Skip to main content Skip to footer

Considerations for Installation of Amenity Spaces on Existing Roofs

September 25, 2021

Having an outdoor rooftop
amenities space is changing
from a luxury to a requirement
for most buildings.
To meet this need, a popular
new trend is arising
in the renovation and restoration of existing
buildings: converting the traditional, unoccupied
roof space into an amenity space for
building occupants to share and enjoy. These
amenities spaces will often include numerous
hardscape and landscape elements, water features,
and/or movable building façade assemblies.
For many building owners, the benefit of
converting a traditional roof space into useable
amenity space increases the overall value of the
property and can attract new occupants.
While this conversion often increases value
and occupancy, it comes with its own set of challenges.
Typically, if the original roof design did
not include accessible tenant space, the redesign
of the in-service assemblies must be evaluated
in a completely new context. Adapting a traditional
roof space into a useable amenity space
requires thoughtful design and consideration
of various aspects of the conversion to ensure a
successful transformation.
While every project is unique, there are several
typical items to consider during the design
phase that will improve the overall success of
renovating a traditional roof area to a modern
rooftop amenity terrace.
STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS
General
A licensed structural engineer should be
consulted to determine whether the existing
structural framing supporting the roof can
accommodate any potential additional loading
requirements introduced during the design of
the new amenity space. Per ASCE 7, Minimum
Design Loads and Associated Criteria for
Buildings and Other Structures, most roofs are
designed for wind, snow, and a minimum roof
live load, typically 12 to 20 lb./ft.2 Amenity
spaces, in addition to the wind and snow loads,
often require a higher roof live load, typically
60 to 100 lb./ft.2 The addition of water features
or water-retention planters will increase the
loads further and could result in the need for
supplemental structural retrofits. These retrofits
can become invasive to tenants and cost
prohibitive if the installation of supplemental
roof framing or modifications to foundations
are deemed necessary.
Anchorage
Components such as railings, screen walls,
posts, and trellises are all popular features for
rooftop amenity spaces. New or modified railings
are often necessitated by the International
Building Code (IBC) to meet safety requirements
for an occupied area. All of these components
must be properly anchored to structural
elements to resist anticipated loading.
For example, the anchorage of a large shade
umbrella to the structural slab would need to be
evaluated for additional wind uplift. As another
example, an existing parapet wall would
need to be evaluated for the additional rotational
force required for the attachment of a
handrail. Anchorage of these components may
require penetrations through the existing roofing
assembly into the structure and necessitate
careful detailing to maintain a watertight roof.
Further consideration of properly detailed penetrations
is discussed below.
Wind
Depending on the height of the roof, the
proximity to other buildings of similar or taller
height, and existing parapet conditions, wind
uplift should be considered when designing
rooftop amenity spaces. Wind uplift will
impact the hardscape and landscape materials
selected for use, particularly at the edges of the
roof (Zones 2 and 3 in ASCE 7) where forces are
greater. Corner zones often require heavier pavers
or paver strapping, greater ballast depths, or
higher parapet walls to resist anticipated wind
loads on hardscape elements. Any accessory
items not anchored to the roof structure (for
example, furniture) that are to be used on the
rooftop amenity space should be selected with
wind considerations in mind.
10 • IIBEC Interface May 2021
WATERPROOFING CONSIDERATIONS
Existing Roof Assembly
A critical and often overlooked component
of any rooftop amenity renovation project
is the roof assembly itself. It is important to
know the type, age, and thickness of the roof
assembly, as well as the location of insulation
or any topping slab or overburden
that may be a part of the in-service
roof. Consideration should be given
to surveying the existing roof assembly
to document the condition of the
roof membrane and base flashings
prior to finalizing the new design.
Non-destructive testing such as
Electronic Leak Detection (ASTM
D7877, Standard Guide for Electronic
Methods for Detecting and Locating
Leaks in Waterproof Membranes)
or Infrared Thermography (ASTM
C1153, Standard Practice for Location
of Wet Insulation in Roofing Systems
Using Infrared Imaging), in combination
with limited destructive openings
to confirm non-destructive testing
results, will help the design team and ownership
determine the necessary roof assembly
repair or replacement scope of work (Figure 1).
If testing and inspection openings confirm
there are deficiencies in the existing roof
membrane, these should be addressed prior to
proceeding with the construction of the new
amenity space, as leaks below the overburden
can be very invasive and costly to repair. In
addition to locating deficiencies, the information
gathered through visual inspection and
non-destructive testing can be used to evaluate
whether the existing assembly is appropriate
for the intended change in use to an occupied/
accessible area, which may include more
pedestrian traffic or overburden than originally
anticipated.
Knowing the type and existing condition
of the roof assembly will allow for an informed
decision on repair strategy and provide insight
on the anticipated performance of the existing
assembly within the new design. Review of the
in-service roof will help guide the decision of
whether a full roof replacement is warranted
or whether isolated, discreet repairs are sufficient.
The age and exposure of the existing
roofing assembly should be considered when
contemplating a full roof replacement prior to
installation of a rooftop amenity space.
Drains and Drainage
The existing roof should be surveyed to
determine if there are any areas of ponding or
insufficient drainage (Figure 2). In addition to
the increase in structural loading that results
from ponding water, depending on the roof
system (that is, whether it is a low-slope, singleply
membrane such as modified bitumen, TPO,
PVC, EPDM, or KEE), ponding water can void
the manufacturer’s warranty. Ponding water
can magnify ultraviolet rays which may accelerate
deterioration of the roof system; it can
Figure 1. Core cuts or larger destructive openings into the existing roof assembly can be used
to confirm components and condition of the in-service roof system as well as results of nondestructive
testing. This information will help the design team and owners define necessary
repair or replacement scope criteria early on in a project.
Figure 2. The functionality of
roof drains and overflow drains
should be reviewed during the
design phase to ensure adequate
drainage and limit ponding.
May 2021 IIBEC Interface • 11
also collect debris and contaminants, promote algae growth, create
areas of ice, and potentially support mosquito breeding.
Moreover, the functionality of all primary roof drains and
overflow drains, as well as slope to drain in proposed amenity spaces,
should be reviewed and confirmed during the design phase. All
roof overburden—inclusive of new support structures and curbs
for decks, railings, and the like—should be designed to not impede
or otherwise block drainage. Applicable code provisions regarding
primary and overflow drainage requirements should be reviewed
during the design phase.
Drain assemblies should be regularly cleaned and remain
readily accessible during their service life to reduce the potential
for ponding water. Indicating the location of drains at the surface of
new overburden (with a mark on pavers, an inspection chamber in
planters, and the like) is helpful to building engineering staff who
must locate and maintain roof drains. Depending on the existing
roofing assembly and proposed overburden, consideration should
be given to the use of a two-stage drain assembly, with appropriate grates,
screens, or strainers, to facilitate drainage at the levels of the existing roofing
membrane and new overburden as well as to reduce blockage by debris.
Another important drainage consideration that is often left to field coordination
is the elevation of door thresholds with respect to scuppers and overflow
drains. It is critical that overflow drainage elevations are set below the level of
all thresholds to prevent water that backs up on the roof from undermining
doors before evacuating the roof. To that end, it is critical that slope to drain,
drain strainers, scuppers, and overflow drains remain unobstructed by new
hardscape and landscape elements to promote roof drainage.
Expansion Joints
Depending on the structure, an existing expansion joint assembly may
need to be integrated into the design of the new amenity space. Expansion joints
are engineered assemblies that accommodate building movements generated
by forces due to thermal cycling, wind, seismic events, or live-load deflections.
The design team should consider the potential for surface-level movement of
overburden elements located above the expansion joint to avoid such things
as heaving of pavers or cracking of topping slabs. Prior to covering an existing
expansion joint, similar to the existing roof membrane, the joint should be
12 • IIBEC Interface May 2021
Figure 3. Existing mechanical equipment must often be relocated
to make room for new amenities at existing rooftop spaces.
Screen walls and planters can be used to hide or restrict access to
mechanical areas. Fireplaces and other utilities will require new
penetrations through the roof assembly.
Figure 4. Consideration should be given to existing
parapet heights and code requirements for
guardrails. Existing parapets or guardrails may
require modification to meet code requirements.
Figure 5. Inswing doors are often required at rooftop amenity spaces to
meet code requirements for emergency egress. Inswing doors can pose
challenges for maintaining the integrity of the building enclosure.
surveyed to ensure it is watertight; if the existing
roof assembly is replaced, any expansion
joints integrated into the roof should also be
replaced. The expansion joint should be protected
from damage both during construction
of the amenity space and once completed and
exposed to pedestrian traffic.
Penetrations and MEP Equipment
Roofs commonly include vents, fans,
HVAC equipment, solar panels, and other
mechanical equipment. Consideration should
be given to designing around or relocating this
equipment as part of the amenity space design
phase (Figure 3). Screen walls, landscape elements,
or security gates may be used to limit
access to rooftop equipment or other areas
where pedestrian access should be limited.
Additionally, many designers will include new
features such as gas grills, firepits, or water elements
that will require the installation of new
utility lines through the existing roof assembly.
Review of the existing roof membrane and
any applicable warranty requirements should
be considered to ensure that installation of the
penetrations and new flashing membranes are
performed by a certified installer to avoid water
leakage and voiding of existing warranties.
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS
Railings and Screen Walls
To maintain occupant safety and protect
against fall hazards, rooftop amenity spaces
may require the addition of railings at their
perimeter; full-height glass screen walls may
be warranted in areas with high winds to provide
comfort to rooftop occupants. While some
roofs have existing parapets that meet railing
height requirements, other roofs only have low
perimeter curbs and will require new railings to
meet minimum code requirements (Figure 4).
The height of the existing parapet may
meet the height requirements for guardrails
(42 in. per IBC Chapter 10, Section 1015.3), but
if pavers and pedestals are added to the roof,
the parapet height may need to increase, or a
handrail may need to be mounted to the top
of the existing parapet to meet code requirements.
The height of the railing should be
measured from the top surface of the finished
flooring. Building height restrictions and setback
requirements should be considered in the
location of new railings or screen walls.
Access and Egress
It is not uncommon for traditional roofs
to be accessed via a service stairwell or freight
elevator. There are also many existing roofs
that are not readily accessible, perhaps limiting
access to an operable window. Most new amenity
spaces must be Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) compliant, which may require
reconfiguring of elevator lobbies or the installation
of a ramp. In addition, per IBC Chapter
10, Section 1010.1.2.1, rooftop amenity spaces
will require exit doors in the direction of egress
travel, resulting in the need for inswing doors at
these locations. This often proves challenging
in maintaining the integrity of the building
enclosure (Figure 5). Depending on anticipated
occupant load of the roof, multiple means of
egress may be required by code.
New access doors should be properly
detailed into the existing building enclosure
to promote a water-resistant design. Inswing
doors are prone to water leakage as the positive
pressure from wind gusts during storms reduces
the compression of their perimeter gasketing
allowing excess water around the operable door
panel. Consideration should be given to including
diverters at the head of doors, sweeper gaskets
face-mounted to the bottom of the doors,
robust perimeter gaskets/weather-stripping,
and fully sealed door thresholds as strategies for
improving the performance of inswing doors.
Quickly and easily
detect air and
water leaks in air
barriers and roof
membranes.
Leak Tester
Conforms to
ASTM E1186
1-800-448-3835
www.defelsko.com
DeFelsko Corporation l Ogdensburg, New York USA
Tel: +1-315-393-4450 l Email: techsale@defelsko.com
n Single and two-ply membranes
n Liquid applied membranes and paint
n Air barriers
n EPDM roofing systems
n Waterproofing and more
May 2021 IIBEC Interface • 13
Additionally, limiting the use of hollow metal
doors and using more robust terrace doors that
have a water-resistance rating per the American
Architectural Manufacturers Association can
improve the overall performance with respect
to water leakage.
AESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS
Specialty Doors
There are several specialty doors on the
market that allow for large portions of the
building wall to be opened to the exterior
rooftop amenity space (such as garage-style
overhead doors or folding glass walls). Much
like in-swing doors for egress, if not carefully
detailed, these are often susceptible to water
and air leakage. Consideration should be given
to installation of a trench drain, either immediately
outboard of these assemblies to reduce
water sheeting over the walking surface from
accessing the flat thresholds, or inboard of
these door systems to manage water that may
bypass the minimal weather-stripping that
often accompanies this style of movable façade.
Additionally, the use of moisture-tolerant flooring
can prevent water damage to interior finishes
when water leakage occurs.
Planters
Planters are popular features for rooftop
amenity spaces. Planters can be built in and
integrated with the roofing assembly, or independent
and placed on the surface of the roof.
As noted previously, consideration should be
given to the additional loading of the planters
and evaluated by a licensed structural engineer.
The location of integral planters, as well
as the drainage within and around the planters
should be considered to ensure the planters
do not block scuppers or prevent drain
14 • IIBEC Interface May 2021
IIBEC Region Meetings
July 20-22, 2021 June 22 & 24, 2021
Region V Virtual
Meeting
Region II Virtual
Meeting
Save the
Dates
Attendee Registration Fees:
Member – $175
Nonmember – $225
Exceptional Content | Virtual Format
Figure 6. Pavers come in all shapes, sizes, and materials, and they are a common choice for use
as walking surfaces at rooftop amenity spaces.
maintenance. The types of plantings intended
for use, along with any required liners/
root barriers, should also be considered and
incorporated into the design to avoid damage
to the roof assembly from invasive root systems.
Consideration should also be given to the
amount of work required to remove the planter
to facilitate roof replacement or repairs when
needed.
Turf
Artificial turf has become more advanced
and more natural in its overall appearance. As
such, designers are incorporating it more frequently
into their designs of rooftop amenities.
Many artificial turf manufacturers have
requirements specific to their products.
Generally, items to consider when designing
and installing an artificial turf assembly include
but are not limited to attachment of the turf
to the roof, and drainage beneath the turf.
Improper attachment can result in wrinkling
of the turf assembly or inhibit drainage of large
areas of the roof.
Drainage is a particularly important consideration
if the turf assembly is intended for
use as a pet relief area. If proprietary pet relief
roofing systems are not included in the design,
consideration should be given to the development
of an appropriate care and maintenance
plan that may include frequent inspections
to review the condition of the roofing/waterproofing
membranes as well as adjacent elements
such as railing posts and thresholds. part
of the plan may require regular rinsing with
water to maintain a sanitary space and reduce
odors. The roofing manufacturer should also
be consulted about effects of pet waste on the
roofing assembly and existing warranties.
Pavers
Pavers come in all shapes, sizes, and materials,
such as standard concrete pavers, porcelain
tiles, stone, and wood. Given the seemingly
unlimited options, they are certainly the most
common walking surface for rooftop amenity
spaces (Figure 6).
Pavers are typically positioned above the
roof assembly on shims or pedestals of varying
heights. It is not recommended that the roofing
assembly be directly walked upon, or that pavers
be positioned on top of the roof assembly without
a protection layer, as this will increase the risk
for puncture and other damage.
Finishes and Amenity Structures
Rooftop amenity spaces often include new
interior conditioned spaces such as vestibules,
lobbies, or shared common space for tenants
(Figures 7 and 8). Exterior elements, such as
permanent canopies or sunshades and trellises
or pergolas, can all enhance the outdoor space
at the roof. These features all require integration
with the existing primary building enclosure,
whether that is the roofing membrane
or the air and moisture barrier of an existing
penthouse structure. Interface details should be
considered to maintain a continuous air, water,
and thermal plane with the addition of the new
features.
SUMMARY
As can be seen in the list of items in this
article, there is a lot to consider prior to starting
any rooftop-amenity design project. The first
step should be to complete a thorough evaluation
and condition assessment of the existing roof
assembly, inclusive of non-destructive testing and
May 2021 IIBEC Interface • 15
Figure 7. New interior conditioned
spaces must be properly integrated
into the existing primary building
enclosure.
Figure 8. Interface details
at new fenestration or
exterior elements should
be considered to maintain
a continuous air, water,
and thermal plane with the
addition of the new features.
inspection openings to limit unforeseen conditions
and design changes during construction.
Detailed drawings should be produced by
a design professional, in the context of the
owner’s performance requirements and overall
project limitations. Engage design consultants
to assist with project-specific requirements
addressing structural modifications, waterproofing
challenges, safety, and design of specialty
assemblies.
REFERENCES
• ASCE/SEI 7-16. Minimum Design
Loads and Associated Criteria for
Buildings and Other Structures.
American Society of Civil Engineers.
Reston, VA. 2016. www.asce.org.
• International Building Code (IBC) 2018.
International Code Council. Country
Club Hills, IL. 2017. www.iccsafe.org.
• ASTM D7877-14, Standard Guide
for Electronic Methods for Detecting
and Locating Leaks in Waterproof
Membranes. ASTM International. West
Conshohocken, PA. 2014. www.astm.org.
• ASTM C1153-10 (2015), Standard
Practice for Location of Wet Insulation
in Roofing Systems Using Infrared
Imaging. ASTM International. West
Conshohocken, PA. 2015. www.astm.org.
70 107
Sq. Air C
M
Y
CM
MY
CY
CMY
K
Emmett Horton,
EIT, is an associate
II at WJE in
Washington, DC.
In his time at WJE,
Horton has gained
experience on a
broad range of projects
related to façade
failure investigations,
construction observation,
field quality
assurance, condition
surveys, and evaluations of new and existing
structures.
Emmett Horton, EIT
Suzanne Thorpe,
PE, is an associate
principal at WJE in
Washington, DC.
Thorpe provides
building enclosure
consulting services
with a focus on new
construction and
renovation of existing
structures. She
has performed building
enclosure design
reviews, submittal reviews, preconstruction mockup
performance testing, and construction observation
services on new and historically significant
properties throughout the Washington, DC,
region and beyond.
Suzanne Thorpe, PE
Kelly Cronin, PE, is
a senior associate at
Wiss, Janney, Elstner
Associates, Inc. (WJE)
in Washington, DC.
She is the past president
of the National
Capital Section of the
American Society of
Civil Engineers. In her
time at WJE, Cronin
has gained extensive
experience on a broad
range of projects performing field investigations and
repair design to address bulk rainwater penetration,
condensation, and moisture-related deterioration of
above- and below-grade building enclosure materials,
components, and systems.
Kelly Cronin, PE
16 • IIBEC Interface May 2021
For the past few years, the National Roofing Contractors Association
(NRCA) has organized an annual Roofing Day in DC, and IIBEC has
supported and participated in these efforts. Like many events since the
pandemic began, this year’s event was virtual, and took place on March 23
and 24. Over 300 participants met with their senators and representatives
and staff (via Zoom) to discuss federal policies and how they impact roofers.
Topics included:
• Increased funding for career and technical education to address
workforce shortages;
• A strong buildings component in federal infrastructure legislation—
the E-QUIP Act—which would provide an
accelerated tax depreciation for upgraded roofs; and
• Immigration reform that meets the roofing industry’s
workforce needs.
IIBEC’s Second Vice President Amy Peevey, Immediate
Past President Scott Hinesley, Past President and Advocacy
Committee Chair Thomas M. Gernetzke, Industry Liaison
Committee Chair Janial Mack, EVP/CEO Brian Pallasch,
and Director of Government Relations John Boling joined
industry colleagues to meet with members of Congress and
their staff to build relationships and discuss how the roofing
industry is affected by federal policies.
Senator Thom Tillis’s
(R-NC) legislative
correspondents Cirilo
Perez (on the phone)
and Sam Lupas (bottom
center) spoke with Dustin
and Piper Gilman (top
left), Scott Hinesley (top
middle), Brian Pallasch
(top right), and John
Boling (bottom left).
Representative Madison Cawthorn’s (R-NC-11)
legislative assistant Keifer Wynn (bottom) spoke
with Dustin and Piper Gilman (top left) and
Scott Hinesley (top right).
IIBEC Participates in Roofing Day 2021