁒􀁕􀀃􀀧􀁕􀁄􀁌􀁑􀁖􀀃􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀀪􀁘􀁗􀁗􀁈􀁕􀁖
􀂇􀀃􀀃􀀶􀁌􀁝􀁌􀁑􀁊􀀃􀀬􀁑􀁗􀁈􀁕􀁌􀁒􀁕􀀃􀀧􀁕􀁄􀁌􀁑􀁖
􀂇􀀃􀀃􀀶􀁆􀁘􀁓􀁓􀁈􀁕􀀃􀀶􀁌􀁝􀁌􀁑􀁊
Students will learn to:
􀂇􀀃􀀃􀀸􀁑􀁇􀁈􀁕􀁖􀁗􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀁗􀁋􀁈􀀃􀁊􀁘􀁌􀁇􀁈􀁏􀁌􀁑􀁈􀁖􀀃􀁉􀁒􀁕􀀃􀁕􀁒􀁒􀁉􀀃􀀃􀁇􀁈􀁖􀁌􀁊􀁑􀀃􀀃􀀃
􀀃􀀃􀀃􀀃􀁗􀁒􀀃􀁐􀁒􀁙􀁈􀀃􀁚􀁄􀁗􀁈􀁕􀀃􀁗􀁒􀀃􀁇􀁕􀁄􀁌􀁑􀁖
􀂇􀀃􀀃􀀶􀁌􀁝􀁈􀀃􀁊􀁘􀁗􀁗􀁈􀁕􀁖􀀃􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀁇􀁒􀁚􀁑􀁖􀁓􀁒􀁘􀁗􀁖􀀃􀁓􀁈􀁕􀀃􀁆􀁒􀁇􀁈􀀃􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀀃􀀃
􀀃􀀃􀀃􀀃􀁌􀁑􀁗􀁈􀁑􀁇􀁈􀁇􀀃􀁘􀁖􀁈
􀂇􀀃􀀃􀀶􀁌􀁝􀁈􀀃􀁓􀁕􀁌􀁐􀁄􀁕􀁜􀀃􀁌􀁑􀁗􀁈􀁕􀁌􀁒􀁕􀀃􀁇􀁕􀁄􀁌􀁑􀁖
􀂇􀀃􀀃􀀸􀁑􀁇􀁈􀁕􀁖􀁗􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀁕􀁈􀁔􀁘􀁌􀁕􀁈􀁐􀁈􀁑􀁗􀁖􀀃􀁉􀁒􀁕􀀃􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀁖􀁌􀁝􀁌􀁑􀁊􀀃􀁒􀁉􀀃􀀃
􀀃􀀃􀀃􀀃􀁖􀁈􀁆􀁒􀁑􀁇􀁄􀁕􀁜􀀃􀁇􀁕􀁄􀁌􀁑􀁄􀁊􀁈
􀂇􀀃􀀃􀀶􀁌􀁝􀁈􀀃􀁖􀁆􀁘􀁓􀁓􀁈􀁕􀁖􀀃􀁄􀁓􀁓􀁕􀁒􀁓􀁕􀁌􀁄􀁗􀁈􀁏􀁜􀀃􀁉􀁒􀁕􀀃􀁓􀁕􀁌􀁐􀁄􀁕􀁜􀀃􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀀃
􀀃􀀃􀀃􀀃􀁖􀁈􀁆􀁒􀁑􀁇􀁄􀁕􀁜􀀃􀁇􀁕􀁄􀁌􀁑􀁄􀁊􀁈
􀀷􀁋􀁈􀀃􀁑􀁈􀁚􀀃􀀵􀁒􀁒􀁉􀀃􀀧􀁕􀁄􀁌􀁑􀁄􀁊􀁈􀀃􀀧􀁈􀁖􀁌􀁊􀁑􀀃􀁈􀀐􀁏􀁈􀁄􀁕􀁑􀁌􀁑􀁊􀀃􀁆􀁒􀁘􀁕􀁖􀁈􀀃􀁌􀁖􀀃􀁇􀁈􀁖􀁌􀁊􀁑􀁈􀁇􀀃􀁉􀁒􀁕􀀃􀁓􀁕􀁄􀁆􀁗􀁌􀁆􀁌􀁑􀁊􀀃􀁆􀁒􀁑􀁖􀁘􀁏􀁗􀁄􀁑􀁗􀁖􀀏􀀃􀁄􀁕􀁆􀁋􀁌􀁗􀁈􀁆􀁗􀁖􀀏􀀃􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀁈􀁑􀁊􀁌􀁑􀁈􀁈􀁕􀁖􀀃􀁚􀁋􀁒􀀃
􀁇􀁈􀁖􀁌􀁕􀁈􀀃􀁗􀁒􀀃􀁅􀁈􀁆􀁒􀁐􀁈􀀃􀁐􀁒􀁕􀁈􀀃􀁎􀁑􀁒􀁚􀁏􀁈􀁇􀁊􀁈􀁄􀁅􀁏􀁈􀀃􀁄􀁅􀁒􀁘􀁗􀀃􀁇􀁈􀁖􀁌􀁊􀁑􀁌􀁑􀁊􀀃􀁕􀁒􀁒􀁉􀀃􀁇􀁕􀁄􀁌􀁑􀁄􀁊􀁈􀀃􀁖􀁜􀁖􀁗􀁈􀁐􀁖􀀃􀁗􀁒􀀃􀁅􀁈􀀃􀁉􀁘􀁑􀁆􀁗􀁌􀁒􀁑􀁄􀁏􀀃􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀁗􀁒􀀃􀁐􀁈􀁈􀁗􀀃􀁆􀁒􀁇􀁈􀀑
􀀃
􀀃
􀁇􀁈􀁖􀁌􀁕􀁈􀀃􀁗􀁒􀀃􀁅 􀀵
􀀷􀁋􀁈 􀁑􀁈􀁚􀀃
􀁈􀁆􀁒􀁐􀁈􀀃􀁐􀁒􀁕􀁈􀀃􀁎􀁑􀁒􀁚􀁏􀁈􀁇􀁊􀁈􀁄􀁅􀁏􀁈􀀃􀁄􀁅􀁒
􀀵􀁒􀁒􀁉􀀃􀀧􀁕􀁄􀁌􀁑􀁄􀁊􀁈 􀀧􀁈􀁖􀁌􀁊􀁑 􀁈􀀐􀁏􀁈􀁄􀁕􀁑􀁌􀁑􀁊
LEA
􀁒􀁘􀁗􀀃􀁇􀁈􀁖􀁌􀁊􀁑􀁌􀁑􀁊􀀃􀁕􀁒􀁒􀁉􀀃􀁇􀁕􀁄􀁌􀁑􀁄􀁊􀁈􀀃􀁖􀁜􀁖􀁗
􀁊 􀁆􀁒􀁘􀁕􀁖􀁈􀀃􀁌􀁖 􀁇􀁈􀁖􀁌􀁊􀁑􀁈􀁇􀀃􀁉􀁒􀁕􀀃􀁓􀁕􀁄􀁆􀁗􀁌􀁆􀁌􀁑
ARNING PROG
􀁗􀁈􀁐􀁖􀀃􀁗􀁒􀀃􀁅􀁈􀀃􀁉􀁘􀁑􀁆􀁗􀁌􀁒􀁑􀁄􀁏􀀃􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀁗􀁒􀀃􀁐􀁈􀁈
􀁑􀁊􀀃􀁆􀁒􀁑􀁖􀁘􀁏􀁗􀁄􀁑􀁗􀁖􀀏 􀁄􀁕􀁆􀁋􀁌􀁗􀁈􀁆􀁗􀁖􀀏􀀃􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀁈􀁑
GRAM:
􀁈􀁗􀀃􀁆􀁒􀁇􀁈􀀑
􀁑􀁊􀁌􀁑􀁈􀁈􀁕􀁖 􀁚􀁋􀁒
􀀃
􀀃
􀁌 􀁗 􀁇 􀁇
􀂇􀀃􀀃􀀶􀁌􀁝􀁈􀀃􀁊􀁘􀁗􀁗􀁈􀁕􀁖􀀃􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀁇􀁒􀁚􀁑􀁖􀁓􀁒􀁘􀁗􀁖􀀃􀁓
􀀃􀀃􀀃􀁗􀁒􀀃􀁐􀁒􀁙􀁈􀀃􀁚􀁄􀁗􀁈􀁕􀀃􀁗􀁒􀀃􀁇􀁕􀁄􀁌􀁑􀁖
􀂇􀀃􀀃􀀸􀁑􀁇􀁈􀁕􀁖􀁗􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀁗􀁋􀁈􀀃􀁊􀁘􀁌􀁇􀁈􀁏􀁌􀁑􀁈􀁖􀀃􀁉􀁒􀁕􀀃
􀂇􀀃􀀃􀀶􀁌􀁝􀁌􀁑􀁊􀀃􀀨􀁛􀁗􀁈􀁕􀁌􀁒􀁕􀀃􀀧􀁕􀁄􀁌􀁑􀁖􀀃􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀀪􀁘
􀁓􀁈􀁕􀀃􀁆􀁒􀁇􀁈􀀃􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀀃
􀁕􀁒􀁒􀁉􀀃􀀃􀁇􀁈􀁖􀁌􀁊􀁑􀀃􀀃
􀁘􀁗􀁗􀁈􀁕􀁖
8
y 􀀃􀀃􀀃􀁖􀁈􀁆􀁒􀁑􀁇􀁄􀁕􀁜􀀃􀁇􀁕􀁄􀁌􀁑􀁄􀁊􀁈
􀂇􀀃􀀃􀀶􀁌􀁝􀁈􀀃􀁖􀁆􀁘􀁓􀁓􀁈􀁕􀁖􀀃􀁄􀁓􀁓􀁕􀁒􀁓􀁕􀁌􀁄􀁗􀁈􀁏􀁜􀀃􀁉􀁒
􀀃􀀃􀀃􀁖􀁈􀁆􀁒􀁑􀁇􀁄􀁕􀁜􀀃􀁇􀁕􀁄􀁌􀁑􀁄􀁊􀁈
􀂇􀀃􀀃􀀸􀁑􀁇􀁈􀁕􀁖􀁗􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀁕􀁈􀁔􀁘􀁌􀁕􀁈􀁐􀁈􀁑􀁗􀁖􀀃􀁉􀁒􀁕􀀃􀁄
􀀃􀀃􀀃􀁌􀁑􀁗􀁈􀁑􀁇􀁈􀁇􀀃􀁘􀁖􀁈
􀁒􀁕􀀃􀁓􀁕􀁌􀁐􀁄􀁕􀁜􀀃􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀀃
􀁄􀁑􀁇􀀃􀁖􀁌􀁝􀁌􀁑􀁊􀀃􀁒􀁉􀀃
OC T O B E R 2009 I N T E R FA C E • 2 1
22 • I N T E R FA C E OC T O B E R 2009
not limited to the following: budget constraints,
anticipated load capacity, owner
and project requirements (wind/seismic
loading), designer or installer preferences,
and site constraints or limitations.
Some common issues regarding penetrating
supports include:
1) Creation of additional penetrations
in the roof membrane results in
additional potential leak sources.
2) These types of supports are less flexible
in regard to modifications or
changes associated with adding,
eliminating, or revising the piping
and/or equipment.
3) This type of assembly can provide
structurally sound supports for the
piping/equipment that can adequately
handle the necessary dead
loads or seismic loads and/or movement/
vibrations.
Common issues related to the nonpenetrating
supports are:
1) Some of these assemblies (i.e., wood
blocking) typically cannot allow for
proper movement of piping, consequently
resulting in possible damage
to the underlying membrane.
2) These supports may not provide
proper capacity for the element
involved.
3) These supports can be readily
rearranged and/or modified to
adapt to changes in the piping and
equipment.
4) The more “sophisticated” assemblies
can be engineered to meet the necessary
loading requirements or load
distribution and can be installed
directly by the manufacturer’s personnel.
Over the past 10 years, the roofing
industry has experienced a proliferation of a
wide variety of products, assemblies, materials,
and/or systems to offer solutions for
supporting equipment and/or flashings of
such supports. Whichever system or option
is selected for supporting rooftop items and
their related flashings should be properly
designed, installed, and maintained in
order to provide optimum solutions with
the least impact to the roof covering. Just
as with roofing materials, improper installation
can result in physical damage to the
roof covering, resulting in moisture infiltration.
REFERENCE
NRCA Roofing & Waterproofing Manual
Karl A. Schaack, RRC, PE, is president of Price Consulting,
Inc., a roofing and waterproofing consulting firm in Houston,
Texas. Mr. Schaack has a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering
from Clemson University. He is a registered professional
engineer in Texas, South Carolina, and North Carolina. Karl
is a member of RCI, the Roofing Contractors Association of
Texas, and the Gulf Coast Chapter of RCI. Karl is a former
director of RCI’s original Region IV and was the 2007 recipient
of RCI’s prestigious Richard M. Horowitz Award for outstanding
contribution to Interface journal.
Karl A. Schaack, RRC, PE
One silver lining in the downtrend of construction? Fewer deaths. The latest annual census report by the U.S. Labor
Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) shows there were 969 fatalities in the construction industry in 2008 – down 20%
from 2007, but still the largest total among U.S. industries. The death rate in the industry fell to 9.6 per 100,000 full-time-equivalent
workers in 2008 from 10.8 the previous year. While construction had the highest fatality numbers overall, it was third highest
per worker, surpassed once again by the agriculture-forestry-fishing-hunting sector, with 29.4 per 100,000; and manufacturing
and utilities, 18.0 per 100,000.
It was noted, however, that part of the decrease may also be that the demographic mix has also shifted in the past year.
Seventeen percent fewer Hispanic workers were in the construction industry between 2007 and 2008, and Hispanics have a
higher fatality rate than other workers.
Across all industries, total fatal workplace injuries in 2008 were down 10% to 5,071, the lowest annual figure since the BLS
began its census in 1992. The fatal-injury rate also declined, from 4.0 to 3.6.
Figure 14 – Satellite dish installed on premanufactured support.
CONSTRUCTION DEATHS DECLINE