Skip to main content Skip to footer

Project Profile: Expansion Joint Curve/Valley Intersection on Metal Roofing – A Case Study

December 5, 2016

In February of 2016, NB Handy
Company was contacted by the roofing
contractor installing the metal
roofing assembly on the Academic
Instruction Building of the U.S. Naval
Facilities Engineering Command at
Camp Johnson, a satellite camp of the
Marine Corps base at Camp Lejeune in
Jacksonville, NC (see the project information
in the adjacent box). The assembly for
the main roof of this project included the
following:
• 1½-in., 20-gauge, type “B” metal
roof decking
• ½-in. glass mat
gypsum sheathing,
meeting ASTM
E84, Standard Test
Method for Surface
Burning Characteristics
of Building
Materials, with a
flame spread = 0 and
a smoke spread = 0
• Two layers of 3-in.
m a n u f a c t u r e r –
approved polyisocyanurate
roof insulation
board (R-30.6)
with joints in the
successive layer,
staggered a minimum
of 6 in.
from the preceding
layer in both
directions
• -in. glass mat
gypsum sheathing,
secured with
insulation fasteners
and 3-in.-diameter insulation
plates installed in a fastening pattern
allowing for five square drive
fasteners and 3-in.-diameter plates
per 4- x 8-ft. sheet. Cover board
and insulation securement utilized
#14 13- x 10-in. DP1 pancake-head
carbon steel epoxy-coated fasteners.
P-003 Staff nCo academy facilities
academic instruction Building
naval facilities engineering Command – Mid-atlantic
United States Marine Corps Base
Camp Johnson, North Carolina
Project #15BCX-010
Figure 1 – Roof plan
(expansion joint curb runs
just right of center, parallel
to the main roof slope).
Figure 2 – Expansion joint curb
(noted as segmented line and
delineated by red arrows).
3 4 • I N T E R F A C E DE C E M B E R 2 0 1 6
• Full coverage of manufacturerapproved,
high-temperature, selfadhesive,
polymer-modified-bituminous
underlayment applied directly
to existing prepared roof deck cover
board surfaces
• 2-in., mechanical-lock, standingseam
metal roofing system assembly,
complete with manufacturerapproved
flashing and sheet metal
details at all perimeter and penetration
locations. All panels fabricated
from prefinished 22-gauge
Galvalume® architectural sheet
metal material, with trim fabricated
from prefinished 24-gauge
Galvalume®.
— Note: The metal roofing panels
were formed on the job site in
continuous lengths and were not
to be swedged or have end laps.
Fasteners must not penetrate
the metal roof panels, except at
the peak, where it was necessary
to pin the panels beneath the
peak closure and flashings as
shown on the shop drawings.
• Metal roofing clips installed in a
fastening pattern as determined by
site-specific engineering to meet
specified wind uplift criteria, as well
as current International Building
Code (ASCE 07-05) and local regulatory
agency requirements. All metal
I’M SMALL …
BUT HAVE A
BIG APPETITE
ARE ELECTRICITY PEAK DEMAND CHARGES
TAKING A BITE OUT OF YOUR BUDGET?
With 1,440 minutes in a day, how can usage from just 15 peak-use
minutes account for a third of your energy bill? Utilities charge a much
higher rate for that interval than for the other 99% of the day. Find
out how peak demand charges are computed. Then spend 15 minutes
checking out roof refl ectivity’s role in reducing your energy bill.
PUT DEMAND CHARGES ON A DIET.
LEARN MORE AT VINYLROOFS.ORG/PEAK-ENERGY-DEMAND
DE C E M B E R 2 0 1 6 I N T E R F A C E • 3 5
Figure 4 – Section through
expansion joint curb
at side wall.
Figure 3
– Section
through
expansion
joint curb.
roofing clips and bearing plates
manufactured from galvanized steel
and supplied by the manufacturer.
• Minimum 18-gauge galvanized steel
backup plates installed at all hip,
ridge, and valley locations
The issue at hand on this project was
a large expansion joint curb that extended
across the roof,
parallel to the
panels of the main
roof slope, but
also intersecting
two dormer valley
flashings and
sidewalls. The
roof plan may be
viewed in Figure
1. A close-up
section of the
expansion joint
curb may be
seen in Figure 2.
The expansion
joint intersection
with the
dormer valley
occurred in
two places on
opposite sides of the building, both mirror
images of one another. The project architect
made an attempt to conceptualize the
expansion joint flashing above and below
the valley flashing, but struggled with how
to deal with the actual transition of the
expansion joint curb to the valley, then into
the sidewall expansion joint and flashing
on the wall below the
valley. Figures 3 and 4
show the details in the shop drawings.
When it came to the actual valley intersection
with the expansion joint curb, it
was necessary to allow for expansion and
contraction of the sheet metal flashing in
six different directions, yet keep the flashing
system weathertight. Figure 5 shows the
intersection. Figure 6 illustrates the first
attempt of the roofing contractor to flash
the condition, while Figure 7 was the architectural
detail from the original plans and
specifications. This detail was the same as
saying, “Roofer: Figure this out because we
don’t know how to do it.”
After submitting a request for information
(RFI) to the architectural design team on this
project, the latter came up with the architectural
renderings in Figures 8A and 8B.
While these renderings are nice, they
in no way provide any clarity as to how
to install the sheet metal flashings at this
transition. The standing seam roof panels
above the valley on the main roof area are
nearly 70 ft. long. Installing a dam on the
top side of the valley, at the termination of
the expansion joint curb, would create a
“dead” valley, with a tremendous amount
of water flowing across the transition in a
heavy rain event. Additionally, it is virtually
impossible to install a 36-in.-girth gutter in
such a manner that it might extend all the
Figure 6 – Temporary expansion joint; temporary valley flashing.
Figure 7 – Architectural detail of expansion joint flashing from
original plans and specifications.
3 6 • I N T E R F A C E DE C E M B E R 2 0 1 6
Figure 5 – Expansion joint valley
intersection prior to panel and flashing installation.
way into the transition
as drawn.
As architectural
standing seam metal
roofing professionals, we
are tasked with attachment
of the metal roofing
panels, flashings,
and trim to meet current
minimum building
code and local regulatory
agency requirements,
including the
engineering of necessary
clip spacing;
allowing for the coefficient
of expansion and
contraction of each metal
roofing and flashing component; ensuring
long-term weathertightness of the assembly;
and, at the end of the day, it has to look
good. The specific conditions represented
by this project are no different. Both transitions
actually occur directly over the main
entrances of the building on both sides.
After grappling with the specific issues
of this complicated transition, we managed
to come up with a detail that we feel
comfortable will meet the criteria outlined
above. The specific details of Figure 9 may
be broken down as follows:
• The pink zee flashing at the side wall
condition has been custom-modified
to taper from 2 in. on the high side
down to 0 in. where it extends up
the slope beneath the main roof
panel. The zee flashing is set in
butyl sealant tape and pop-riveted
to the surface of the down-slope roof
panel parallel to the side wall.
• The red drip edge is fastened to the
butt edge at the eave of the dormer
roof above the down-slope roof panel
of the main roof area.
• The red offset cleat is set in butyl
sealant tape and pop-riveted to the
surface of the down-slope roof panel.
The down-slope roof panel extends
a minimum of 12 in. beneath the
up-slope panel of the main roof area
(directly adjacent to the expansion
joint curb).
• The green valley pan extension
extends a minimum of 36 in.
beneath the main valley pan and
is hemmed and locked onto the
dormer drip edge, zee flashing, and
offset cleat. Three applications of triple-
bead butyl sealant are installed
across the valley
pan extension
(minimum 8 in.
from one another)
between the
underlap valley pan extension and
the main valley pan flashing.
• A second red offset cleat is set in
butyl sealant tape and pop-riveted
to the surface of the valley pan
extension, parallel to and along the
upper edge of the valley pan.
• The finished roof panels are notched,
hemmed, and locked onto the drip
edge, valley pan extension, and offset
cleats. The hem at the butt edge
of the roof panels is sealed with gungrade
butyl sealant, and butyl sealant
is field-applied across the male
leg (approximately 1 in. up slope) of
the finished panels, prior to locking
the panels together.
The design professional of record on this
project was clearly out of his element when
developing the necessary flashing design
for the expansion joint transition into the
dormer valley. The obvious way to eliminate
DE C E M B E R 2 0 1 6 I N T E R F A C E • 3 7
Figures 8A and 8B – Architectural renderings
showing an attempt at remedial action.
Figure 9 – Final expansion joint curb/dormer valley detail.
this problem would have been to move the building expansion
joint and subsequent curb over at least 24 in. away from the
valley. Unfortunately, the transition was never even thought
about or discussed until the building was constructed and it
was too late. Figures 10 and 11 show the successful integration
of the standing seam roofing and flashing materials as they
were ultimately constructed and installed.
Architectural standing seam metal roofing systems are
traditionally unforgiving, and some flashing details present
challenging situations. We were able to come together and
find some common ground to form a successful weathertight
flashing solution. All parties—from the initial project conception
to the design team and the construction team—learned
some valuable lessons from this case study. Most importantly,
we would encourage design professionals to engage an RCI
registered professional to be a part of the design team when
dealing with the complexities of the building envelope.
3 8 • I N T E R F A C E DE C E M B E R 2 0 1 6
Christopher A.
Payne, RRC, CDT,
is manager of technical
services and
roofing/product
manager for NB
Handy Company
of Lynchburg, VA.
He has over 32
years of experience
in the roofing
and construction
industry, starting
his professional
career with a roofing and sheet metal contracting
company in 1984. In 1997, Payne
founded Carolina Roofing Concepts Inc.,
practicing as a professional roof consultant.
He joined NB Handy in 2003.
Christopher A.
Payne, RRC, CDT
Figure 10 – Completed
expansion joint/valley intersection (north side).
Figure 11 –
Completed
expansion
joint/valley
intersection
(south side).
The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has raised its fines for the first time
in 25 years. The new fines took effect in August and represent a 78% increase in the maximum fines. The legislation also gives
OSHA the authority to raise fines annually with inflation. The new penalty structure is shown below:
Violation Current Maximum Penalty new Maximum Penalty
• Serious
• Other than serious $7,000 per violation $12,471 per violation
• Posting requirements
• Failure to abate $7,000/day $12,471/day
• Willful or repeated $70,000/violation $124,709/violation
• Criminal (willfully causing $250,000/death; 6 mo. prison; $250,000/death; 6 mo. prison;
employee’s death) $500,000 penalty for corporations $500,000 penalty for corporations
oSHa Raises fines