Skip to main content Skip to footer

IIBEC Technical Advisory No. 007-2014: A Roof Dilemma: Surface Defects Requiring Repair or Surface Imperfections Not Requiring Repair?

October 4, 2014

Technical Advisory
SURFACE DEFECTS OR IMPERFECTIONS?- 7 2014
TITLE: A Roof Dilemma: Surface Defects Requiring Repair or Surface Imperfections Not Requiring Repair?
DESIGNATION: IIBEC-TA-007-2014
OBJECTIVE: To provide recommendations for addressing whether imperfections in the
surface of a newly installed roof are considered to be surface defects
impairing the performance of the roof, or are surface imperfections and
simply aesthetically distracting.
A. BACKGROUND
In the course of normal activities, consultants or others acting on behalf of the owner can be largely responsible
for the development of observation criteria, observations, and acceptance of finished roofing systems. During
construction and installation, roof materials are often at risk of becoming scratched, dented, or subjected to
other types of physical action, such as oil canning, that result in surface imperfections that are cosmetic and
surface defects that require repair.
Often, the owner cannot discern whether the resulting roof’s performance will be affected or if the
imperfections are simply cosmetic.
The contractor typically relies on the manufacturer to support a claim of unimpaired roof performance.
The roof consultant is usually retained by the owner to inspect a roof and render an opinion about the condition
of the roof, commonly including these types of surface “imperfections.”
Determining whether the imperfections will affect the performance of the roof or are simply cosmetic may
create a conflict between the owner/roof consultant and the contractor/manufacturer.
B. CONSULTANT ROLE
How does a consultant determine if the imperfection will affect the performance of the roof? Without industry
standards or code requirements, it is often left to the consultant to develop criteria for determining whether the
roof’s performance will be affected or if the condition is simply cosmetic. Some of the important considerations
are:
i. The number and severity of the imperfections
ii. Whether the imperfections require repair
iii. Whether the material can be repaired
iv. How easily repairs can be made
DISCLAIMER
This Technical Advisory is intended to serve only as a general resource and to identify potential issues for
consideration by industry professionals. Each person using this Technical Advisory is solely responsible for the
evaluation of the Technical Advisory in light of the unique circumstances of any particular situation, must
independently determine the applicability of such information, and assumes all risks in connection with the use of
such information. The materials contained in this Technical Advisory do not supersede any code, rule, regulation, or
legislation and are not intended to represent the standard of care in any jurisdiction.
Technical Advisory
SURFACE DEFECTS OR IMPERFECTIONS?- 7 2014
v. If the imperfections or repairs will shorten the life of the roof
vi. If any repairs will affect the life of the roof
vii. If the imperfections or repairs will lead to leaks, deterioration of materials, or other unintended
consequences
viii. If the imperfections or repairs will affect the warranty
C. RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that designers discuss the expectations of the end product with the owner at the beginning of
the design process and discuss acceptable surface imperfections with the owner at that time.
i. Project specifications should address how the acceptance or rejection of surface
imperfections/defects will be determined, and by whom.
ii. The specifications should clearly outline the types of surface imperfections/defects for the project
type and their identification (percentage or quantity), as well as specify their corrective
requirements, and thus provide a level of acceptability to the owner.
iii. Consideration should be given to including a statement in the specifications that the final
acceptance of the finished roof surfaces will be at the discretion of the owner/consultant.
If the pricing has been developed yet the project has not been constructed, a modification to the specifications
may be helpful to the owner and the contractor, avoiding conflict after the roof assembly is installed.
Levels of acceptance must be reasonable to achieve so as to minimize the impact to the cost or duration of the
project.
Similar considerations shall be utilized when requiring repairs or replacement of materials.
2