Skip to main content Skip to footer

When is a “Waterproofing Membrane” Not a Waterproofing Membrane

May 15, 2008

16 • I N T E R FA C E J U N E 2008
Waterproofing is a
term that membrane
manufacturers
use loosely
to describe
any product that
can retard the passage of water. The
membranes may be in sheet form or
liquid-applied. They are used above
ground on spandrels and façades;
on water-containment structures,
including planters; under mechanical-
room and shower-room floors; in
cavity walls; under green vegetative
roofs; and on plazas over occupied
spaces. Below ground, they are used
over earth-covered suspended slabs,
on foundations, and under pressure
slabs on grade.
The ASTM standard definition
for waterproofing (ASTM D1079)
defines it as “treatment of a surface
to prevent the passage of water
under hydrostatic pressure” (emphasis
added).
None of the membranes on the
above-ground components previously
listed (with the exception of
water-containment structures such
as swimming and reflecting pools,
cisterns, sump pits, and the like)
are required to resist hydrostatic
pressure. Either they are oriented
vertically or sloped and not subject
to gravity-induced water pressure;
or, when in a horizontal position,
Waterproofing Redefined
The term “waterproofing” is all-encompassing. To be useful, a definition should be
more specific as to location and function. When used in reference to the various materials
applied to suspended slabs and below-grade building enclosures, I suggest modifying
the term to “building waterproofing” to differentiate it from membranes under interior
wet locations, water containment structures, and vertical, above-grade components
of the building envelope.
Definition
I suggest that the term “building waterproofing” should be defined as a membrane,
coating, or material that prevents the passage of water on the positive (wet) or negative
(dry) side (interior side) of the building envelope that is not exposed to the elements.
Rationale
In waterproofing, hydrostatic pressure provides the force to move water through the
building envelope, but need not be a factor in its definition. Lateral hydrostatic pressure
is exerted on below-grade foundations and slabs on grade by an elevated water table.
Vertical hydrostatic pressure is exerted on suspended slabs by gravity.
The force of gravity will exert hydrostatic pressure on a suspended slab from even a
monomolecular film of water. Therefore, tests to quantify resistance to the passage of
water should be specific as to the maximum pressure the membrane, coating, or material
must be capable of withstanding, and leave it to the judgment of the designer to
select the one most appropriate for the project conditions.
— Justin Henshell, FAIA
cannot accumulate a significant head of
water. For example, plazas are unlikely to
experience accumulations of water in
excess of 3 inches, even when drains are
clogged. Green, vegetative roofs are de –
signed to drain and discharge water, albeit
slowly, to internal drainage systems.
ASTM D5957, which is a guide for floodtesting
membranes, requires the membrane
to be flooded with a minimum of 1 inch and
a maximum of 4 inches of water. This translates
to a maximum pressure of about 20
psf, which is the minimum live load on roofs
and which is transient. Hydrostatic pressure
is required to overcome the surface
tension of water over cracks and membrane
discontinuities and to permit water infiltration.
However, to penetrate a membrane,
heads in excess of 3 inches are required.
Intermittent hydrostatic pressure on
foundations produced by rainfall on residential
and shallow basements is rarely a
concern. Most dampproofing coatings are
capable of preventing significant leaking,
except when flooding occurs or where basements
are built into the hillside. Therefore,
in areas where flooding is common, as well
as where basements are more than 20 ft
below grade, waterproofing systems discussed
below should be strongly considered.
Significantly, ASTM C836, the standard
for cold, liquid-applied waterproofing, does
not list resistance to hydrostatic pressure
as a required physical property. Conse –
quently, with few exceptions, manufacturers
of hot and cold liquid-applied membranes
for plazas and below grade do not
publish test results for resistance to hydrostatic
pressure either.
On the other hand, virtually all sheetmembrane
manufacturers routinely include
resistance to hydrostatic pressure in their
tables of physical properties. Except for
PVC and butyl, most sheet systems are
based on the test protocol set forth in ASTM
D5385, Test Method for Hydrostatic
Pressure Resistance of Waterproofing
Membranes. PVC uses D751 for coated fabrics.
With few exceptions, sheet membranes
can pass a test for resisting a pressure of
over 200 ft of water. So can encapsulated
and laminated (but not cardboard-faced)
bentonite clay products.
Most manufacturers of negative-side
waterproofing such as crystalline, metal
oxide, and polymer-modified cement, conform
to the Corps of Engineers’ CRD-C48-
73, which requires resistance to hydrostatic
pressure at a depth of 405 feet. However,
the watertight integrity of concrete slabs
and foundations that are waterproofed with
these materials depends more on the efficacy
of waterstops in cold joints than on the
water-resistant properties of the coating.
When below-grade structures that
enclose habitable spaces or enclosed horizontal
surfaces experience significant
hydrostatic pressure, whether continuous
or intermittent, the prudent designer
should specify sheet membranes with published
test results verifying that they can
resist at least 125% of the anticipated pressure.
If the designer elects to specify hot or
cold liquid-applied membranes, he or she
should ensure that the manufacturers have
published test reports, based on accepted
standards, certifying the membranes’
capacity to resist 125% of the maximum
anticipated pressure.
BUILT TO LAST
BACKED IN WRITING
1-877-TPO-ROOF • www.stevensroofing.com􀀡
J U N E 2008 I N T E R FA C E • 1 7
Justin Henshell, FAIA, FASTM, is a registered architect and
partner In Henshell & Buccellato, Consulting Architects, specializing
in moisture-related issues in the building envelope
since 1974. He is the author of 37 technical articles on roofing
and waterproofing, an ASTM standard on waterproofing
details, The Manual of Below-Grade Waterproofing Systems
(John Wiley & Sons), and coauthor of an NCARB monograph
on built-up roofing. Henshell has received the Walter C. Voss
Award from ASTM for outstanding contributions to the
advancement of building technology and the William C. Correll Award from RCI for outstanding
actions beneficial to professional development of the industry.
Justin Henshell, FAIA, FASTM