Skip to main content Skip to footer

The Peculiarities of Historic Slate Roofs with Examples of Wrongful Condemnations

May 15, 2004

6 • IN T E R FA C E NO V E M B E R / D E C E M B E R 2004
THE PECULIARITIES OF HISTORIC SLATE ROOFS
WITH EXAMPLES OF WRONGFUL CONDEMNATIONS
Slate roofs have two unusual
characteristics that set them
apart from most other roofs: 1)
a common slate roof will last a
long time, even centuries; and
2) slate roofs are made of
removable and interchangeable parts – any
individual slate shingle, for example, can be
removed from the roof and replaced, as can
any flashings on the roof. However, these
characteristics can be both a blessing and a
curse.
It’s easy to understand the advantages
of a simple, natural roofing system that can
last centuries, but there is also a disadvantage
to a slate roof’s longevity. A century is
a very long time, and over a period of 100
years, a lot of people can get on the roof and
do a lot of damage, euphemistically
described as “repair.” Repair work by poorly
qualified roofing contractors, building owners,
maintenance personnel, and others
with good intentions but lacking the necessary
skills and knowledge, is a common
blight on historic slate roofs. When a roof
consultant inspects historic slate roofs, he
or she will invariably witness a plethora of
chronic slate repair mistakes. In fact, some
historic slate roofs have been so poorly
maintained and even abused by contractors
that they are condemned by inspectors and
deemed beyond hope.
However, this is where the second characteristic
of slate roofs comes into play. No
matter how poorly repaired and maintained
a slate roof is, if the slate is still good, the
roof can be restored. The bad repairs can be
removed, the tar patches erased, the mismatching
slates replaced, and the roof
returned to its former glory – if the slate is
still good.
It is incumbent upon any professional
roof consultant who claims an expertise in
slate roofing to be familiar with all the types
of slate and the characteristics of each,
including their expected longevity. Roof
slate, stated simply, is stone. It is quarried
up and down the eastern seaboard of the
United States as well as around the world,
yielding many different types, colors, and
characteristics.
Roofing slate can last roughly 55 years
to perhaps 400 years, depending on the
type, thickness, method of attachment,
slope, and other factors. If an historic roof is
100 years old and has slate on it that is historically
proven to last only 100 years, then
the roof is reaching the end of its life, cannot
be restored, and should be replaced
with new slate. On the other hand, if a roof
is 75 years old and has slate on it that is
historically proven to last 150 years, then it
is only halfway through its life and is a
prime candidate for restoration. After 100
years, if the stone is sound, why should the
entire roof be replaced? Any leaks can be
repaired, any flashings replaced, and faulty
repair work redone while leaving the original
stone in place, provided it is still sound.
An historic slate roof halfway through
its life is a very common scenario in the
United States today. Virtually all of these
good roofs will, nevertheless, be condemned
by contractors and consultants who have
little or no experience in slate restoration.
At present, contractors with a vested interest
in roof replacment significantly contribute
to the destruction of many good
slate roofs.
The following are some examples of slate
roofs that illustrate these, and other peculiarities.
BY JOSEPH JENKINS
A recent photo of a barn in Vermont testifies
to the potential longevity of a standard slate
roof. (Photo by Stephen J Taran Jr.)
The Castle Park building, near St.
Louis, is a huge, sprawling, five-story building
with an 850 square slate roof built in
1882. The roof suffered hail and wind damage
in the early 2000s and was subsequently
condemned by contractors who
offered to replace the roof with asphalt
shingles for $10 million. The entire roof was
original – flashings and all – and some leaking
was occurring.
An inspection by the author revealed
that the slates were a Buckingham or Peach
Bottom variety of exceptional quality. There
was essentially no wear visible on the slates
after 120 years. The very steep slopes and
the semi-dry conditions of the area had
helped preserve the copper, most of which
was original. The wind and hail damage on
the roof was quite limited and all of it was
repairable for less than 3% of the replacement
cost. The slates themselves could be
expected to last another century, although
the copper flashings would have to be
replaced eventually. The main leak was in a
copper valley and was unrelated to the
storm damage. Although this beautiful
slate could last at least another century,
contractors were earnestly attemping to
permanently destroy it.
A residence in an upscale Chicago
neighborhood suffered hail damage to its
unique “ragged butt” style 75-year-old slate
roof. Three firms looked at the roof and all
three condemned it before the owner contacted
the author for an impartial inspection.
Hail damage to the mixed Vermont and
Buckingham slate was certainly evident,
but it was limited and all readily repairable
by any contractor with a minimum of slate
roof restoration experience. The inspection
revealed about 150 slates needing to be
replaced – a couple days’ work for experienced
professionals.
The condemning roofing contractors
were evidently influenced by the idea that
insurance money would pay for an entire
new roof. That may have been a much easier
approach for them than trying to duplicate
a slate roof that is a work of art. But
the owner didn’t want a new roof – he liked
the one he had. Yet, if he hadn’t put his foot
down and hired the services of a knowledgeable
roof consultant, he would have
lost both his roof and the character of his
home.
The photo at right is only the entranceway to Castle Park, which has large wings
emanating in three directions. The slate, at 120 years of age, is in excellent condition.
Roofing contractors, however, would love to tear it off. Left: Minimal wind damage
does not justify replacing the entire roof when the slate is still in good shape.
(Photos by Joseph Jenkins.)
Castle Park Apartment Complex – Wrongfully Condemned
Historic Home – Wrongfully Condemned Hail damage of this nature, as seen on
Chicago area “ragged butt” slate roof, is
repairable by simply removing the
damaged slates and replacing them.
Most of the slates are undamaged.
(Photo by Joseph Jenkins.)
Chicago area home with beautiful 75-
year-old “ragged butt” slate roof
condemned by three roofing contractors.
(Photo by Joseph Jenkins.)
NO V E M B E R / D E C E M B E R 2004 I N T E R FA C E • 7
This courthouse roof was unnecessarily condemned and scheduled
for replacement. The Vermont “sea green” slate roof is only 72
years old – about halfway through its life. Comprehensive restoration
work on this roof will only cost 10% of the cost for total
replacement because the slates and fasteners are still in good
condition. Most of the flashings, however, need to be replaced.
(Photo by Joseph Jenkins.)
Most of the problems associated with the Venango County
Courthouse roof were caused by bad repair work over the years,
an example of which is shown at left. The wrong type and color of
slates were used to repair this roof, indicating the repair
contractor didn’t understand proper restoration techniques. These
will all need to be removed and replaced with slates that match
the original roof. The author counted approximately 700 slates
like this on the courthouse roof. (Photo by Joseph Jenkins.)
8 • IN T E R FA C E NO V E M B E R / D E C E M B E R 2004
Venango County Courthouse – Wrongfully Condemmed
In 2004, the author was called to consult on the
replacement of a Pennsylvania courthouse roof. The 130-
square Vermont “sea green” slate roof was approximately 72
years old. A county engineer insisted that the roof was
beyond repair and was “absolutely certain” it had to be
completely replaced. The author’s inspection revealed that
most of the problems with the roof were related to bad
repairs in the past, all reversible. The slate itself was still
good and could be expected to last at least another 50 years
if not 75 or more. Replacement costs of $358,451 were
reduced to restoration costs of $35,000, which included
replacement of virtually all flashings with stainless steel – a
savings to the cash-strapped county of over $300,000.
NO V E M B E R / D E C E M B E R 2004 I N T E R FA C E • 9
Smithsonian Institute Building – The Castle
The huge Smithsonian building
known as “The Castle” in
Washington, D.C. has a slate roof
measuring several hundred
squares in area. In 2000, the roof
leaked in several places, generating
talk of replacement – a very expensive
proposition. An inspection by
the author revealed that the roof
had recently been replaced. The
slate roof on the Castle was only
about 25 years old, having already
been replaced with new Buckingham
slates (although some of the
original slates had been reused).
The majority of the flashings had
also been replaced with new copper.
Apparently, some of the more
important historical buildings in
our nation’s capital had been
refurbished around the time of the
bicentennial in 1976. At about that
time, the Castle got a new roof. For
some unknown reason, however,
not all of the Castle’s flashings had
been replaced. Four main central
valleys and the flashings along two
parapet walls had been left as original,
and they now leaked.
Furthermore, the maintenance
crew had the habit of tromping on
the slate roof in what appeared to
be combat boots, crunching the
slates underfoot, breaking them,
and adding to the roof problems.
The solutions were simple and relatively
inexpensive: replace the old
flashings with new copper and
keep people off the roof who don’t
belong there.
The Smithsonian Institute Building known as “The Castle” had
already been replaced with new slate, but some of the original
flashings had been left in place, and they leaked. The author is
inspecting the roof in the photo above. (Photographer unknown.)
Ten-year-old slate roof on a private
residence condemned by roofing
contractors. The nominal snow guard
damage, however, was covered by
homeowner’s insurance; the roof did not
need to be replaced at all.
(Photo by Joseph Jenkins.)
Private Residence – Wrongfully Condemned
For what it’s worth, even newer
slate roofs fall prey to unscrupulous
roofing contractors. A house just
outside New York City had a tenyear-
old Vermont mixed slate roof. In
the spring of the year, the owner
found some slates on the ground,
along with some snow guards. A
local “third generation slate roofing expert”
was called to the scene. He promptly condemned
the 100 square roof and offered to
replace it for $450,000. The owner then called
the author for a second opinion.
The author’s inspection revealed that the
snow guards had let loose due to severe
weather that winter, combined with an inadequate
number of snow guards for the size and
slope of the roof. Each snow guard was
hooked onto a slating nail, causing a slate to
be pulled out with the snow guard. The damages
amounted to a maximum of $10,000 and
all of it was covered by homeowner’s insurance.
Otherwise, the roof was fine. So much
for “experts.”
Joseph Jenkins is the author of three books, including the
multiple award-winning Slate Roof Bible. He writes for, edits,
and publishes the Traditional Roofing Magazine (traditionalroofing.
com), and has written about slate roofs for Traditional
Building Magazine, Period Homes Magazine, and Interface
Journal. Jenkins has been featured on Home and Garden TV
and has personally worked on over 1,000 slate roofs while
maintaining a slate and tile roof restoration business in
northwestern Pennsylvania. Jenkins is on the board of directors
of the National Slate Association and provides slate roof consulting services nationwide.
A presenter on the topic of slate roof restoration at the past seven International
Preservation Trades Workshops, he has also conducted slate roofing presentations for
the Natural Building Colloquium, the National Slate Association, the Restoration and
Renovation Trade Show, the Roof Consultants Institute, the Spanish slate industry, and
other venues. His website at jenkinsslate.com provides information on slate and tile roof
repair, slate roof installation, roofing contractors, industry contacts, tools, techniques,
and public messages about slate, tile, and asbestos roofing.
Joseph Jenkins
10 • I N T E R FA C E NO V E M B E R / D E C E M B E R 2004
A slate roof will wear out, of course, and
at the end of its life, nothing can save it.
This was the case with the Cathedral of St.
Andrew in Arkansas. The cathedral roof
was made up of Pennsylvania black slates
and Vermont unfading green slates mixed
in an ornate pattern. At 120 years of age,
the PA black slate had simply worn out –
become soft, flaky, and falling apart – especially
on the southern exposure and on the
main body of the church. The Vermont
unfading green slates showed almost no
wear at all, despite their age of 120 years.
The original roof was inspected by the
author to determine its condition and to
draw up specifications for replacement. The
new slate roof was subsequently installed
by Midland Engineering of South Bend,
Indiana, to match the original roof. This
time, however, Vermont unfading green
slates were mixed with Welsh black slates
from Cwt-y-Bugail. All of the copper flashings
were replaced with terne-coated stainless
steel (some 4-lb. sheet lead was also
used). The new slate roof is expected to last
at least 150 years.
Remember one simple rule regarding the
restoration of slates roofs: if the slate is still
good, the roof can usually be repaired and/or
restored. One can visually inspect the slate to
determine its condition. If the surface is
smooth, the slate is probably still good. If the
surface is crumbly and flaky and if there are
The Cathedral of St. Andrew in Little Rock, Arkansas, had
worn out its black Pennsylvania slate after 120 years
(below). The cathedral’s new roof, left, installed by
Midland Engineering in 2003, is likely to last 150 years.
Vermont unfading green slate mixed with Welsh black
slate and terne-coated stainless steel flashings should
outperform the original roof. (Photo below by Joseph
Jenkins; left photo by Lyle Bandurski.)
Cathedral in Arkansas – Rightfully
Condemned
(But Replaced with New Slate)
slates sliding off the roof here and there, you
may be looking at a roof that is ready to retire.
It certainly helps to be able to identify the type
of slate that is on the roof.
In summary, slate roofs are in a world of
their own. They require specific knowledge and
expertise. Genuine experts in the field are rare
and there are many “pretenders” whose advice
should be taken with a grain of salt. A second
opinion can be very valuable if it’s coming from
the right source.