Skip to main content Skip to footer

Roofing Bitumen “Probably Carcinogenic”, Says IARC

January 27, 2012

On October 18, 2011, a
Work ing Group of the World
Health Organization (WHO)
International Agency for Re –
search on Cancer (IARC)
drew a distinction among
certain forms of bitumen, classifying occupational
exposures to oxidized bitumen,
such as those found in roofing asphalt, as
“probably carcinogenic to humans” (Group
2A). In addition, IARC classified exposures
to hard bitumen and “straight-run” bitumen
as “possibly carcinogenic,” or Group 2B.
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES TO BITUMENS AND
THEIR EMISSIONS
Under the IARC Monographs program,
a working group reevaluated various occupations
that involve exposures to bitumens
and bitumen emissions, including road
paving, roofing, and application of mastic
asphalt. The Working Group concluded
that:
• Occupational exposures to oxidized
bitumens and their emissions during
roofing are “probably carcinogenic
to humans” (Group 2A);
• Occupational exposures to hard
bitumens and their emissions during
mastic asphalt work are “possibly
carcinogenic to humans” (Group
2B); and
• Occupational exposures to straightrun
bitumens and their emissions
during road paving are “possibly carcinogenic
to humans” (Group 2B).
WHAT DO THESE CLASSIFICATIONS MEAN?
The IARC monographs identify environmental
factors that can increase the risk of
human cancer. National health agencies
around the world use this information as
scientific support for their actions to prevent
exposure to potential carcinogens.
Working groups of scientists review published
studies and evaluate the weight of
the evidence that an agent can increase the
risk of cancer. IARC defines four overall
Groups, from “agents that are carcinogenic
to humans” (Group 1) to “agents that are
probably not carcinogenic to humans”
(Group 4). This latest announcement
involves two subcategories within Group 2.
Group 2 includes agents for which, at
one extreme, the degree of evidence of carcinogenicity
in humans is present but limited,
and therefore assigned to “probably
carcinogenic to humans” (Group 2A). This
category is generally used when there is
J A N U A RY 2012 I N T E R FA C E • 3 5
36 • I N T E R FA C E J A N U A RY 2012
At your own pace,
􀁒􀁑􀀃􀁜􀁒􀁘􀁕􀀃􀁒􀁚􀁑􀀃􀁗􀁌􀁐􀁈􀀏􀀃􀁄􀁗􀀃􀁜􀁒􀁘􀁕􀀃􀂿􀁑􀁊􀁈􀁕􀁗􀁌􀁓􀁖􀀃􀀑􀀑􀀑
Roof Drainage
Design
Roof System Thermal and
Moisture
Design
􀀕􀂑􀂑􀏐􀂋􀂐􀂉􀀃􀀅􀂃􀂕􀂋􀂅􀂕
􀀕􀂑􀂑􀏐􀂋􀂐􀂉􀀃􀀗􀂇􀂅􀂊􀂐􀂑􀂎􀂑􀂉􀂛􀀃
􀂃􀂐􀂆􀀃􀀖􀂅􀂋􀂇􀂐􀂅􀂇􀀃􀀌
􀀕􀂑􀂑􀏐􀂋􀂐􀂉􀀃􀀗􀂇􀂅􀂊􀂐􀂑􀂎􀂑􀂉􀂛􀀃
􀂃􀂐􀂆􀀃􀀖􀂅􀂋􀂇􀂐􀂅􀂇􀀃􀀌􀀌
Wind Design for
􀀏􀂑􀂙􀇦􀀖􀂎􀂑􀂒􀂇􀀃􀀕􀂑􀂑􀂈􀂕􀀃􀇦􀀃􀀓􀂃􀂔􀂖􀀃􀀌􀇣􀀃􀀘􀂐-
derstanding ASCE 7-05 Wind
􀀏􀂑􀂃􀂆􀀃􀀆􀂃􀂎􀂅􀂗􀂎􀂃􀂖􀂋􀂑􀂐􀂕
Wind Design for
􀀏􀂑􀂙􀇦􀀖􀂎􀂑􀂒􀂇􀀃􀀕􀂑􀂑􀂈􀂕􀀃􀇦􀀃􀀓􀂃􀂔􀂖􀀃􀀌􀀌􀇣􀀃􀀉􀀐􀀃
Global Guidelines and 􀀅􀂇􀂕􀂖􀀃
􀀓􀂔􀂃􀂅􀂖􀂋􀂅􀂇􀀃􀀆􀂑􀂐􀂕􀂋􀂆􀂇􀂔􀂃􀂖􀂋􀂑􀂐􀂕
www.rci-e-learning.org
􀀲􀁑􀁏􀁌􀁑􀁈􀀃􀀨􀁇􀁘􀁆􀁄􀁗􀁌􀁒􀁑􀁄􀁏􀀃􀀳􀁕􀁒􀁊􀁕􀁄􀁐􀁖
n
Therm
ng.mal g
􀀏􀂑􀂙 􀀖􀂎􀂑􀂒􀂇 􀀕􀂑􀂑􀂈􀂕 􀀓􀂃􀂔
Des
􀂃􀂐􀂆􀀃􀀖􀂅􀂋
􀀕􀂑􀂑􀏐􀂋􀂐􀂉􀀃􀀗􀂇􀂅􀂊
􀂃􀂐􀂆􀀃􀀖􀂅
􀀕􀂑􀂑􀏐􀂋􀂐􀂉􀀃􀀗􀂇􀂅􀂊
􀀕􀂑􀂑􀏐􀂋􀂐􀂉
􀂔􀂖 􀀌􀇣 􀀘􀂐
sign 􀂋􀂇􀂐􀂅􀂇􀀃􀀌􀀌
􀂊􀂐􀂑􀂎􀂑􀂉􀂛􀀃
􀂅􀂋􀂇􀂐􀂅􀂇􀀃􀀌
􀂊􀂐􀂑􀂎􀂑􀂉􀂛􀀃
􀂉􀀃􀀅􀂃􀂕􀂋􀂅􀂕
􀀓􀂔􀂃􀂅􀂖􀂋􀂅􀂇􀀃􀀆􀂑􀂐􀂕􀂋􀂆􀂇
a
􀀏􀂑􀂙􀇦􀀖􀂎􀂑􀂒􀂇􀀃􀀕􀂑􀂑􀂈􀂕􀀃􀇦􀀃􀀓􀂃􀂔
Des
􀀏􀂑􀂃􀂆 􀀆􀂃􀂎􀂅􀂗
0
􀀏􀂑􀂙􀇦􀀖􀂎􀂑􀂒􀂇􀀃􀀕􀂑􀂑􀂈􀂕 􀇦 􀀲􀁑􀁏􀁌􀁌􀁑􀁑􀁈􀀃􀀨􀁇􀁘􀁆􀁄􀁗􀁌􀁌􀁒􀁒􀁑􀁄􀁏􀀃􀀳􀁕􀁒
􀂇􀂔􀂃􀂖􀂋􀂑􀂐􀂕
nd 􀂔􀂖􀀃􀀌􀀌􀇣􀀃􀀉􀀐􀀃
sign 􀂗􀂎􀂃􀂖􀂋􀂑􀂐􀂕
5Wind –
􀁕􀁒􀁊􀁕􀁄􀁐􀁖
limited evidence of carcinogenicity in
humans and sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity
in experimental animals.
At the other extreme of Group 2, there
may be no human data, but there is evidence
of carcinogenicity in experimental
animals. The agent is assigned to “possibly
carcinogenic to humans” (Group 2B). This
category is used for agents for which there
is limited evidence of carcinogenicity in
humans and less than sufficient evidence of
such in experimental animals. It may also
be used when there is inadequate evidence
of carcinogenicity in humans but there is
sufficient evidence of it in experimental animals.
The terms “probably carcinogenic” and
“possibly carcinogenic” have no quantitative
significance and are used simply as descriptors
of different levels of evidence of human
carcinogenicity, with “probably carcinogenic”
signifying a higher level of evidence
than “possibly carcinogenic.”
BACKGROUND ON IARC’S RECENT ANNOUNCEMENT
Bitumens are produced by distillation of
crude oil during petroleum refining and also
occur naturally. Bitumens can be divided
into broad classes according to their physical
properties and specifications required
for different uses. The main use of bitumens
is in asphalt for road paving, as well as roofing,
waterproofing and sealing, and painting.
Application of bitumens may generate
airborne emissions.
Bitumen was reviewed by previous IARC
Monographs working groups in 1985 and in
1987. At the time, studies on exposed workers
were few, and their results were difficult
to interpret because of concurrent exposure
to coal tar, a known cancer-causing compound,
and other exposures (e.g., diesel
engine exhaust, silica, etc.). Different types
of extracts, fume condensates, and pooled
mixtures of bitumens had been tested in
experimental animals, and there was sufficient
evidence for the carcinogenicity of
some of them.
KEY ADDITIONAL STUDIES
A number of additional epidemiological
studies were now available to the IARC
working group, including a compilation of
20 studies published up until 1994, a number
of additional individual studies, and
IARC’s own cohort study. In addition, a
large number of studies in exposed workers,
animals, and cellular experimental systems
have become available.
CONCLUSIONS OF THE IARC WORKING GROUP
The primary conclusion of the IARC
working group of relevance to RCI relates to
occupational exposures to oxidized bitumens
and their emissions during roofing.
The working group concluded that the body
of available data from cancer studies in
humans points to an association between
exposure to oxidized bitumens during roofing
and lung cancer and tumors in the
upper respiratory/digestive tract. In support
of these findings, extracts and fume
condensates of oxidized bitumens, which
are used primarily in roofing applications,
showed sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity
in experimental animals. Taking these
data together, the working group classified
occupational exposures to oxidized bitumens
and their emissions during roofing as
“probably carcinogenic to humans” (Group
2A).
The working group also concluded that
there was limited evidence in humans for
the carcinogenicity of occupational exposures
during mastic asphalt work, based on
two positive studies among mastic asphalt
workers. These types of “hard” bitumens
have not been tested in experimental animals.
As a result, occupational exposures to
hard bitumens and their emissions during
mastic asphalt work were classified as “possibly
carcinogenic to humans” (Group 2B).
Similarly, the working group concluded
that there was inadequate evidence in
humans or experimental animals for the
carcinogenicity of occupational exposures
during road paving with “straight-run” bitumens.
However, studies of workers exposed
to bitumen emissions during paving with
straight-run bitumens showed mutagenic
and genotoxic effects (DNA/reproductive) in
these workers. This evidence led to the classification
of occupational exposures to
straight-run bitumens and their emissions
during road paving as “possibly carcinogenic
to humans” (Group 2B).
REGULATORY IMPACT
IARC has no regulatory authority within
the United States. However, under
OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard
(29 CFR 1910.1200), manufacturers and
importers of hazardous substances are
required to evaluate products they introduce
into the workplace. This hazard determination
must consider the carcinogenicity
of chemicals. OSHA has indicated that any
listing in the latest edition of the IARC
Monographs establishes carcinogenic or
potential carcinogenic risk for hazard communication
purposes. For manufacturers,
this may trigger certain changes in reporting
on items like Material Safety Data
Sheets and product labels. For employers,
it may trigger modifications to written hazard
communication and training programs.
While not required by the Hazard Com –
muni cation standard, this change may also
trigger worker exposure monitoring re –
quire ments as part of OSHA’s Respiratory
Protection standard. RCI members should
fully consider the ramification of this new
IARC listing.
J A N U A RY 2012 I N T E R FA C E • 3 7
Dan Adley is the chief operating officer of KTA-Tator, Inc., a
Pittsburgh, PA, consulting engineering firm with specialization
in the commercial buildings sector. Dan is a Certified
Industrial Hygienist (CIH) and Certified Safety Professional
(CSP) with 35 years of diversified environmental, health, and
safety consulting experience.
Dan Adley, CIH, CSP
RCI is looking for photography of consultants in action.
• On ladders and roofs
• Using technology: IR tools, wind-uplift chambers,
computers, etc.
• Performing inspections: roofs, walls,
and waterproofing
Selected photos will be used in publication,
in advertising, on Web sites, and in emails.
Photo credit will be given to the
photographer or company.
Please submit high-resolution digital
photos as well as photographer
information and a short caption to
wmyers@rci-online.org.
Once submitted, copyright is owned by RCI, Inc. Contact William Myers, director of marketing
communications, at 919-389-1088 or wmyers@rci-online.org for more information.
On November 6, the International
Code Council (ICC) approved the
nation’ s first green model code for
new and existing commercial buildings.
The 2012 International Green
Construction Code (IgCC) provides
model language for municipalities to
use in developing regulations related
to energy conservation, water efficiency,
building waste, and materials.
The new code, however, does not
allow an “ outcome-based” path that
would have allowed builders to comply
with the code by demonstrating
actual energy performance once
buildings are operational. This was an
option that would have allowed
designers more flexibility in meeting
green codes, some claim.
— ENR
ICC APPROVES
GREEN MODEL
CODE