Skip to main content Skip to footer

Maintenance Software Review: The Art of Roofing Condition Inspections

March 11, 1998

Maintenance Software Review: The Art of Roofing Condition Inspections

 

By Dana J. Vanier, Hitesh Doshi, Brian R. Kyle, Robert W. Marcellus
INTRODUCTION
HE BUILDING ENVELOPE
Life Cycle Asset Management
project (BELCAM) is a multi¬
year research activity spon¬
sored by the National Research
Council Canada iNRCCi and Public
Works and Government Services
Canada d’WGSO The BELCAM
project investigates life cycle asset
management of the building envelope,
but in this first phase of the project it
is concentrating on roofing systems as
a ‘proof ol concept” domain The
BELCAM objectives are to assist asset
managers in optimizing life cycle
maintenance expenditures and to help
them predict the remaining service
life of roofing svstems.
One of the deliverables of the BELCAM
Project (www.nrc.ca/irc/belcam)
is the evaluation of existing software
used in roofing maintenance manage¬
ment and service life prediction. This
is the first of many software evalua¬
tion reports. Subsequent versions will
follow as more software programs are
made available and as the existing
packages are enhanced. This paper
focuses on four roof inspection pack¬
ages available in North America and
identifies their features and capabili¬
ties for approximately 50 pre-selected
categories and criteria. It also provides
background information on seven
other roofing programs This report
does not rate or rank the four pack¬
ages presented herein, but provides
building owners, roofing contractors
and roofing consultants with an objec¬
tive review of systems currently avail¬
able The information herein is pro¬
vided to assist users to locate software
tools for decisions about roofing
maintenance, to provide data about
the general nature of the available
software, and to help building owners,
contractors and consultants make
decisions about automating data col¬
lection, monitoring and retrieval.
NRCC and PWGSC have consider¬
able experience with the use of soft¬
ware tools, as well as the formal evalu¬
ation of software products (Vanier,
1985). Unfortunately, there have
been few evaluations or comparisons
of software in the construction indus¬
try (Amistadi, 1995) and only one or
two review’s in the roofing industry
(Novitski, 1992). It is hoped that this
report will encourage others to use
software tools in the industry and will
act as a catalyst for others to report
their finding about capabilities, fea¬
tures and problems with roofing main¬
tenance management software.
Parameters of the review
A wide variety of software has been developed for the roof¬
ing industry. This includes software tools for design, estimat¬
ing, repair, sales support, evaluation and service life predic¬
tion It could also include any preventative maintenance,
maintenance management or financial information manage¬
ment system that claims to have something to do with roof¬
ing, roofing activities, roofing supplies or roofing systems
This type of software is beyond the scope of this report
This report focuses only on packages dealing with roofing
evaluation and service life prediction. Complete evaluations
of four commercially available software packages are includ¬
ed, however, background data have been provided to identify
points of contacts and general information about proprietary
roofing inspection systems and well-known applications in
other roofing domains, such as estimating and design.
Limitations of the review
The report is the first of a series dealing with the evalua¬
tion of roofing inspection software. It is not a comprehen¬
sive evaluation of ALL the technical and interface features of
ALL available software packages, either commercial products
or proprietary services. It is an overview of a number of
commercial software packages that are well known to the
industry, and that are currently available and supported. The
report identifies only specific features and capabilities relat¬
ed to asset management and service life prediction, but does
not rate or rank these products or their capabilities.
10 • Interface March 1998
I BAUI ROAD WA
2 BAYVIEW CERT
3 BIRD’S CREEK
4 PLACE VERDUR
5 RE ADVEIL PU
350.00
650.00
1S00.00
0.00
1500,00
3925.00
3150.00
9150.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
39600.00
0.00
10000.00
0.00
4275.00
43400.00
10650.00
16000.00
1500.00
552.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Grand Total » 4000.00 16225.00 57600.00 77825.00 552.32
Sample Screen Captures from CAMP
The Review Process
Software Selection
Selection of the software was made by the authors based
on their extensive experience in the roofing industry, from
information obtained from knowledgeable contacts in indus¬
try, and from data acquired from extensive searching of the
Internet and other electronic databases. It was quickly dis¬
covered that there is precious little information available
about roofing inspection software, and that the most reliable
information came from knowledgeable individuals.
Only commercially-available software was evaluated in this
report, owing to time, personnel and administrative con¬
straints. It is hoped that some proprietary systems men¬
tioned in this report can be evaluated in subsequent reports.
Four products were selected for a complete evaluation in
this report:
▼ CAMP – Roofing Management program from CAMP.
Inc.
▼ REVS – from Roofing EValuation System by Bruco
Enterprises, Inc.
▼ ROOFER – from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Civil
Engineering Research Laboratories
▼ ROOFWORKS – from Jim D. Koontz & Associates, Inc.
Software Features and Capabilities
All the software products evaluated in this report were
obtained directly from the developer and represent the most
current version of the software. The installations were car¬
ried out following the developers’ instructions, and the fea¬
tures and capabilities were reviewed based on the software
provided, the instructions from the developers, and the user
manuals provided by the developer.
It must be emphatically noted that this review was initiat¬
ed and designed to meet the goals of the BELCAM project,-
therefore, the evaluation, or even identification, of “interest¬
ing” features of specific products is omitted because these are
outside the scope of this review.
Reviewer Selection
The reviewers (a.k.a. authors) are experienced construction
engineers with considerable experience in the roofing indus¬
try. The reviewers all have extensive experience with soft¬
ware tools and considerable “hands-on” experience with at
least one of the roofing packages evaluated in this report.
As one goal of this review is to enumerate the features and
capabilities of a limited number of software products, no
attempt was made in this process to represent users from any
specific sector of the industry, level of experience, or classi¬
fication of profession. In fact, the reviewers are all multi-dis¬
ciplinarians,- they have a collection of degrees in architec¬
ture, building engineering, or civil engineering,- they are
practicing as either researchers, educators, asset managers or
roofing consultants, and all have been up on a roof to per¬
form a roofing inspection.
March 1998 Interface • 11
B Raimgt by Spate* and Aga |A> Piofects) Q !
Aga ef Roof (Y«an)
***»•* SO 37 ?0 4» 3/
Vahits shown »• Roof CoattiM Iratos faMp
1 Roof System | 0-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21* Awrage
ae to TO — 53
MaMi 100 4M TO
-•* 45
PaiywalMn* 29 2S
SMfiaPly 50 90
Sample Screen Captures from RoofWorks
Background Software Information
Evaluated Software
Roof EValuation System (REVS)
Contact: C. Bruce Cotton, Bruco Enterprises Inc. (491659),
P.O. Box 2556, Spring, TX 77383-2556
Tel: (281) 353-9541 Fax: (281) 353-3845
E-mail: baico@flash.net Web Site: www.flash.net/-bruco
CAMP — Roof Management Program
Contact: Michael Reynolds, Computer Assisted
Management Programs, Inc., 36 Elynhill Drive, North York,
ON, M2R1C6
Tel/Fax: (416) 222-6105
ROOFER
Developed by: U.S. Army Construction Engineering,
Research Laboratories, CECER-FL-M, P.O. Box 9005,
Champaign, IL 61826-9005
Supported by: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
Technical Support Center
Contact: Lynn Brownfield, ROOFER Technical Support
Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 302 E.
John Street, Suite 202, Champaign, IL 61820
Tel: (217) 333-2882 Fax: (217) 333-9561
E-mail: padilla@ux 1 cso.uiuc.edu
Web site: www.conted.ceps.uiuc.edu/support_center
RoofWorks
Contact: Jim D. Koontz, Jim D. Koontz & Associates, Inc.,
P.O. Box 1054, Hobbs, NM 88240
Tel: (505) 392-7676 Fax: (505) 392-7602
E-mail: in process of changing, please check web site
Web Site: http://www.jdkoontz.com
Software NOT evaluated
In the authors’ quest for locating available software in the
roofing domain, it was quickly discovered that good infor¬
mation about roofing software is hard to find and these leads
are difficult to track down. In some cases, for example, off¬
shore products were tracked down but were found to be
design or estimating applications. In order to save others
from having to duplicate our investigative work, the authors
provide background data about products or services that are
currently available but do not fall into the scope of the eval¬
uation.
If others are aware of additional roofing inspection prod¬
ucts or services, they are asked to contact Dana Vanier by email
at dana.vanier@nrc.ca or by telephone at (613) 993-
9699 (Fax 954-5984).
The following software tools were not evaluated in this
report owing to time restraints, because of the proprietary
nature of the product, or because the software was outside of
the established scope of the report. The information provid¬
ed herein was received from the developers, web pages or
printed literature. In the case of TRIM, a full evaluation was
12 • Interface March 1998
Section ID |R*
Section Name |
Occupancy [COLD STORAGE . “”
Roof Arna [6523 | Inuanloiy Dale 103Z01ZT3S5~] Dale Constructed |01Z01Z1S8B | Dale Lail Replaced | z Z j
Data: OCTD1/1997 RCI Report FW 1
tnitaltitlon: M9M- Fort XXX
Butidlng ©/Name
Category
6k ©/Slape/Membrane
Insulation Type{t)
Deck Type
Sect
Area
(SqF()
Lett
Cone
Year
Last
bsp
Year
MCNFCMC1 RCI
71 18 COLD STORAGE
FACLITY
Supply FicMi’i
C 14 BUR Alphih
WOOD FIBERBOARD
CONCRETE STD CMLfc-PlKt
A 1/4 BUR; AiphH
NONE
W000 BOARDS
8 14 BUR AipMN
NONE
CONCRETE STD Cmh^iKe
7861
K23
7979
1968
1941
1952
1992
1992
9640100
9543^-
96/91A—
71
87
92
TotUe
10 Year Program for Built-Up t. Single- Pty Roots
(Costs in Thousands)
Ifnoaoloe FmMM
•<Mnp> I tactern j Tefal Ana EX)
_ u» mi uss toes twi toet tm »m tees tact Total.
ImaeAM* HepMt
Mtp RetM Projects II 11 II 11 «
Ro*I«cmmm«1 hejecti |41 134 (?)
WtHttAMe MIR |1 |1 (1 (I |t (t |i |t |i 0
trnviatien UcMctkm
VnMi Inpecamra H 11 U fl V (1 fl fl fl fl VO
Teiah H) M M U V U P t? IV U tW
| b* || ~| | c~i ~| I B* I
Sample Screen Captures from ROOFER
attempted, but the results are not presented owing to the
proprietary nature of the software and the fact that only a
demonstration version, and not a fully-operational applica¬
tion, was provided. It is hoped that in the publication of
subsequent reports that a few of these software packages can
be included in the evaluation.
Proprietary Systems
Bradford Management System
Contact: Dane Bradford, Bradford Roofing Management,
P.O. Box 20502, Billings, MT 59104
Tel: (406) 252-2278
Application: Proprietary software used for roofing manage¬
ment. The developer provides copies of the software to its
roofing clients in order for them to maintain the data on
their own roofs. Bradford’s clients include many large indus¬
trial and governmental agencies.
Facefacts (RAMP)
Contact: J. J. (Jim) Watson, Building Technology Associates,
Inc., 21850 Greenfield Road, Oak Park, MI, 48237
Tel: (810) 967-4630 Fax: (810) 967-4640
Application: Economic evaluations of roof service life. The
developer provides copies of the software to their roofing
clients for them to maintain the data on their own roofs.
Also does asset management for other applications. Facefacts
is used by Building Technology Associates, Inc. to inspect
roofs of industrial and governmental clients and to assist
them in evaluating the service life of roofing systems, based
on sophisticated economic and technical models.
ROOFA – ROOFing Alberta Management System, Alberta
Public Works
Contact: Barrie Dennis, Alberta Public Works, 3rd Floor,
6950 100th Street, Edmonton, AB T6H 5V7
Tel: (403) 422-7420 Fax: (403) 422-7479
E-mail: barrie.dennis@gov.ab.ca
Application: This is a DOS application written by Alberta
Public Works (APW) that is based on the original ROOFER
package from the Construction Engineering Research
Laboratories. It is supported and updated by APW.
RoofMAP
Contact: Paul Mitchell, PSI, 6200 SOM Center Road, Suite
C23, Solon, OH 44139
Tel: (440) 498-1234 Fax: 440 498-1236
E-mail: pmmitchell@compuserve.com
Web site: http://www.psiusa.com/services/randp.htm
Application: Proprietary software used for roofing manage¬
ment. The developer provides copies of the software to its
roofing clients for them to maintain the data on their own
roofs. Company is currently replacing the original DOS
software with a completely redesigned Windows version.
TRIM
Contact: Joseph (Joe) H Dandele, Tremco, Roofing
Division, 140 Graden Street, Gananoque, ON K7G 1H9
March 1998 Interface • 13
Sample Screen Captures from REVS
Tel: (613) 769-3285 Fax: (613) 382-8357
Application: TRIM is a portfolio management tool provided
by Tremco to do roofing inspection. The software received
by the reviewers is a demonstration copy which does not
allow the user to add or modify data TRIM is provided by
Tremco as part of contracted inspection services (mem¬
brane, insulation, flashing, etc ). TRIM runs on FoxPRO
under Windows 3. 1, and has an interesting feature that com¬
bines a glossary of roofing and defect terms with graphics.
Other Roofing Systems
PROS, Personalized Roofing Operations System
Contact: Gregg Steinbrenner, Texstar Computer Systems,
Illi South Main Street, Suite A, Duncanville, TX 75137
Tel: (972) 298-9596 Fax: (972) 298-6166
Web Site: www.roofingnet.com/PROS.HTML
Application: PROS is positioned as a sales support tool for
roofing contractors and roofing product sales staff. It is also
a roofing replacement estimating and quantity take-off pack¬
age. PROS also handles written estimates, work orders, pur¬
chase orders, accounts receivable, and has a report genera¬
tor. It runs on DOS, Win95 and WinNT.
RoofMaster
Contact: Rowan Morgan, Rowan Morgan Computer, New
Zealand
Tel: 64 (09) 268 2326
E-mail: rcl@ihug.co.nz
Application: Estimating software, along with Buildmaster,
which has been selling for about 12 years. It is also a quanti¬
ty calculation program. A residential quantity survey done
manually would take most estimators about 3 to 4 hours,
with Buildmaster software it should take only 30 to 40 min¬
utes and that includes the full pricing along with quantities.
It is currently available as a DOS product but the developers
hope to have a Windows version soon.
14 • Interface March 1998
Features and Capabilities of Selected Commercial Products
VERSION Roof Management
Program
REVS System 2000 MicroRoofer RoofWorks 2nd
Edition
Tested Version 3.09c Version 7.0 Version 1.3 Version 2.02
USERS
Inspection ♦ * * ♦
Maintenance * * * «
Other Evaluation Evaluation Estimating, Costs
HARDWARE MIN. (tested)
RAM 400 KB (486) 8 Mb (40Mb) 8 Mb (32) 16 Mb (40)
Platform IBM PC and up (486) 386+ (Pentium) 386DX-33Mhz (P200MMX) 486+ (Pentium)
Operating system DOS or DOS box (DOS) 95, NT 16/32 (95) 3.1, NT, 95 (95) Win 3.1. 95 (95)
Monitor 640×480 (VGA req’d for display
of roof plans)
640×480 or 800×600
(800×600)
640×480 (800×600)
Color 256 colors 256 colors 256 colors
Mouse Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory
Disk supplied 1 Floppy 5 Hoppies for base program (CD
ROM in near future)
2 Floppies 6 Floppies
Disk space (application-data) 1 Mb to 5 Mb 5 MB – 15 Mb 10 Mb 16 Mb – image-dependent
Other Scanner
SOFTWARE
Type of software shell Flat file Relational database shell Relational database shell Relational database shell
Shell (if applicable) Paradox 7 Runtime Access l.X Paradox 4.5 Runtime
Software interface
(Graphical User Interface)
DOS Menus GUI GUI GUI
Architecture (Client/server,
mobile units)
Networkable, multi-user, records
in use locked (not tested)
Networkable, multi-user, records
in use locked (not tested)
Networkable, mobile edition
available separately
Networkable, multi-user, only
one user al a time (not tested)
Installation Disk copying with installer Disk copying with installer Disk copying with installer Disk copying with installer
Future Enhancements Will be migrating to Windows Program will be developed using
Borland Delphi as stand-alone
executable
V3.0 in Apr. ’98, more reports,
searching, NT
Other Pen-based mobile
PRICE Approx. $1000 CDN $500+ U.S. for base unit, $800
for full version
$375 U.S. $500 U.S.
custom programming
TECHNICAL FEATURES
Organizational structure Client has divisions, buildings,
roofs
Client has site, buildings, roofs,
equipment, components
Multi-facility with many roof
areas/facility
Client has properties, building,
roofs
Max. # of sections/bldgs. 999 Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited
Creating components Add, Modify. Delete Add, Modify. Delete Add, Modify, Delete Add, Modify, Delete
Tracks roof leaks Repairs are linked to all roofs
and components
• * with charts
Maint. /repair tracking ■ * Limited «
Costing • Repair Input costs & tracking * * * with future projections
Costing – Maintenance Input costs & tracking « • * financial analysis
ADDITIONAL FEATURES
Budgeting 5-year period « • *
Library of components * * Defaults and Categories «
Charts • * for most reports
Roofing Condition Index
(RCD
Ratings 1-7 for membrane &
insulation form the RCI in
conjunction with user input of
age and design life
Elaborate – based on years of
empirical data. RCl based on
deduct values and related to age
and service life
RCI is based on user assigned 0-
100. A subjective rating can also
be entered; also red. yellow,
green coding or remaining life
Condition assessment
surveys
For all roof components,
flashings, membrane, insulation,
parapets, etc.
There are Hashing, membrane,
insulation condition indexes
General roofing data can be
entered
Other Unlimited amount of detail can
be provided
Pictures, warranty information Data on manufacturer,
consultant, contractor, etc.
16 • Interface March 1998
Features and Capabilities of Selected Commercial Products (cont.)
VERSION Roof Management Program REVS System 2000 MicroRoofer RoofWorks 2nd Edition
LINKS TO OTHER
APPLICATIONS
Stand-alone Stand-alone Stand-alone Stand-alone
Financial information Internal budgeting Internal budgeting Internal Internal – projections
Preventative maintenance Internal Internal Internal
Maintenance management Internal Internal Limited Internal Internal
Work orders Internal Limited Internal Reports
Geographical Information
Systems (GIS)
Prototypes have been developed
Photos * •
CADD import Import of Autocad files for
display only (not tested)
Slick! (AutoCad reader).dwg, .gif
or any scanned image
Can draw sketches Roof drawings are integral to
data entry. Photos tied to
drawing location. AutoCAD,
scanned images possible
CADD export Redline printing Printing, faxing
Other Roof plans – PCX format
EXPORT FEATURES Custom work Export io mobile Roofer Custom work
Tab delimited Paradox export * Paradox export
Other formats Paradox export Paradox export
SECURITY
Passwords * * a
Backup Detailed instructions
Other • Data export to spreadsheets
REPORTS (Not available for evaluation)
Internal format Printouts of screen output forms
& reports
Printout of forms and reports Printouts of screen output forms
and reports
Data output in tab del. form Standard & ad-hoc formats Paradox engine Paradox engine
Other On-the-fly user comments may be
added
Roofing warranty can be
scanned for reports
HELP (On-line, off-line,
balloon help, manuals)
Manual – 43 pages, includes
screen captures
Manual • 50 pages, includes
screen captures
4 manual Manual- 120 pages, includes
screen captures
Contents * On-line for Paradox On-line for RoofWorks
How to use help rudimentary For Paradox •
Context-sensitive help For Paradox For RoofWorks
Other Phone support Phone support & training
through RjEI, UIUC. Price
includes 1 yr. support. Renewal
of sub. is 5300 US & includes
all upgrades
1-800 service, one hour free for
subscribers
NOTES (restrictions) Only U S. stales
No extensions, yet Recording a roof replacement.
ROOFER deletes historical data
12 numeric characters for
phones, etc.
Imperial or SI (no conversion) Only Imperial Units Only Imperia] Units Only Imperial Units
Software Evaluation
The sample “screen captures” shown herein were selected
by the authors to represent the software and demonstrate
the graphical and technical capabilities of the product. They
should be examined for content and presentation style, as
they provide additional insight into the software capabilities.
The tables on pages 16 and 17 detail the features and
capabilities of commercial products. These criteria were
established prior to the evaluation process and were only
slightly modified during the evaluation process. Whenever
possible, explanations are provided by the reviewers. An
asterisk (*) in the table indicates that the software provides
this functionality. Because some of the review categories are
quite general, it may be difficult for the reader to determine
the meaning of an asterisk in ‘Tracks Roof Leaks,” for exam¬
ple. To the reviewers it means that the software has some
way of recording when and where leaks occurred; the aster¬
isk does not indicate that the product did it effectively or is
able to locate that information easily.
Conclusion
It is encouraging to see such a fine selection of software
products for roofing inspection. In general, the products are
professionally designed, marketed, supplied and supported.
All of the products were easy to install and stable in opera-
March 1998 Interface • 17
Dr. Dana Vanier’s current nctii’ities at National Research
C ouncil C anada are related to service life and asset management. He is
the project manager for the Building Envelope Life Cycle Asset
Management (BELCAM) project, and is researching tools and technigues
to help asset managers predict the service life of roofing compo¬
nents and better manage their assets (www.nrc.ca/irc/belcam). Dr
Vanier has been actively engaged in research of electronic technical
information for construction applications. He has also been an associate
editor of the Electronic Journal of Information Technology in
Construction (tvww.ilcon.org) since 1979.
Hitesh Doshi teaches building performance related topics in the
Dept of Architectural Science and Landscape Architecture at Ryerson
Polytechnic Llniversity in Toronto. Ontario. Prior to joining Ryerson
he was with Troiv Consulting Engineers Ltd He has published widely
in technical journals and is a member of the Education Services and
Code Committees of RCL Doshi has served els chairman of the
Committee on Cold Region Corrosion with the National Association of
Brian Kyle, of Public Works and Government Services Canada
(PWGSC) Research, Development and Demonstration Directorate, has
been involved with construction, maintenance and asset management
issues for the past 15 years. As a senior research engineer specializing in
reliability and risk analysis, Brian has been investigating solutions to
the construction industry’s problems related to service life prediction and
product reliability— specifically, the development of analytical tools
and databases for performance modeling of building components and
systems.
R.W. (Bob) Marcellus, P.Eng., President of C.M.E.L
Enterprises Ltd., is a consulting engineer with international experience
which includes risk and reliability analysis, technical audits, project
management, experience with higher end computational methods, data¬
base design, data analysis and interpretation, engineering and research
and development projects. He is the senior author of over too engineer¬
ing reports and public papers and has been the head of C.M.E.L.
Enterprises.
tion. Although most of the products have some very minor
flaws (bugs), none of these prevented the reviewers (or users
in general) from using the products as designed and repre¬
sented. In addition, on a personal note, all of the product
developers were friendly, helpful, informative and knowl¬
edgeable (of both their product and the roofing industry).
As stated earlier, it is not the intention of this report to
rate or rank the products. However, the authors can state
that none of the developers is misrepresenting his products
in literature, and that the evaluations provided in this report
are a fair representation of the listed software features and
capabilities. Of course, there are features and capabilities of
products that are not discussed or identified here, much to
the disappointment of the developers,- this is because these
features are outside of the scope of the review.
It must be remembered that all of these products are mov¬
ing targets, as they are all constantly being updated to
enhance their capabilities and to meet ever-changing hard¬
ware and software requirements and opportunities. This
review, therefore, is a snapshot of features and capabilities of
these products as of January 1998.
All of the software products have a niche market. As can be
gleaned from Appendix A, CAMP is an entry level system
with minimal hardware requirements, REVS is a comprehen¬
sive roofing assessment, recording and reporting database,-
ROOFER is a sophisticated service life prediction tool, and
RoofWork’s strengths are in its data collection, financial mod¬
eling and portfolio analysis. This does not mean that the
above products do not possess any other functions, nor does
it mean that the above products do not possess functionality
attributed to their competitors,- it simply means that, if poten¬
tial users fall into one of these identified niches they should
seriously investigate and evaluate that niche product. They
should also obtain information about the others.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the support of the BELCAM
project and the members of the BELCAM consortium. We
also wish to thank the developers of the products for their
evaluation software, their information and technical support,
and for their cooperation in participating in this evaluation.
Thank you to the staff at the other companies identified in
this report for their time and information, and to Bruce
Holman for contact names and information provided.
is
Amastidi, H., CAD-Building Load Software Review,
Engineered Systems, June 1995, pp 50-67.
Novitski, BJ., Roofing Systems Software, Architecture, Feb.
1992, pp 101-104.
Vanier, DJ., “Benchmark Procedure to Evaluate Computer-
Aided Design and Drafting Systems for Building Industry
Applications,” Building Practice Note 58, NRCC, Ottawa,
1985, p. 58.
About the Authors
Corrosion Engineers, as a director
and secretary of the Ontario
Building Envelope Council
(OBEC), and as chairman of the
Conference on Building Science and
Technology.
18 • Interface March 1998