Skip to main content Skip to footer

The Application of Sprayed Polyurethane Foam and Elastomeric Coatings for Repair and Maintenance of Bituminous Roof Systems

March 26, 2004

The Application of Sprayed Polyurethane Foam
and Elastomeric Coatings for Repair and
Maintenance of Bituminous Roof Systems

 

Robb Smith, RRO, RRC, FRCI • Amtech Roofing Consultants Inc., Seattle, WA
Dan Varvais • Applied Polymer Systems, Placerville, CA
ABSTRACT
This paper discusses the range of conditions, proper inspection, roof evaluation, and
how roof details that are customarily only addressed with bituminous materials can be
addressed with spray polyurethane foam and provide a longterm, durable, and costeffective
low maintenance solution. SPF flashing applied in conjunction with elas¬
tomeric coatings also provide building owners with a “maintenance and repair” option
that can better fit their budget restraints, provide tax incentives, and offer an energy
efficient “cool roof’ solution for their buildings.
Today’s economy has put significant restraints on capital expenditures related to the
roofing industry. This paper will broaden the consultant’s exposure to Roof Asset
Management and offer cost effective solutions for their clients. Using this approach as
a viable tool can help increase the consultant’s client base.
Robb Smith, RRO, RRC, FRCI
Robb G. Smith, RRO, RRC, FRCI, is a senior consultant with Amtech Roofing Consultants, Inc., in
Seattle, WA. Robb, a past president of RCI, has been working in the roofing industry for over 25 years, 16
of which he has been an independent roof consultant while providing services to institutional and com¬
mercial clients. He has served on the Accreditation Committee of Spray Polyurethane Foam Alliance for
over seven years.
Dan Varvais
For over a decade, Dan Varvais has been helping building owners, facility managers, architects, con¬
sultants, and other roof specifiers evaluate roofs for maintenance and repair options. Dan serves on the
SPFA Accreditation Committee and has been a keynote speaker for the California Energy Commission and
California Public Utility Commission’s educational outreach program throughout the state on cool roof
technologies.
Smith and Varvais — 79

 

The Application of Sprayed Polyurethane Foam
and Elastomeric Coatings for Repair and
Maintenance of Bituminous Roof Systems

 

INTRODUCTION
Bituminous products, asphalt, and coal tar pitch have
been widely used for low slope roofing for over a centu¬
ry. Throughout the history of bituminous roofing, irregu¬
lar or continuous pipe and conduit penetrations have
been sealed (flashed) with “pitch pockets,” so named
because the sheet metal formed around the penetration
became a “pocket” to hold coal tar “pitch.” The pocket,
or “pan” as it is now called, is generally specified to be
approximately 4″ high and large enough to provide
approximately 2″ clearance from the penetration. The
base of the pan is specified to have a full 4″ flange
(including inside comers filled with sheet metal) and all
joints/seams soldered.
While both coal tar and asphalt are thermoplastic
materials, only Type I asphalt will exhibit cold flow simi¬
lar to coal tar. Today, when there is only a rare use of
coal tar pitch and Type I asphalt as the interply bitumen,
the same Type III or IV oxidized asphalt used for the
interply adhesive is poured into the pocket or pan. In lieu
of hot asphalt, the pan is filled with a combination of
cementitious grout and topped off with either asphalt
mastic or polyurethane sealant. All of these methods age
through the process of oxidation and/or evaporation
resulting in gaps between the metal surfaces and the fill¬
ing thereby requiring periodic maintenance to keep them
watertight. Conventional pitch pans have their advan¬
tages and disadvantages, with the most common correla¬
tion to each being: advantage – low cost; disadvantage –
regular maintenance required.
Another high maintenance flashing condition is
found on parapets, particularly those over 24″ high.
These taller parapets present challenges for roofing
mechanics to maintain asphalt at proper equiviscous tem¬
perature (EVT) when attempting to adhere mineral sur¬
faced cap sheets or even ply felt. When asphalt is applied
below the EVT, the felt and cap sheet will not properly
laminate with the asphalt, resulting in large blisters form¬
ing into the wall flashing system. As a result, a variety of
conditions develop which are detrimental to the perfor¬
mance of the wall flashing. These include sagging, open
lap seams, and fracturing. Because solar heat gain is
SPF gun and foam from a portable foam kit.
accentuated on the west and south slopes, these condi¬
tions are more severe at those locations.
At raised or canted metal edges and equipment curbs,
the conditions are similar, though not as critical when
water is not directed to drain across them. Similar to
parapets relative to their position towards the sun, these
areas of flashing will deteriorate more rapidly.
Why do we focus on curbs, penetrations, and perime¬
ter flashing? Because 80% to 90% of all roof leaks origi¬
nate at roof terminations. And, we know that many roof¬
ing manufacturers’ warranties exclude leaks from materi¬
als and workmanship defects located at these points.
Betterment of these conditions can be achieved with
application quality control and regular maintenance;
however, this is more easily said than done. While more
and more decision makers understand the benefits of a
pro-active approach to roofing, the vast majority lives in
a firefighter’s mentality of responding to the greatest
emergency first, and then moving onto the next. Issues
Smith and Varvais — 81
Application of SPF from trailer-mounted spray rig.
AGING OF BITUMINOUS MATERIALS
The advantages of using either asphalt or coal tar as
an interply adhesive are not similarly found when used in
flashing assemblies. In the long run, the negative perfor¬
mance traits of oxidation and evaporation during aging
outweigh the low cost benefit. As described by Ken
Brzozowski in an earlier Interface article, “The primary
weathering mechanism of asphalt on the roof is the same
oxidation which takes place in the blowing step. There is,
however, also some loss of lighter, more volatile asphalt
components due to the high rooftop temperatures mem¬
branes experience. Both these mechanisms lead to a
hardening of the asphalt.” As asphalt oxidizes and loses
volatiles, it shrinks in mass, leaving gaps between metal
components it is supposed to be sealing. Coal tar evapo¬
rates during the aging process, but the net result in the
same, loss in volume results in gaps between the metal
and the bitumen.
such as full time application observation and annual
maintenance frequently are cut by necessity under tight
budget constraints.
Observations of the authors during the application of
hundreds of SPF roofs over the last 15 years have fur¬
thered our understanding and support for the use of SPF
for remediation and maintenance of BUR and modified
bitumen roof assemblies and provide the basis for this
paper. This paper will discuss alternative solutions to key
flashing conditions, taking into consideration that the
ultimate goal is to provide a roof system that requires the
least amount of maintenance at a reasonable cost.

LONG TERM FLASHING SOLUTION

As discussed above, leaks in built-up and modified
bitumen roof systems don’t typically occur in the field of
the roof, but rather at pipe, conduit, and equipment curb
penetrations and around the perimeter of roofs. Given the
inherent aging mechanisms of bituminous materials, it is
logical to seal these points with an alternate material that
isn’t prone to shrinking en masse, and remains adhered
to applied surfaces. SPF with good quality roof coatings
will provide seven to ten years of service with potentially
no maintenance.
New conduit penetrations.
Smith and Varvais — 82
Raised edge flashing repair, before (left) and after (right).
WARRANTY CONCERNS
Traditionally, roofing manufacturers have required
that all repairs to their roof system be completed by one
of their approved/licensed applicators, using their materi¬
als. It is worth noting that many manufacturers specifi¬
cally deny warranty claims that are associated with metal
flashing which is not supplied by the manufacturer. This
typically applies to all perimeter metal edge, counter
flashing, lead jacks, and pitch pans. Therefore, if a better
acceptance of the proposed work and how it will alter the
existing roof system. Legal counsel should be contacted
to address specific language and concerns.
SPRAYED POLYURETHANE FOAM
Without getting into detailed chemistry, SPF is the
result of mixing two components, known as the ‘A’ and
‘B’ sides, in equal proportion. The resulting chemical
reaction creates heat and the liquid expands and cools
solution is available it should be considered.
Any time consideration is given to repairing
or in some way altering an existing roof, it is pru¬
dent to have the owner research the records for the
existence of the roofing manufacturer’s warranty
to determine what limitations or restrictions are
included in the roof warranty. This process might
be informative on several fronts, and it is suggest¬
ed that before undertaking any maintenance scope
of work, one should have a release signed by the
owner that indicates their acknowledgment and
into a solid, cellular plastic mass. The resultant
foam is 90% closed cell, which is the basis of
its waterproofing characteristic. Without coat¬
ing, SPF will maintain a watertight seal. This
fact has been proven over years of roofing with
uncoated foam, surfaced only with loose river
rock, similar to single ply ballast. Absent the
Smith and Varvais — 83
Ohl pitch pun. with dried asphalt mastic.
alternatives systems are available for
smaller roof maintenance work.
The efficient and economical mainte¬
nance alternative to the above is found in
35-lb. cartons containing the ‘ V and B’
maleiiaK with si\ disposable spiay guns.
These ate ideal for the application ol’SI’F
for small roof maintenance protects, repair¬
ing buined-oul curb Hashing, and sealing
pitch pans and new penetrations.
For about S325. one kit ot material
contains appioximalelv 100 board leet of
2.75 pcf density SPF. This volume will
supply enough SPF to seal approximately
surface vover of iocL or coaling. SPF will
degrade undci UV light. Typically. 25 dry mils of
coating are sufficient to protect SPF from I V
light.
SPF’ has been successfully used as a rooting
system loi over three decades. A majority of SPF’
roof applications consist ol spraying foam ovei
existing roof assemblies. SPF provides a n imbei
of advantages when -eroofing over old roofs.
These include:
• Excellent adhesion to pi epaied sui faces,
• Ease of adding slope to drain on flat roofs,
• Enhancing the dimension of crickets,
• Increasing roof insulation,
• Covering of asbestos roofing materials; and
• Sealing of penetrations and curbs.
SPF APPLICATION
Most SPF roofing is supplied by contractors which
have a 30 kW generator, a material and hose metering
unit with heater, and high pressure 45:1 hydraulic pumps,
all contained within a large, truck-mounted van or fifth
wheel trailer. These types of rigs are necessary to supply
large volumes of material when completing entire roof
restoration projects, or applying entire new SPF roof, but
SPF and acrylic coating with ceramic granules, used to
seal the pitch pan in the photo at the top.
75 typical 6″x 6″ pitch pans or 100 3″ plumbing vent
pipes. SPF in these smaller kits is available in lower den¬
sities, but densities below 2.7 pef are not recommended
for roofing applications. Dow Chemical provides nation¬
al distribution of this material, with regional distributors
like DAS Products stocking product in Arizona.
As with any roof maintenance activity, if the desired
goal is longterm durability, then surface preparation is
key. Rule Number One: SPF is not designed to solve
active, wet condition leaks. On built-up and modified
bitumen roofs, those conditions are still best suited for
the application of coal tar mastic and fiberglass web.
Moisture and SPF in a liquid state during application are
not compatible, and blistering of the SPF will result.
Smith and Varvais — 84
However, when the roof is dry, most surfaces only
require sweeping to remove any dirt or debris or old
coatings which are not well adhered. Some surfaces, such
as smooth APP and galvanized sheet metal, may require
the application of a primer. The foam manufacturer will
guide you through these decisions.
The skill necessary to apply SPF is more refined than
what is needed to apply spray paint, and if the applicator
hasn’t sprayed foam before, it is recommended that one
practice on a sheet of plastic. With a cardboard box
placed in the center of the plastic, one can gain experi¬
ence in spraying vertical surfaces as well. This training
exercise might consume half of the kit to develop suffi¬
cient skill. The goal is to apply the SPF with a fairly
smooth surface, as the rougher surface is not conducive
to attaining a continuous film of coating. Should some
rough surfaces develop, these can be cut down with a
long fillet knife or ground off with a powered sanding
disk. These tools and practices are commonly used by
SPF contractors and the work can be accomplished
quickly only minutes after the foam is applied.
However, it is a very large step from sealing pitch
pans and other roof penetrations and base flashings with
a small box of foam to making more extensive repairs. It
is worth the time and investment to hire a qualified SPF
contractor when repairs include parapet wall flashings,
large mechanical units, duct work and or build crickets to
assist in drainage.
After the foam is applied and smoothed as necessary,
the SPF surface and a few inches of the surrounding roof
Left: Edge termination
-SPF.
Right: Metal counterflashing
is not used when pipe is sup¬
ported by roof deck.
Smith and Varvais — 85
surface should be sealed with a roof coating. The most
common coatings for this purpose are formulated from
acrylic polymers, although polyurethane and silicone
coatings are also available. Acrylic exterior house paint
will not provide the necessary performance characteris¬
tics to survive in this application long term as compared
to a quality roof coating. Application by airless spray gun
is efficient for a large quantity of repairs; however, paint¬
ing the coating on by brush or roller is also acceptable
for smaller projects. Two coats are recommended to
achieve a sufficient mil thickness.
Many situations justify the application of a coating
system over the entire membrane to reduce membrane
temperatures, decrease the degradation of the membrane,
and reduce cooling loads. A quality oriented manufactur¬
er will often offer a warranty for these restoration appli¬
cations.
CONCLUSIONS
Bituminous-based products have inherent aging
properties that require that they receive periodic mainte¬
nance. SPF is available in portable 35-lb. kits affording
the use of SPF for small projects without the need for a
large crew and extensive equipment. By fully covering
pitch pans or sealing around pipe penetrations with
sprayed polyurethane foam and coating, the maintenance
requirement is greatly reduced. The application of foam
and coating for sealing of penetration and curb flashing
is economical and efficient, and will provide durable,
watertight flashing for many years of service.
Smith and Varvais — 86