Skip to main content Skip to footer

Restoration and Maintenance of Architectural Metals

May 15, 2013

Real estate managers and
building owners recognize
that well-maintained buildings
increase tenant satisfaction
and building image.
Buildings are assets, and the
value to the owners and tenants increases
with the use of durable
materials that can be economically
maintained, such as
anodized aluminum, stainless
steel, and coil-coated aluminum.
Architects are fond of
incorporating these architectural
metals into curtain wall
design; and, as a result, they
are commonplace in contemporary
architectural design.
The use of anodized aluminum
and stainless steel in
exterior building design dates
back to the 1960s, when
metal curtain wall designs
became popular with architects
and developers. Some of
the most renowned buildings
in the United States utilize
metal prominently in their curtain
wall, including the John
Hancock building, the Inland
Steel building, and the Willis
Tower (previously Sears Tower)
in Chicago; the Westinghouse
building in Pittsburgh; and the
Equitable building in Atlanta,
to name a few.
Proper maintenance is the
only assurance that the metals
incorporated into these curtain
J u l y 2 0 1 3 I n t e r f a c e • 2 3
This clear anodized
aluminum building in
Grand Rapids, MI, is in the
process of being cleaned.
Close-up of painted
aluminum cleaning
contrast.
2 4 • I n t e r f a c e J u l y 2 0 1 3
walls maintain their intended appearance and luster.
All surfaces exposed to the atmosphere collect
soil, dirt, and atmospheric pollutants, depending
upon the geographic area, environmental conditions,
and location of the building. In extreme
cases, heavy surface oxidation, surface roughening,
and iridescence can develop. The accumulation of
surface soils and atmospheric pollutants increases
the surface roughening, staining, and discoloration
of the finishes. The decorative metallic appearance
of these finishes can only be maintained by
periodic cleaning. If left unmaintained, the oxide
coating of anodized aluminum will be attacked by
these chemical deposits; and in the latter stages
of unmaintained aluminum, corrosion in the form
Restoration is progressing from both corners
of the façade on this anodized
aluminum Century City high-rise.
Demarcation between restored and
unrestored areas of this clear anodized
aluminum building is apparent.
Painted composite panel restoration before.
Painted composite panel restoration after.
of pitting can develop. With respect to stainless steel, these same
contaminants can create corrosion in the form of red rust spots.
It is generally believed by building managers that stainless steel
cannot rust; however, lesser grades of stainless steel will corrode
in the presence of atmospheric pollutants and moisture.
Maintenance should be figured into the life cycle costs or operations
budget of each and every building in which architectural
metals are used in the configuration of the curtain wall. Proper
maintenance, initiated from the beginning, will prevent permanent
damage caused by neglect and ensure maximum life expectancy of
the finish. Material and finish information should be obtained from
the metal supplier or finisher to ensure that the metal is cleaned
properly for a material of its type. Cleaning procedures should
be initiated as soon as practical after construction or installation
to remove construction soil and accumulated environmental pollutants.
Alkaline building materials such as concrete or mortar
should be removed from the architectural metals and glass to prevent
staining, corrosion, or etching of the metal and glass.
In the event that a building façade incorporating architectural
metals is neglected for a period of years, it will be necessary to
employ restorative techniques to return the metal finish to its
intended appearance. In the case of anodized aluminum and
stainless steel, these methods generally require the use of abrasive
materials and procedures to remove heavy soil buildup, oxidation
products, and tenacious pollutants from the neglected metal panels
and extrusions. With the advent and extensive use of Kynar
finishes in the 1980s, a new cleaning challenge was presented to
building managers, owners, consultants, and contractors alike.
Abrasive cleaning methods should not be utilized on coil-coated
J u l y 2 0 1 3 I n t e r f a c e • 2 5
Painted curtain wall
restoration cleaning
in progress on a
Chicago building.
A marked contrast
is apparent after
cleaning of a
stainless steel
building in Denver.
2 6 • I n t e r f a c e J u l y 2 0 1 3
aluminum or painted finishes, due to the likelihood of scratching or
abrading the coating. Extra care must be taken in the cleaning of these
sometimes delicate finishes. The use of strong chemicals or acid-based
cleaners should not be permitted under any circumstance, regardless of
material. These cleaners will very likely permanently damage the finish
of the architectural metals and glass on a curtain wall in the form of
corrosion, discoloration, or etching. Adjacent landscaping will also likely
be damaged due to runoff of these aggressive cleaning solutions.
The American Architectural Manufacturers Association’s (AAMA’s)
609 specification for the cleaning and restoration of architectural metals
outlines basic procedures for the cleaning and maintenance of architectural
metals, with emphasis on anodized and coil-coated aluminum.
Although the AAMA specification provides guidelines for cleaning, the
selection of a contractor with specialized knowledge and experience in
the field of the restoration and maintenance of architectural metals is
imperative to ensure optimal results. The AAMA cleaning specification
in the hands of three or four inexperienced contractors could result in
three or four very different interpretations and results. There are many
documented cases in which the local window cleaner convinced a property
manager that he had the know-how to clean or restore a metal curtain
wall system, only to fail miserably and/or permanently damage the
appearance and finish of the expensive curtain wall materials.
There are numerous cases in which buildings were neglected for
extended periods of time, and restorative cleaning techniques did not
Note contrast before (top) and after (bottom)
restoration of black anodized aluminum.
March 20 – 25, 2014 | Anaheim, California
Anaheim Hilton and Anaheim Convention Center
29th International Convention and Trade Show
RCI, Inc. | rci-online.org/international-convention.html | 800-828-1902
restore the finish to an acceptable level of
appearance. Also, negligent cleaning procedures
implemented by inexperienced contractors
have created these very same situations:
The metal could no longer be restored.
In these cases, the application of fieldapplied
architectural coatings may provide
the desired result. Though this process is
far more costly than restorative cleaning,
it does have advantages in the selection of
virtually any custom color available. When
it is at all possible, the original factory finish
should be retained, as these finishes are far
more durable and lasting than air-dry field
applications of architectural coatings.
No less important, the contractor selected
for this specialized work should have
extensive experience and certifications in
access solutions as they relate to the use of
scaffolding, swing stages, aerial equipment,
and related safety requirements. Every
building is different with respect to roof
suspension systems, tiebacks, roof access,
and overall building design. This experience
is equally as important as the knowledge
that the contractor has in the area of the
cleaning and maintenance of architectural
metals.
Consultants—with the assistance of the
manufacturers, finishers, and fabricators
of these curtain wall systems—should be
able to provide guidance to building owners,
property managers, and contractors
to ensure that these expensive assets are
maintained to safeguard a long, productive
service life.
J u l y 2 0 1 3 I n t e r f a c e • 2 7
Jim Ryan has been engaged in the curtain wall restoration
field for more than 25 years. In 1997, he founded Alumitec
Ltd., of Chicago, IL, and is its president. The company specializes
in the restoration, cleaning, and maintenance of
architectural metals and curtain wall systems. Ryan previously
served as vice president for the Midwest region for AMS
Architectural Technologies for 13 years.
Jim Ryan
The National Roofing Contractors
Association (NRCA) recommends
that designers specify polyisocyanurate
(polyiso) insulation by its
desired thickness, not R-value.
It also maintains that designers
should specify polyiso using an
in-service R-value of 5.0-per-inch
thickness for heating conditions and
a 5.6-per-inch thickness for cooling,
based on the predominant condition
for the building use and climate.
Long-term thermal resistance
(LTTR), which is used by the
Polyisocyanurate Insulation Manufacturers
Association (PIMA) in its
reporting of R-values, may be more
appropriate for laboratory analysis
and research comparisons rather
than for roof system design, the
NRCA opines.
NRCA
Recommends
Polyiso Be Specified
by Thickness,
Not LTTR
The Center for the Polyurethanes Industry (CPI) of the American Chemistry
Council (ACC) has expanded its Regulatory Compliance Assistance Program
(RCAP) by upgrading the interactive tool designed to help manufacturers,
processors, and other users of diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI)
and polymeric MDI (PMDI) in calculating emissions. This tool aids users in
complying with mandatory reporting to the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by estimating emissions from typical process applications and
activities. Users who exceed the threshold limits set by EPA are required to
submit a Form A or Form R to the EPA and the designated state agency by
July 1 each year.
The RCAP can be used by companies in their Toxic Release Inventory (TRI)
reporting. CPI expanded the tool in its “diisocyanates” category to address
12 additional examples of emissions from various applications, including
the manufacture of air filters, appliances, trucks, automobiles, boats, doors,
mobile homes/motor homes, packaging, rebond foam, spray foam, spandex,
and water heaters.
The interactive tool is available free of charge on CPI’s website. To learn
more about this tool and for more information about MDI emissions, visit
http://www.americanchemistry.com/polyurethane.
CPI Expands Emissions
Calculating Tool