Skip to main content Skip to footer

Below-Grade Waterproofing: Failures and Solutions

March 31, 2008

Below-Grade Waterproofing: Failures and Solutions

 

Karim P. Allana, RRC, RWC, PE
Allana Buick & Bers, Inc.
Palo Alto, California
ABSTRACT
Sodium bentonite panel-based waterproofing systems have steadily gained in popu¬
larity for below-grade application for both blind-side and positive-side use. Many dif¬
ferent manufacturers offer different bentonite panels, such as combination water and
methane gas barriers, panels for use with shotcrete and cast-in-place concrete appli¬
cation, and combination panels such as heat-weldable PVC and bentonite sandwich.
The presentation will include a review of different types of lagging systems used for
soil retention and how they impact bentonite panel-based waterproofing systems. The
presentation will also include a forensic case study of a failed blindside waterproof¬
ing at a large 4-story, below-grade garage in Northern California. Lessons learned
from this forensic study include impact of wood lagging, use of shotcrete as opposed
to CIP concrete, and how to repair failed waterproofing with polyurethane grout injec¬
tion technology.
SPEAKER
Karim P. Allana, PE, RRC, RWC, is chief executive officer and senior principal with
Allana Buick & Bers, Inc., with offices and projects throughout the western U.S. He
earned a B.S. in civil engineering from Santa Clara University and is a registered pro¬
fessional engineer (civil engineering) in California, Hawaii, and Nevada. Mr. Allana is
also RCI-registered as an RRC and RWC.
Mr. Allana is responsible for planning and administration of the company, as well as
providing technical standards for below-grade waterproofing and other components
of the building envelope. Under Mr. Allana’s guidance and direct supervision, Allana
Buick & Bers annually designs and manages more than $200 million in building
envelope construction projects.
In addition to active RCI membership, he is a member of the International Concrete
Repair Institute (ICRI), The American Architectural Manufacturers Association
(AAMA), the Sealant Waterproofing and Restoration Institute (SWRI), the
Construction Specifications Institute (CSI), the National Roofing Contractors
Association (NRCA), and the Western Construction Consultants Association (WESTCON).
Contact Information: Phone – 650-543-5600; E-mail – karim@abbae.com
Allana – 4 Proceedings of the RCI 23rd International Convention

 

Below-Grade Waterproofing: Failures and Solutions

INTRODUCTION
Sodium bentonite-based wa¬
terproofing systems have steadily
gained in popularity for belowgrade
application for both blindside
and positive-side construc¬
tion. Although bentonite is in
many household products, it has
become one of the more versatile
waterproofing materials available
on the market today. Bentonite
has many applications, including:
• Underslabs
• Zero property line (blindside)
construction
• Back-filled walls
• Earth-covered structures
• Tunnels
• Split-slab deck construc¬
tion
• Hydrostatic and non¬
hydrostatic site conditions
There are many manufactur¬
ers who offer a variety of bentonite
waterproofing systems. Some of
these product variations include
standard bentonite sheet with a
HDPE waterproofing membrane
for repelling water or a multi-layer
(bentonite, HDPE, and woven fab¬
ric) sheet membrane combination
for repelling water and gas. The
multi-layer sheet membrane is
designed for use with shotcrete
and cast-in-place concrete appli¬
cations.
For the purpose of this pre¬
sentation, the focus will be on
bentonite adhered to HDPE sheet
used in blindside construction.
Bentonite systems are considered
the most effective for blindside
applications compared to other
non-bentonite methods. Blindside
applications include both cast-inplace
concrete and shotcrete
foundation walls placed against
soldier piles and lagging, steel
sheet piling, concrete caisson
retaining walls, and diaphragm
walls.
There are a number of differ¬
ent types of blindside construc¬
tion procedures that impact ben¬
tonite-based waterproofing sys¬
tems in different ways. A forensic
case study was done of a failed
blindside waterproofing system at
the second largest below-grade
structure in Northern California
with two stories below the water
table and built on a zero lot line
with shotcrete installed against
wood lagging and soldier piles.
Lessons learned from this forensic
study include the impact of wood
lagging, use of shotcrete as
opposed to cast-in-place concrete,
and how to repair failed water¬
proofing with polyurethane grout
injection technology. The repairs
were made using injection of sev¬
eral types of chemical grout as a
barrier curtain behind the entire
surface of the below-grade walls
and portions of the slab. Lessons
learned from this project prompt¬
ed the manufacturer of the sodi¬
um bentonite/ HDPE composite
system to make changes in its
specifications for application of its
products, acceptable substrates,
and shotcrete. Additionally, these
lessons will help consultants who
design below-grade waterproofing
systems, as well as monitors who
perform quality assurance roles.
HISTORY
In 2005, U.S. was the top pro¬
ducer of bentonite, with almost
one-third of the world share, fol¬
lowed by China and Greece,
reports the British Geological
Survey.
The absorbent clay was given
the name bentonite by an
American geologist sometime after
its discovery in about 1890 at the
Benton Formation (a geological
stratum, at one time Fort Benton)
in Montana’s Rock Creek area.
Other modern discoveries include
montmorillonite discovered in
1847 in Montmorillon in the
Vienne prefecture of France, in
Poitou-Charentes, South of the
Loire Valley.
Most high-grade commercial
sodium bentonite mined in the
United States comes from the
area between the Black Hills of
South Dakota and the Big Horn
Basin of Wyoming. Sodium ben¬
tonite is also mined in the south¬
western United States, in Greece,
and in other regions of the world.
Calcium bentonite is mined in the
Great Plains, Central Mountains,
and southeastern regions of the
United States. Supposedly, the
world’s largest current reserve of
bentonite is Chongzuo, in China’s
Guangxi province.
WHAT IS BENTONITE?
Bentonite was formed from
volcanic ash deposited in an
ancient sea where it was modified
by a geological process into sodi¬
um bentonite. Bentonites were
calculated to have accumulated
Proceedings of the RCI 2 3rd International Convention Allana – 5
Sodium, bentonite granules.
between 74.5 and 70 million years
ago. At that time, the area was the
center of a huge, shallow inland
sea stretching from the Arctic
Ocean to present-day Mexico and
was nearly a 1,000 miles wide.
Bentonite is an absorbent alu¬
minum phyllosilicate generally
composed of impure clay. There
are two types of bentonite: a
swelling sodium bentonite and a
non-swelling calcium bentonite. It
forms from weathering of volcanic
ash, most often in the presence of
water.
Sodium bentonite expands
when wet, absorbing up to eight
times its dry mass in water, which
gives it tremendous sealing prop¬
erties. Sodium bentonite has been
called the clay of a thousand uses.
It contains exchangeable sodium
cations, which are positively
charged ions that attract the cath¬
ode in electrolysis. When the
Sodium bentonite expansion
dry/wet.
Sodium bentonite mining quarry.
cations are dispersed
in water, they separate
into plate-like parti¬
cles, which are nega¬
tively charged on the
surface and positively
charged on the edges.
This unique ion
exchange relationship
is responsible for the
expansion, binding, or
absorbing action that
takes place. Benton¬
ite’s small plate-like
particles provide a
tremendous potential
for increasing surface
area. It forms thixotropic gels with
water, even when the amount of
bentonite is relatively small.
Modern chemical processes can
modify the ionic surface of sodi¬
um bentonite, dramatically inten¬
sifying the binding or absorbing
action. This result is so remark¬
able that dough-like casting sand
mixes can endure molten metal
temperatures. These characteris¬
tics and modifications give ben¬
tonite an enormous range of
potential uses.
Besides below-grade water¬
proofing as an industrial applica¬
tion, it is commonly used in
drilling mud for oil and gas wells
in geotechnical and environmen¬
tal investigations, in the sealing of
subsurface disposal systems for
spent nuclear fuel, and for quar¬
antining metal pollutants of
groundwater. Other uses include
making slurry walls, forming
other impermeable barriers such
as plugging old wells, lining the
base of landfills to prevent migra¬
tion of leachate into the soil, as an
animal feed binder, kitty litter, or
as a stucco and mortar plasticizer.
The binding action of ben¬
tonite allows high-pressure ram¬
ming or pressing of the clay into
molds to produce hard, refractory
shapes, such as model rocket
nozzles. An easy demonstration of
this would be to get a brand of cat
litter known to be bentonite.
Simply ram a sample of the gran¬
ules with a hammer into a sturdy
tube with a close-fitting rod. It will
form a very hard consolidated
plug that is not easily crumbled.
Bentonite also has the unique
property of adsorbing relatively
large amounts of protein mole¬
cules from liquids. This property
has become useful in the process
of winemaking, where it is used to
remove excessive amounts of pro¬
tein from white wines. Bentonite
prevents most white wines from
precipitating undesirable floccu¬
lent clouds or hazes upon expo¬
sure to warmer temperatures as
these proteins denature. It also
induces more rapid clarification of
both red and white wines.
Calcium bentonite, the non¬
swelling bentonite, is sold in the
alternative health market for its
purported cleansing properties. It
is usually combined with water
and ingested, often as part of a
detox diet. Calcium bentonite may
be converted to sodium bentonite
and take on properties typical of
sodium bentonite by a process
known as “ion exchange.” Com¬
monly, this means adding 5-10%
of sodium carbonate to wet ben¬
tonite, mixing well, and allowing
time for the ion exchange to take
place. Calcium bentonite is not
used in below-grade waterproof¬
ing.
Allans – 6 Proceedings oj tire RCI 23rd International Convention
MINING PROCESS
Mining of bentonite is much
different from traditional mining
methods. The process allows the
reclamation of the mining site to
be restored to its near original
condition, making this an accept¬
able product for sustainable
building. Before mining bentonite
can begin, a detailed plan for
extracting the mineral is devel¬
oped by drilling and sampling.
Once the area and depths are
defined, mining begins by remov¬
ing the overburden from the min¬
eral deposit with large earth
movers. The overburden is then
stockpiled nearby for reclamation
after the bentonite has been
removed from the bed. When
extracting the bentonite from the
bed, extreme care is taken to
avoid contaminating the mineral
deposit with the overburden, thus
ensuring a high quality of the raw
material. Care is also taken to
conserve as much bentonite as
possible when trimming the over¬
burden from the bentonite.
When all the bentonite has
been removed from the bed, recla¬
mation begins. The surface of the
mine site is returned to a condi¬
tion equal or superior to that prior
to mining. Many bentonite mining
companies return the mining
sites back to their natural habitat
for plants and animals, and recog¬
nize other environmental consid¬
erations.
The bentonite from each bed
is stockpiled and tested for quali¬
ty. It is then carefully dried and
ground to meet product specifica¬
tions. The finished product is
stored in silos until it is shipped
to manufacturers of bentonite
products.
HISTORICAL USE IN
BELOW-GRADE WATER¬
PROOFING APPLICATIONS
Bentonite waterproofing mate¬
rials were introduced in the mid-
1920s and primarily used in gran¬
ular form for the sealing of pond
liners and compacted-earth dams
until the late 1950s. Shortly after,
they were introduced into the
building waterproofing market
and by the mid-1960s a line-up of
bentonite products were made
available in panels, sheets, and
trowelable and sprayed forms.
These distinct applications are
the precursors of what may be
considered to be one of today’s
more versatile products.
Sprayed and troweled applica¬
tions have nearly gone away due
to the difficulty in applying uni¬
form thickness and a tendency to
hydrate prematurely. Bentonitefilled
cardboard panels, the first
commercially available bentonite
system, are not widely used today.
The panel system has been sup¬
plemented by composite products
consisting of bentonite combined
with HDPE geomembranes or
durable geotextiles. These new
composite materials are easier to
install and provide better barrier
performance. Typical composite
roll widths are four feet and
lengths varying from 15 feet to 24
feet. The common forms of com¬
posite bentonite waterproofing
products have bentonite granules
either encapsulated between
polypropylene geotextile fabrics or
laminated to one side of a HDPE
geomembrane sheet. Both of
these product forms are appropri¬
ate for blindside and positive-side
construction. They contain rough¬
ly one pound of bentonite gran¬
ules per square foot.
The product installed on this
case study project was the ben¬
tonite/ HDPE composite system.
The HDPE layer is intended to
provide the first water barrier
layer and prevent pre-hydration
from rain or existing groundwater.
Because the HDPE liner does not
encapsulate and contain the ben¬
tonite, the bentonite can be sus¬
ceptible to pre-hydration and free
swell, which can result in dimin¬
ished performance potential.
COMMERCIAL BENTONITE/
HDPE PRODUCTS
Tremco produces several dif¬
ferent bento nite /HDPE composite
waterproofing products. Paraseal
and Paraseal LG are described
below. Both systems are used in
blindside construction applica¬
tions, but have different design
characteristics. These character¬
istics are described and a techni¬
cal data table provided herein.
TREMCO – PARASEAL LG
Paraseal LG is a multi-layer
sheet membrane waterproofing
system. It consists of a self-seal¬
ing, expandable layer of granular
bentonite. The bentonite layer is
laminated at the rate of up to one
pound per square foot to an
impermeable, high-density poly¬
ethylene (HDPE). The third com¬
ponent is a protective layer of
spun polypropylene. Together,
these three components form a
waterproofing membrane manu¬
factured in controlled thicknesses
of 170 mils to 200 mils. This mul¬
tiple-component sheet membrane
waterproofing system is specially
designed for blindside installa¬
tions such as lagging, under floor
slabs, and elevator pits. Tremco
allows the use of Paraseal LG
applications where shotcrete is
blown directly into the face of the
membrane.
Paraseal LG can be used for
waterproofing from the blindside
(lagging, etc.) where the water¬
proofing membrane is applied
before the walls are poured. It is
designed to resist damage from
some exposure to inclement wea¬
ther, normal concrete pours, or
direct installation of shotcrete.
Paraseal LG is sold for use in the
water table for application in
hydrostatic head conditions.
Inherent limitations of ben¬
tonite HDPE composite mem¬
brane include application in
brackish or slightly salty ground¬
water, in standing water during
Proceedings of the RCI 23rd International Convention Allans – 7
construction, or over snow. For
brackish conditions, Saltwater
Paraseal is available, which con¬
tains a chemically treated ben¬
tonite to swell when soils have
high alkalinity. However, the ben¬
tonite only swells to half the rate
compared to standard bentonite
in freshwater conditions. Addi¬
tionally, Paraseal products re¬
quire compaction/ confinement to
be effective in fresh or brackish
conditions. A minimum confine¬
ment of 24 psf is required.
Achieving proper confinement can
sometimes be challenging in wood
lagging and other conditions.
All blindside installations
have the bentonite side facing the
installer so that the bentonite is in
direct contact with the concrete to
be waterproofed. Examine all sur¬
faces prior to starting application.
All spaces between lagging larger
than 1 in (2.5 cm) shall be covered
with 3/4 in (6.4 mm) treated ply¬
wood prior to installation.
Lagging Installation:
In lagging applications, it is
critical that all voids and spaces
between the lagging and soil be
fully grouted or filled with sand.
Voids behind the lagging can
cause the lagging to be displaced
and will result in reduced or
absent confinement between the
bentonite panel and lagging. This
problem is further exacerbated by
shotcrete application, which pro¬
duces limited or no hydrostatic
pressure during application of
shotcrete, as opposed to cast-inplace
concrete. Vibrated cast-inplace
concrete produces hydro¬
static pressure, which can push
against the bentonite panel and
displace the lagging while the con¬
crete is still fluid, creating consol¬
idation. Such is not the case with
Shotcrete, which is blown in place
with extremely high slump mater¬
ial and does not create sufficient
hydrostatic pressure to push the
lagging back into the void and
potentially create a lack of con¬
finement.
Paraseal LG may be installed
in a vertical or horizontal direc¬
tion. Lap joints 3 inches (7.6 cm)
shingle fashion (top over bottom)
when pouring against; 4 inches
(10.2 cm) shingle fashion (bottom
over top) when shotcreting
against. Fasten all seams at 4
inches (10.2 cm) over center.
Apply paramastic, TREMproof
201/60T, or TREMproof 250GC-T
around all tiebacks and penetra¬
tions. To avoid prehydration, pro¬
tect the installed panels from
flooding prior to concrete pour. If
the product has been exposed to
inclement weather, check panels
to make sure it has not hydrated.
Penetration:
Tiebacks, tie bolts, misaligned
soldier piles, whalers, and brack¬
ing may all penetrate the Paraseal
LG membrane and must be
detailed properly.
Protection:
The Paraseal LG dual water¬
proofing system has a puncture¬
resistant HDPE liner of 169-lb
point load (76.6 kg) and does not
require an additional protection
course for most applications.
Storage:
Protect from moisture. Store
on skid or pallet; cover with poly¬
ethylene or tarp. Do not double
stack pallets.
CETCO – VOLCLAY VOLTEX DS
Voltex is the geotextile line of
the Volclay bentonite waterproof¬
ing panel systems. The Voltex
composite is comprised of two
high strength geotextiles sand¬
wiching 1.10 lbs of sodium ben¬
tonite per square foot. The Voltex
DS adds an integrated polyethyl¬
ene liner to the geotextile layer for
added protection and vapor
retarder. The two geotextiles are
interlocked by a patented needle¬
punching process which sand¬
wiches and holds the granular
bentonite in place for a more con¬
sistent appli¬
cation of ma¬
terial.
Voltex DS
is engineered
for water¬
proofing un¬
der slabs and
blindside ap¬
plications .
Under slabs,
Voltex DS can
be installed
directly over a
properly pre¬
pared sub¬
strate without
Notes:
When Spraying Shotcrete or Other Materials
Against Paraseal Products, Spray Either
Directly at Seam or at Closed Edge of
Seam So As Not To Lodge Sprayed Material
Between Lapped Sheets. Never Spray
Into Open Edge of Seam.
When Spraying Shotcrete or Other Materials
Use Paraseal LG ONLY.
Seams May Run Horizontal (As Shown) or
Vertical. When Running Horizontal The Open
Edge of The 4″ Seams Should Be Aiming Up.
Nail 4″ Seams Every 24* o.c. and Staple
Every 3’o.c. (BSW-28)
Proper installation of shotcrete against Paraseal LG. the need for a
Allana – 8 Proceedings of the RCI 23rd International Convention
concrete mud slab; however, a
mud slab does provide a more
consistent and sound substrate..
While its durable composite con¬
struction resists damage from
tradesman installing reinforcing
steel over it, a 3-inch protection
slab provides better defense from
construction damage and is rec¬
ommended (by this author) for
thick Mat slabs that require a lot
of reinforcing steel. For blindside
applications, Voltex DS is simply
installed against the retention
wall and then the concrete is
poured directly against it using a
single-sided form. For shotcrete
application, CETCO recommends
two layers of bentonite water¬
proofing, generally Voclay card¬
board type panel followed with
Voltex DS or Ultraseal SP. Other
applications include backfilled
concrete foundation walls, shot¬
crete, and cut-and-cover tunnels.
Installation of Voltex DS
involves positioning the woven
geotextile side (dark gray) facing
the installer so that the shotcrete
will be shot against the geotextile
side. The panels are secure with
washer head mechanical fasten¬
ers. Voclay and Voltex can be
installed to green concrete with¬
out primers or adhesives, in bad
weather, including freezing tem¬
peratures and damp conditions.
When concrete is poured against
Voltex DS, a mechanical bond
yielding an average adhesion
value of 15 pounds per linear inch
(15 pli) is created by the wet con¬
crete solidifying (clinging) around
the geotextile fibers. Voltex DS
can also be used with reinforced
shotcrete walls, a minimum of 8
inch thick, applied from the bot¬
tom up to their full design thick¬
ness in a single application with
lift heights limited to a maximum
of four feet. Due to the mechanical
bond being created between con¬
crete and the geotextile fabric,
Voltex DS provides an added mea¬
sure of consolidation against con¬
crete or shotcrete.
Voltex DS is designed only for
below-grade and/or confined
waterproofing applications. Vol¬
clay products should not be
installed in standing water. If
groundwater contains strong
acids, alkalies, salts, or is of a
conductivity of 2,500 pmhos/cm
or greater, water samples should
be submitted for compatibility
testing. Volclay Ultraseal SP may
be required if contaminated
groundwater or saltwater condi¬
tions exist.
For contaminated water or
brackish conditions, Voltex DS is
available with a contaminant¬
resistant Volclay sodium ben¬
tonite – Voltex DSCR. Volclay sodi¬
um bentonite combines natural
sodium bentonite and a chemical¬
ly resistant hydrophilic polymer to
form a bentonite-polymer alloy
(BPA). Ultraseal is a bentonitepolymer
interaction formed
through a proprietary blending
process that produces a homoge¬
neous alloy with improved conta¬
minant resistance, enhanced
swelling properties, and a base¬
line permeability one magnitude
better than natural sodium ben¬
tonite. Ultraseal has a lower per¬
meability; it weighs 50% less than
traditional bentonite products,
which makes it easier to handle
and install. According to CETCO,
Proceedings of the RCI 23rd International Convention Allana – 9
PARASEAL & VOLTEX VOLCLAY TECHNICAL DATA COMPARISON
Physical Properties Method Paraseal LG Value Voltex Volclay Value Test
Tensile strength: membrane (PSI) 4,000 PSA (27.6MPa) ASTM-D412
Resistance to micro-organisms
(bacteria, fungi, mold, yeast)
Unaffected Unaffected
Elongation – ultimate failure of
membrane
700% N/A D412 Dumbbell
Puncture resistance 169 lbs (76.6 kg) 140 lbs (63.5 kg) FTMS 101 B/ ASTM D 4833
Hydrostatic pressure resistance 150 ft (45.6 m) 231 ft (70 m) Paraseal – ASTM D751 Method A,
Footnote #1 below; Voltex – ASTM
D 5385 mod.
Resistance to water migration
under membrane: zero leakage
150 ft (45.6 m)/head Footnote #2
Grab tensile strength 95 lbs (422 N) ASTM D 4632
Permeance 2.7×10-13 cm/sec 1×10-10 cm/sec. ASTM D 5084
Installation temperatures -25°F to 130°F
(-31 ,7°C to 54.4°C)
Non-toxic Do not ingest Do not ingest
Low temperature flexibility No effect before or
after installation
Unaffected at -25°F
(-32°C)
ASTM D 1970
Non-staining
Resistance to chemicals & gasses:
Extremely high resistance – contact
manufacturer for specific information
Life expectancy: Both high density
polyethylene and bentonite have life
expectancy measurable in the
thousands of years.
Footnotes for Technical Data:
1. A 1 -in. (2.5 cm) diameter hole was cut in the middle of a 3-1/2-in (8.9-cm) diameter sample of Paraseal LG. Sample clamped in 3-in
(7.6-cm) diameter permeameter, 150-ft (45.6-m) waterhead applied.
2. Membrane applied to porous stone and placed in permeameter. Pressure increased to equivalent of 150-ft (45.6m) waterhead.
the active, swelling properties of
the bentonite-polymer alloy seals
small concrete cracks and works
under continuous and intermit¬
tent hydrostatic conditions.
PROJECT CASE STUDY –
SUNNYVALE TOWNE CEN¬
TER PARKING FACILITY
In Sunnyvale, California, a
forensic case study of the water¬
proofing failure of the Downtown
Sunnyvale Garage was performed
for a construction defect litigation
case where a bentonite/ HDPE
composite system was
installed. The project is the
second largest below-grade
structure in Northern
California, with six stories
above grade and four stories
below grade, two of which
were below the water table.
Additionally, this project
was the largest below-grade
waterproofing repair of its
kind in California.
The structure experi¬
enced extensive leakage
throughout the perimeter
Allana – 10 Proceedings of the RCI 23rd International Convention
Excavation, of the soil behind the
wood lagging revealed that once the
wood gets wet, it swells, bends, and
walls in the belowgrade
parking levels.
The structure was
built on zero lot line
with shotcrete foun¬
dation walls placed
against wood lagging
and soldier pile reten¬
tion walls. The study
included performing
core sampling
through the 18-inchthick
shotcrete walls, 5/8-in Zirq Fitting drilling
partial excavation be- through 18-in foundation wall.
hind the lagging, re¬
view of original construction drawings, review of lagging instal¬
lation photos and soil consolidation, visual observations of
twists, especially if there are voids
between the soil and wood.
Void between solder pile and foam
protection board was also evident
and may have contributed to the
failure of the bentonite waterproof¬
ing system.
Voids were present on both sides
of the retaining wall. Voids ranged
from 1 inch thick to up to 4 inches
thick.
Conventional Wood Lagging
Drilled Pier
Soldier Pile with Slurry Fill
Site Over-Excavated to Back Flange
of Soldier Piles
Wood Lagging Inserted Within
Beam Flanges
Wood Lagging Secured with Nails
Sand Slurry Placed Behind Lagging
Typical Voids in Sand Slurry
Insulation Required to Isolate
Soldier Piles Creates Void
Waterproofing and Structural Wall
Placement
Proceedings of the RCI 23rd International Convention Aliana – 1 1
Conventional wood lagging.
Void behind foam protection board,
shotcrete lagging.
leaks, and water testing.
Excavation of the soil
behind the wood lagging
revealed that once the wood
gets wet, it swells, bends,
and twists, especially if
there are voids between the
soil and wood.
The repair included
drilling 5/8-in diameter
holes in four feet on center
grid formation through the
18-inch shotcrete founda¬
tion wall. Several types of
hydroactive grouts were
injected through the holes
to reach behind the founda¬
tion walls. Upon contact
with water, the grout quickly
expands and cures to form a
water barrier behind the entire
surface of the wall and under por¬
tions of the slab. The grout injec¬
tion process is designed to fill any
voids behind the foundation wall.
Once the injected grout reached
maximum confinement, the mate¬
rial would continue to internally
expand, thus increasing the den¬
sity. Upon completing the injec¬
tion repairs, the project was fur¬
ther studied by performing core
samples through the concrete to
assess the effectiveness and
migration of the grout injection. In
many core samples, it was evident
the grout migrated and expanded
Shotcrete lagging. Shotcrete lagging.
Allana – 12 Proceedings of the RCI 23rd International Convention
so quickly and with such force it
filled in voids on both sides of the
bentonite.
CASE STUDY CONCLUSION
Use of shotcrete as opposed to
traditional cast-in-place concrete
was a factor in the failure, as was
lagging and soil consolidation.
While CIP concrete does a better
job of consolidation, care must be
taken to fill voids behind wood
lagging to ensure good consolida¬
tion. Shotcrete lagging as opposed
to wood lagging greatly eliminates
the potential for voids and is bet¬
ter then wood lagging in ensuring
consolidation. Lessons learned
have helped the manufacturer of
the sodium bentonite/HDPE com¬
posite, as it has led to changes in
its requirements for its own prod¬
ucts. Tremco added language in
its application requirements to
ensure that builders fill voids
behind wood lagging. CETCO now
requires two layers of bentonite
panel/ roll to improve consolida¬
tion. Lessons will help consul¬
tants who design below-grade
waterproofing systems, as well as
monitors that perform quality
assurance roles, to check not only
for proper application of the
waterproofing membranes, but
also the lagging and soil issues.
CONCLUSION
Sodium bentonite can be a
very effective below-grade water¬
proofing system, given appropri¬
ate products are specified and
installed properly, soil testing is
performed, and quality control
processes are implemented dur¬
ing application. Construction
techniques and materials will
continue to evolve as case studies
similar to the Sunnyvale Towne
Center Parking Garage are docu¬
mented so that architects, engi¬
neers, contractors, and manufac¬
turers can determine the post¬
construction effects of these sys¬
tems and where and why the fail¬
ures occur.
Proceedings oj the RCI 23rd International Convention Allana – 13