Skip to main content Skip to footer

Roof Decks A to Z Part IV: Poured Gypsum

May 15, 2012

Abstr act
This is the fourth in a series of articles
examining various deck types. Among the
numerous considerations when selecting a
roof system, the type of decking is one of the
most important. With the variety of decks
to be encountered (both new and old), it is
incumbent upon roofing experts to be the
authority on these matters. This article will
explore features of poured gypsum.
In decades past, poured gypsum enjoyed
a significant niche of the roof deck marketplace.
Such assemblies were credited with
excellent fire performance and low sound
transmission, and they were quite compatible
with built-up roofing, the apparent
system of choice at the time. They are rarely
seen in new construction of modern projects,
however, and that increasing obscurity
is the cause for confusion on several fronts.
The author has often witnessed this type
of deck being mistaken for other cementitious
substrates. As poured decks go,
gypsum may indeed be lighter weight than
structural concrete, but it is by no means
lightweight concrete, vermiculite concrete,
or insulating concrete and should not be
confused with these. There are several ways
to distinguish gypsum decks, and positive
identification should certainly be made
before fasteners and coverings are selected.
For instance, there are three principal
types of formboard used for gypsum decks.
They are 1) compressed fiberglass, 2) compressed
wood fiber, or 3) gypsum formboard
(similar to drywall). These may occasionally
be arranged in more than one layer.
(Asbestos planks have also been used as
formboards on some occasions—especially
along eave overhangs—so the diligent practitioner
would take notice.) Formboards are
carried on a system of iron subframing girts
called bulb tees, truss tees, or cold-rolled
tees, which are situated across primary
framing supports—usually steel (Figure 1).
The aggregate for gypsum is also unique:
there is none. The product is really nothing
more than plaster of Paris; there is no sand,
no air entrainment, no vermiculite, and no
coarse aggregate. Instead, wood shavings
(particles) are mixed into the slurry, serving
only as an extender. Slicing through a sample
cut will reveal this under close examination.
This is unique to gypsum and will
not be found in other poured cementitious
products. If sand is included in the mix,
the product is a hybrid of some type and is
referred to as gypsum
concrete. Such material
was used in floor
assemblies in woodframed
construction
and possibly elsewhere;
it will probably
contain sand as well
as Portland cement.
Meanwhile, the term
“poured gypsum” will
be reserved in this
article to describe
roof decks exclusively.
Strength and
physical properties
are also unique.
Gypsum has approximately
500 psi compressive
strength minimum but can range
to 1,200 and beyond (depending on the
mix as described above). This is in contrast
with lightweight insulating concrete (LWIC;
125-250 psi) and structural concrete (2500-
4000 psi and beyond). It can be scratched
with a knife, but cutting or coring requires
saws or drills. A similar distinction can
be drawn by evaluating product density.
Gypsum has 30-55 pcf dry density as
opposed to LWIC (less than 50 pcf by definition—
usually considerably less in practice),
lightweight structural concrete (~110 pcf),
and ordinary structural concrete (150 pcf).
Some older gypsum decks have been found
to be quite hard, sometimes bending or
deforming the driven fasteners commonly
used in base sheet application. Auger-type
fasteners will have to be predrilled, and
O c t o b e r 2 0 1 2 I n t e r f a c e • 7
Figure 1 – Formboards are carried on iron subframing girts called
bulb tees, truss tees, or cold-rolled tees, which are situated across
primary framing supports (image courtesy of Ted Michelsen).
8 • I n t e r f a c e O c t o b e r 2 0 1 2
on-site pull testing should be implemented
when using anything other than ordinary
base sheet fasteners described below. Even
then, pull testing is a worthwhile exercise.
Being plaster of Paris, the material sets
very quickly (~15-18 minutes), liberates
heat while curing (30-40 degrees higher
than ambient), and increases slightly in
volume (~1%).1 Regarding fasteners, poured
gypsum is classified as a nailable deck,
although ordinary roofing nails are appropriate
only for precast gypsum planks,
which will be addressed in a later installment
in this series. Specialty fasteners for
low-slope roofs have been around as long
as gypsum decks have been used. They are
usually in the form of expanding, driven
devices used for securing a base sheet (i.e.,
Simplex and ES Products).
Poured gypsum will almost always have
embedded reinforcing of some type. Welded
wire mesh (Figure 2) is the more common
reinforcement, although agricultural-type
wire resembling chicken wire (Figure 3) has
been used on occasion. LWIC may contain
chicken wire, but it is uncommon and probably
unnecessary. The author has never
encountered welded wire in LWIC or LWIC
placed over the formboards described earlier;
readers who think they have seen such
Figure 2 – Although agricultural-type chicken wire may be found,
welded wire mesh is the more common reinforcement.
Submit original photograph or digital file (300 dpi, 8 x 7.5) to:
Kristen Ammerman, RCI, 1500 Sunday Drive, Suite 204, Raleigh, NC 27607
E-mail: kammerman@rci-online.org • Phone: 800-828-1902
Like to see a picture of your
company’s project gracing
the cover of Interface? Give
your company
industrywide
exposure!
We are looking for attractive, four-color,
high-resolution, vertically oriented shots to
illustrate our monthly themes.
Figure 3 – Agriculturaltype
wire being installed
in a repair region (figure
courtesy of NRDCA).
construction may be seeing
a hybrid configuration and
should check the aggregate
type and strength properties
of poured slurry.
Just as with wood decks,
structural cement fiber, and
LWIC, ply sheets of a bituminous
membrane should not
be hot-mopped to the surface.
Instead, a base sheet
should be fastened according
to wind speed parameters for
the particular area. At that
time, a host of roof systems
can then be configured to
satisfy the project requirements.
Once a base sheet
is installed, the surface is
ready to receive any number
of roof assemblies. The
fastening pattern shown in
Figure 4 is one of several
that can yield desired uplift
resistance. Attachment in the
manner shown will yield 98
fasteners per square; a stag-
O c t o b e r 2 0 1 2 I n t e r f a c e • 9
Figure 4 – The fastening pattern shown will yield 98 fasteners per square; a staggered arrangement can
also be configured if desired.
American Hydrotech’s Garden Roof® Assembly has set the standard by which all other
green roofs are measured. Our Total Assembly Warranty provides owners with single source
responsibility from the deck up. This is peace of mind that only American Hydrotech can offer.
To learn more about the American Hydrotech Garden Roof Assembly, please call 800.877.6125
or visit us online at www.hydrotechusa.com.
The key to our
Garden Roof® is our
Monolithic Membrane
6125®, a seamless
rubberized asphalt
membrane with a 45+
year track record for
critical waterproofing
and roofing applications
world-wide.
From concept to completion
American Hydrotech, Inc. | 303 East Ohio | Chicago, IL 60611 | 800.877.6125 | www.hydrotechusa.com
© 2012 Garden Roof is a registered trademark of American Hydrotech, Inc.
The Soliare – New York, NY
RCI-Solaire-VPL-halfpage.indd 1 2/10/12 12:34 PM
1 0 • I n t e r f a c e O c t o b e r 2 0 1 2
gered arrangement preferred by some product vendors will
yield the equivalent pattern. In zones of high wind speeds, a
slightly denser pattern, together with large-diameter stress
plates, should be incorporated for code compliance.
Prolonged exposure to entrapped water will compromise
all properties of gypsum, including fastener withdrawal resistance.
Trying to get good fasteners into wet gypsum is like
trying to nail gelatin to a wall. Even specialty fasteners will not
yield satisfactory results in a water-compromised deck (Figure
5); beyond this, drying (to the extent such procedure can be
carried out on occupied buildings) will not restore strength
properties of a deck that has been wet for prolonged periods.
Most of the load rating is derived by the spacing and size of
subframing elements. Gypsum roof
decks are a composite system whereby
load-carrying capacity is the sum
of the poured slurry, internal reinforcement,
and some minor contribution
by the formboards. When there
is compromise to these components,
there is corresponding reduction in
loading capacity. Repairs to a gypsum
deck can, of course, be made by
mobilizing for replacement in kind;
however, since that is often costprohibitive
for a small setup or random
spot repairs, site-mixed pourable
grout (Figure 6) is available
through vendors such as Pyrofill by
U.S. Gypsum. The National Roof Deck
Contractors Association (NRDCA)
elaborates on this type of work with
Figure 5 – Fastening into wet
gypsum is like trying to nail gelatin
to a wall. Even specialty fasteners
will not yield satisfactory results in
a water-compromised deck.
Figure 7 – Where found to be nonsalvageable, small regions can be repaired using structural cement fiber planks, provided they are tightly
fitted and nested against the bulb tees.
Figure 6 – For small random repairs, site-mixed pourable
grout is available through vendors such as Pyrofill by U.S.
Gypsum (figure courtesy of NRDCA).
an excellent illustration.2 Where found to
be nonsalvageable, small regions can also
be repaired using structural cement fiber
planks, providing they are tightly nested
against the bulb tees (see Figure 7).
During reroofing, caution should be
exercised with demolition and installation
equipment in modern use. These decks
perform because of the monolithic nature
of the pour, so uniform loading (such as by
snow loads) is usually accommodated. But
concentrated loads by wheeled equipment
and stockpiled materials can damage the
assembly. Figure 8 depicts a gypsum deck
needlessly damaged through reckless rooftop
practices. Since most old built-up roofs
were applied directly over gypsum without
board insulation layers, cutting the felt
plies should proceed with caution, as the
roof-cutter depth must be regulated with
800.255.4255 • www.prosoco.com
Fluid-applied flashing
Use independently or as part of a
building-wide air & water barrier system
Seals rough openings
fast, effectively, and forever
• Window retrofits for existing and historic buildings.
• New construction window installation.
• Can be applied to wet or dry surfaces.
• Repels rain from the instant it goes on.
Air & Waterproof Barrier Systems
RCI Oct. Ad.indd 1 8/30/12 5:31 PM
O c t o b e r 2 0 1 2 I n t e r f a c e • 1 1
Figure 8 – Gypsum deck needlessly damaged through reckless rooftop practices.
Figure 9 – Most old built-up roofs were applied directly over gypsum without a board
insulation layer, so roof-cutter depth must be regulated with caution. (Image courtesy of
Bruce Darling.)
accuracy (Figure 9). Deck construction from
50 years ago anticipated only moderate live
loads such as mop tubs, hot luggers, and
the like. However, modern tear-off equipment,
1,200-lb. rolls of rubber, and grouped
pallets of insulation were not anticipated in
the designs of that time.
Further to the notion of loading, older
gypsum decks sometimes have very little
slope. Even where discernible slope was
provided, there are often dead flat areas
between drains and ponding water. As a
consequence, drainage improvements with
tapered insulation (or crickets at a minimum)
are often necessary, along with
added insulation for energy-code compliance.
These measures, as well as snowdrift
considerations, necessitate review of loading
capacity by a structural engineer.
SUMMARY REMARKS
Poured gypsum is mostly a vintage
form of decking; many are still around, and
those not suffering from deferred maintenance
(Figure 10) may indeed be performing
admirably. Several of the foregoing photos
may appear unflattering, but no attempt
is being made here to portray gypsum as
flawed or prone to performance maladies.
Indeed, the author has direct knowledge
of WWII-era gypsum decks performing well
to this day. Yet, in the course of a consultant’s
works, neglected roof decks are sure
to be encountered, and gypsum is perhaps
less forgiving when plagued with ongoing
leakage, deferred maintenance, overloading,
and the like.
REFERENCES
1. David L. Magnusen, “Gypsum Concrete
Roof Decks,” The Roof Deck (a
series of articles as they appeared in
The Roofing Spec, official publication
of NRCA; handout material from
RIEI, circa 1978), pp 32-37.
2. http://www.nrdca.org/webfiles/
GypsumRepairPictures.pdf.
1 2 • I n t e r f a c e O c t o b e r 2 0 1 2
Lyle Hogan is owner and principal engineer with Fincastle
Engineering, Inc. in Summerfield, NC. He is an ICC structural
masonry inspector, registered engineer in five states, a
Registered Roof Consultant, a fellow of RCI, and a past recipient
of RCI’s Horowitz Award for contributions to Interface
journal.
Lyle D. Hogan, RRC, FRCI, PE
Figure 10 – Gypsum is a mostly vintage form of decking, and many are still around. Those not suffering from deferred maintenance may be
performing admirably.