Introduction Consider a large wood-framed, stuccoclad school building constructed circa- 2009 in a small coastal town in Northern California. The structure is highly exposed to storm winds blowing in from the Pacific Ocean. As evidenced by Photo 1, building envelope failures have resulted in extensive deterioration and fungal growth within weather-exposed wall assemblies. Presumably in response to concerns regarding potentially corrosive impacts of the harsh marine environment, metal accessories (including aesthetic “reveals”) in the stucco cladding had been upgraded to stainless steel (see Photo 2). The narrow focus of this report is to examine the use of stainless steel “self-drilling tapping screws” to attach these components to the underlying plywood sheathing and wood framing. What Ar e Tapping Scr ews? Tapping screws comprise a wide range of threaded steel fasteners that form (“tap”) their own mating threads when screwed through metal sheeting. A highly common use for tapping screws is the fabrication of ventilation ducts; for this purpose, traditional tapping screws often are simply called “sheet metal screws.” For typical metalto- metal fabrication, the tapping screw installer first must provide a smaller predrilled pilot hole that serves to facilitate the fastener installation process. However, there are specialty fasteners (including “self-piercing tapping screws” and “selfdrilling tapping screws”) that have the ability to both drill their own holes and tap their own internal threads into metal sheeting without deforming their threads. • Self-piercing tapping screws, commonly used with thin (e.g., 26-gauge) metallic sheeting, have sharp angled S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 7 RC I I n t e r f a c e • 4 5 Photo 1 – Building envelope failures at this school building have resulted in extensive deterioration and fungal growth within weather-exposed wall assemblies. Photo 2 – Bugle-head “self-drilling tapping screws” were used to secure the stucco accessories and trim to the underlying plywood sheathing and wood framing. points that provide: 1) “the ability to penetrate without benefit of a predrilled hole,”1 and 2) “the ability to pierce metallic material 33 mils (0.84 mm) or less, form a sleeve by extruding metallic material, and ‘tap’ their own mating threads when driven.”2 • Self-drilling tapping screws, most often used with thicker (up to ½-inch) steel sheets, have case-hardened tips (see Photo 3) that serve as a drill bit. In a single operation, self-drilling tapping screws have: “the ability to drill their own hole and form or cut their own internal mating threads without breaking.”3 In our experience, the most commonly encountered use for self-drilling tapping screws at construction projects is to attach a wide variety of materials (such as engineered wood sheathing, gypsum board panels, and metal flashings) to cold-formed steel-stud framing. ASTM Standards for the Use of Self-Tapping Scr ews to Att ach Metal Accessories Our review of key ASTM International industry standards for the use of selftapping screws in stucco cladding systems revealed the following guidance: • Section 5.1 of ASTM C926 requires: “Metal bases and accessories used to receive plaster shall be installed in conformance with Specification C1063, except as otherwise specified.”4 • Section 6.7.2 of ASTM C1063: “Screws… shall be fabricated in accordance with either Specification C954 or C1002. … 4 6 • RC I I n t e r f a c e S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 7 Photo 3 – Self-drilling tapping screws are equipped with hardened tips that resemble a drill bit. These 1¼-in. buglehead fasteners had “the ability to drill their own hole” through the stainless steel components shown in Photo 2. Photo 5 – Water infiltration through the exposed fasteners exacerbates resulting damage at the stud framing and sheathing. Photo 4 – The bugle-headed self-drilling tapping screws sit proud of the vertical reveal and the horizontal casing bead. Screws used for attachment to metal framing members shall be selfdrilling and self-tapping. Screws used for attachment to wood framing members shall be sharp point.”5 • Section 7.4.2 of ASTM C1002 requires: “Screw threads shall be adequate to pull a metal plaster base tightly…against the face of a wood or steel stud, without spin-out.”6 • Section 8.2.2 of ASTM C1002 further advises: “The top of the screw shall be either flat or contoured. The underside of the head shall be flat or near flat. The threads shall extend to the underside of the head.” • Section 8.5.2 of ASTM C1002 additionally instructs: “Screws shall be long enough to penetrate wood members not less than 5/8 in. (15.9 mm).” (Also reference Section 7.10.2.5 of ASTM C1063.) In brief, stucco industry standards for the use of tapping screws to secure metal bases and accessories to wood stud framing include the following instructions: 1. Only sharp-point fasteners (not self-drilling tapping screws) are accepted at metal-to-wood transitions. 2. Fastener heads should fit flat to the metal base. 3. The screws should have continuous threads from the tip to the underside of the head. 4. The fastener length should be sufficient that these continuous threads also extend at least 5/8 inch into the wood stud framing. 5. The screw-threaded structural bond within these wood studs should be sufficient to pull the metal accessory tightly against the face of the studs (or sheathing) without spin-out. Further, if self-drilling tapping screws are being used in stucco cladding assemblies (whether at metal-to-wood or metalto- metal transitions), great care must be taken to avoid damaging the building paper or wrap that serves as the code-required continuous weather-resistive barrier behind the plaster cement system. Initial Assessment of As-Built Wall Conditions It is informative to compare the above instructions with representative photographs of as-built conditions at this building. For example, per Photo 3, the stucco installer used self-drilling tapping screws (typically intended for use with metal stud framing) at all elevations of the woodframed building. We found no sharp-pointed screws. The installed self-drilling tapping screws have bugle heads (shaped like a trumpet) lacking continuous threads to the underside of the fastener head. (Bugle-headed screws most commonly are found at gypsum board panels, where the holes have been countersunk to accommodate the shape of the bugle head.7) As documented with Photos 2 and 4, bugle-headed fasteners simply cannot fit flat to metal bases and accessories. Similarly, we found that these metal accessories often were not tightly fit to the plywood sheathing under the building paper. Therefore, because the drill point tips of self-drilling tapping screws are not threaded, these fasteners (with a total length of 1¼ in.) simply could not provide the required minimum 5/8-in. thread depth into the wood studs supporting the ½-in. plywood. S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 7 RC I I n t e r f a c e • 4 7 ® Innovation based. Employee owned. Expect more. For information, call 241-515-5000 or go to www.PolyguardBarriers.com by Exclude virtually all insects and pests over the life of the structure by incorporating non-chemical TERM® Barrier System in the envelope. A building envelope to stop leaks of: (Why not? All three leaks penetrate the building envelope) • Moisture • Energy • Insects • Sealant upgrade, tested since 1999 by Texas A&M entomologists • 100% ground level horizontal coverage • 6 new details • Reduces pesticide needs • Increases occupant comfort • Excludes termites and other pests Simple upgrade includes: Non-chemical physical barrier: Sustainability upgrade … Further, as indicated by Photos 3 through 5, we saw that the exposed, poorly secured tapping screws provided direct routes for damaging water infiltration through the building paper into the wood sheathing and studs. An Ex ample of Weath er-Resistive Performance Issues Related to Self-Dr illing Tapping Scr ews Note that our sole purpose for the following photographs is to focus on a specific example of rainwater infiltration conditions and resulting damage causally related to the stucco contractor’s use of self-drilling tapping screws. While sharp-eyed RCI Interface readers may identify other construction deficiencies in these images, such concerns exceed the scope of this article. A representative example, with annotated photographs, of our step-by-step diagnostic analysis8 (carried out in general conformance with investigative protocols of ASTM E21289) is outlined below: 1. Our destructive investigation below an upper floor window exposed wet, degraded gypsum wallboard (see Photo 6). Removal of these fungalc o n tami n a t e d panels confirmed our preliminary assessment that the wood framing and sheathing at this jamb-sill corner would also be wet and decayed (per Photo 7). 2. Our first step toward tracking the origin of this leakage was to waterspray test the bottom two-thirds of this aluminum storefront window assembly. (Note in Photo 8 the standard ASTM E110510 spray rack positioned below the awning framework.) No interior leakage was observed during this water test. 3. However, upon then spraying the upper right corner of this window (see Photos 8 and 9) with a pressurecalibrated nozzle (per test procedures established in industry stan- 4 8 • RC I I n t e r f a c e S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 7 Photo 6 – Wet, degraded (and fungal-contaminated) gypsum wallboard layers were exposed below an upper window. Photo 8 – AAMA nozzle testing at the upper right corner (see Photo 9) of this window produced interior leakage at the sill. Photo 7 – Removal of the degraded wallboard revealed severely damaged framing and sheathing. Photo 9 – Nozzle spray testing (see Photo 8) at this corner of the window frame rapidly caused interior leakage at the sill. dard AAMA 501.211), we quickly were able to replicate a steady flow of interior leakage at the windowsill. 4. Our crew then removed stucco cladding below the exterior sill, revealing deteriorated plywood sheathing and free water (remnants from our waterspray testing) behind the building paper, per Photo 10. (The waterfinding test paper12 seen in this photograph turns red when in contact with free water.) 5. We then removed additional sections of stucco (Photos 11 and 12) in order to trace this water trail up the wall (behind the two layers of building paper) toward the window head. We discovered (per Photos 13 and 14) that the water trail continued under the horizontal stainless steel reveal, which was loosely set with selfdrilling tapping screws and nails. (Note in these photographs the ripped and deteriorated building paper, which provides the infiltrated rainwater immediate access to the surface of the plywood sheathing.) 6. Photos 15 and 16 conclusively established that the origin of the leakage, damage, and fungal growth seen in the preceding photographs was rainwater drainage off the ends of the horizontal head flashing and stucco casing bead (aka, “J mold”) accessory positioned above this storefront window. S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 7 RC I I n t e r f a c e • 5 1 Photo 10 – Water-finding test paper turns red when in contact with free water. 7. Finally, Photo 17 confirmed that rainwater drainage off the ends of the horizontal head flashing and stucco J mold had immediate access to the ripped/deteriorated building paper behind the loosely set stainless steel reveal. In short: Our step-by-step investigation demonstrated that rainwater flow off these horizontal components at the window head (Photo 16) drained behind the stainless steel reveal (Photo 15), then migrated through the ripped/damaged building paper (Photo 14) and continued down the sheathing (Photos 11 and 12), eventually collecting at the jamb-sill corner (Photo 10), then migrating inward, leaving a swath of decay, deterioration, and fungal growth (per Photos 6 and 7) in its wake. The linchpin of this entire deleterious water-intrusion process was the improperly installed self-drilling tapping screw projecting from the horizontal reveal in Photo 16. Summ ary Comm ents As noted, the sole focus of our analysis is the contractor’s use of self-drilling tapping screws to secure stucco accessories and trim to the wall sheathing and wood framing. Any other depicted deviation from any applicable standard exceeds the scope of this article. 5 2 • RC I I n t e r f a c e S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 7 Photo 11 – We traced the water trail up the wall toward the window head (see Photo 12). Photo 13 – The trail of water damage led up (under the loosely set horizontal reveal) toward the head flashing above. Photo 12 – We continued to trace the water trail up the wall toward the window head. Photo 14 – The two layers of ripped and deteriorated building paper correspond to the corroded tapping screw above. In our professional opinion, these 1¼-in. bugle-headed drill-pointed tapping screws: 1) Are not appropriate for use with wood stud framing 2) Are prone to improper “spin-out” 3) Fail to provide an adequate threadmated structural bond with the wood studs 4) Generally tend to unduly damage the wood framing, sheathing, and asphaltic building paper 5) Fail to tightly interface with the stainless steel accessories 6) As evidenced by the stained/corroded screw threads seen in Photo 3, often are installed in a manner that pro- Dealing with the Challenges of Mid-Rise Wood Frame Construction Register Online —————– —————– Approved for 6.25 CEH Find A Seminar Near You —————– NEW DATES & LOCATIONS Photo 15 – The trail of water damage leads directly to the head flashing and J-mold accessory above the horizontal reveal. Photo 16 – The linchpin of this entire deleterious water-intrusion process was the improperly installed self-drilling tapping screw projecting from the horizontal reveal. S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 7 RC I I n t e r f a c e • 5 3 vides a direct route and mechanism for damaging rainwater infiltration into and through the exterior wall assembly Our forensic team members invested more than 30 days total to comprehensively investigate, evaluate, and document (including 8000+ photographs) the as-built construction and weather-resistive performance of the exterior wall assemblies at this school building. Upon final review, we concluded that the overall moisture intrusion conditions (and associated damage to the underlying plywood sheathing, wood framing, and interior wallboard) were so egregious, severe, and extensive that complete removal and replacement of the stucco cladding system were warranted. A key consideration was the many thousands of self-drilling tapping screws remaining at these walls. References 1. ASTM C1002, Standard Specification for Steel Self-Piercing Tapping Screws for the Application of Gypsum Panel Products or Metal Plaster Bases to Wood Studs or Steel Studs. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (www.astm.org). 2. ASTM C1513, Standard Specification for Steel Tapping Screws for Cold- Formed Steel Framing Connections. 3. Ibid. 4. ASTM C926, Standard Specification for Application of Portland Cement- Based Plaster. 5. ASTM C1063, Standard Specification for Installation of Lathing and Furring to Receive Interior and Exterior Portland Cement-Based Plaster. 6. Section 3.2.11 of ASTM C1513 defines spin-out as: “the continued rotation of a screw without further penetration into the substrate.” 7. Section 3.2.6.1 of ASTM C1513 defines a bugle head as: “bugleshape countersinking head typically used for fastening gypsum panel products to wood and steel.” 8. Lonnie Haughton and Colin Murphy. “Qualitative Sampling of the Building Envelope for Water Leakage.” Journal of ASTM International, Vol. 4, No. 9, 2007 (www.astm.org/DIGITAL_ LIBRARY/JOURNALS/JAI/PAGES/ JAI100815.htm): “The goal of the skilled building professional is to produce findings of substantive significance that identify cause-and-effect relationships between building envelope characteristics and observed leakage and resulting damage.” 9. ASTM E2128, Standard Guide for Evaluating Water Leakage of Building Walls. 10. ASTM E1105, Standard Test Method for Field Determination of Water Penetration of Installed Exterior Windows, Skylights, Doors, and Curtain Walls by Uniform or Cyclic Static Air Pressure Difference. 11. AAMA 501.2, Quality Assurance and Diagnostic Water Leakage Field Check of Installed Storefronts, Curtain Walls and Sloped Glazing Systems. American Architectural Manufacturers Association, Schaumberg, IL (www.aamanet.org). 12. Micro Essential Laboratory: http:// w w w . m i c r o e s s e n t i a l l a b . c o m / ProductInfo/F30-SPLTY-WATERFJUD. aspx. 5 4 • RC I I n t e r f a c e S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 7 Bobby Whitworth, Jr., REWC, is a construction consultant and forensic team leader with Richard Avelar & Associates in Oakland, CA. He is a licensed general contractor, a Registered Exterior Wall Consultant and member of RCI, and an International Code Council-certified California Residential Building Inspector. Bobby Whitworth, Jr., REWC Lonnie Haughton, MCP, LEED AP, CDT, is a principal codes and construction consultant with Richard Avelar & Associates in Oakland, CA. He is a licensed general contractor and one of about 900 individuals nationwide who have been certified by the International Code Council as a Master Code Professional. His additional ICC certifications include California Building Inspector, Building Plans Examiner, and Certified Building Code Official. Lonnie Haughton, MCP, LEED AP, CDT Photo 17 – Rainwater drainage off the head flashing and J-mold accessory had immediate access behind this loosely set reveal.
